Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 59

Thread: Outfitters Moose Tag Allocation Artifcle

  1. #41
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chris lavoie View Post
    An outfitter can be charged with counciling his client wrong. Don't think a client would be charged.
    Ignorance of the law is not a defense. Clients know what they're doing. It would never wash in court.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #42
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    You are right trimmer but the outcome of the investigation does allow the CO to decide whether he charges the client or not. An outfitter is considered an agent. For instance, a hunter must notch and tag his bear but an outfitter can do it for him. If the tag is notched wrong both will be charged.

    A client gets a form 33 allowing the hunter to bear hunt in the outfitters assigned lease. The hunter has no idea where the bma boundries are. If a hunter is set up outside the bma and gets a bear the bma holder will get charged, the hunter after the investigation might be charged maybe not. But looses the bear to the crown.

    CO knows whether the client is telling the truth or not. At CO's and procecutors discretion. Happens with a few outfitters from time to time.
    Last edited by chris lavoie; May 14th, 2015 at 12:23 PM.

  4. #43
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Clients most definitely do get charged , just look at what happened to Thomas Pigeon, He argued that he had no idea that the outfitter was not doing things legally when he hunted Musk Oxen.
    The outcome of the court case , he lost everything .

  5. #44
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I know of an instance where an outfitter way east of here that set a custumer up outside his bma. After going in front of the judge. Client lost the bear but was not fined for being out of his outfitters BMA. Outfitter lost his BMa.
    Last edited by chris lavoie; May 14th, 2015 at 12:58 PM.

  6. #45
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    So why then do outfitters get tags from the mnr? for non residents only?

  7. #46
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I don't understand your question. I think residents can use an outfitters adult seals.
    Last edited by chris lavoie; May 14th, 2015 at 12:59 PM.

  8. #47
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Earlier I explained we bought a cow tag from an outfitter in Armstrong for 900$ and was told that was illegal and we And the outfitter could be in big do do.

  9. #48
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I read somewhere that it is illegal to sell a hunting license for more than what the mnr sells the license for.

    If it's illegal turn them in!! It's as simple as that.

    Trimmer again is right, "Ignorance is no excuse". But its up to the judge in the final outcome. I've seen many instances where outfitter rightfully pays and the client does not.

  10. #49
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    It was more than 10 years ago and we had no idea we may have fouled up the rules as it seemed ok , not like Psssss guys , u wanna buy a cow tag? Ok don't tell anyone and if u get caught I don't know you. .. LOL

  11. #50
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    You guys know its happening, complain over and over, but do not ask the omnr to look into it?? It's as simple as picking up the phone and calling your district. They have to investigate if you phone in a complaint.

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •