Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: Volkswagen: Das busted !!!!

  1. #21
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    How many people would not remove a piece of emission equipment on there car if they could, IF there gas mileage went up? Ya thought so.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #22
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wahoo View Post
    It COULD pass the emissions tests. Here is the best guess as to why that I've read:

    "Volkswagen hasn't explained exactly why it cheated, but outside analysts have a good guess. The NOx emission controls likely degraded the cars' performance when they were switched on — the engines ran hotter, wore out more quickly, and got poorer mileage. Some experts have suggested that the emission controls may have affected the cars' torque and acceleration, making them less fun to drive. (Indeed, some individual car owners have been known to disable their cars' emission controls to boost performance, though this is against the law.)

    In other words, Volkswagen wasn't able to produce diesel cars that had the ideal mix of performance, fuel economy, and low pollution. (Or, at least, they couldn't do this profitably.) So they "solved" this trade-off by sacrificing cleanliness and loosening the pollution controls. And they accomplished this via software designed to deceive regulators. This was wildly illegal, and they got caught."

    http://www.vox.com/2015/9/21/9365667...passenger-cars
    Kind of speechless, I wasn't expecting that.

  4. #23
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I think this may have opened a can of worms. How many other manufacturers of automobiles are playing this game?
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  5. #24
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by terrym View Post
    I think this may have opened a can of worms. How many other manufacturers of automobiles are playing this game?
    I would think none because no one else puts Diesel engines in their cars. Big trucks are an entity unto themselves and as such are exempt.

  6. #25
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaycee View Post
    You can also add to the above , all the small single engine aircraft that are constantly flying around I see at least 10 to 15 in our area every day, just this morning alone there have been 9 flying around.
    they don't make a dent. ever got stuck on the 401 lately? urban planning (or the lack of it) is a serious issue and nobody will address this (especially not the tree huggers in California).
    and if you look at government to make a real change, just look at those little buzzers: they are not allowed to have an muffler (even if the owner of a cert. general aircraft would like to) and have to use lead gasoline; for safety sake and to enforce the (outdated) rules

  7. #26
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    how did they actually find out about it?
    internal whistle blower, competitor trying to copy it

  8. #27
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    It was an engineer at a Virginia university who was doing a study, and found it by accident I believe. Didn't read the article, but it may answer your question.

    http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0RM2D720150923

  9. #28
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seabast View Post
    If you all are saying is true, why they had to cheat?
    Better results equals better sales in some cases, in other cases, they just aren't going to pass and have any sort of performance or fuel economy.
    Speak out for Father's rights

  10. #29
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    I would think none because no one else puts Diesel engines in their cars. Big trucks are an entity unto themselves and as such are exempt.
    Big trucks aren't exempt, and the emission equipment on them isn't cheap! I can't remember the model year cut in, but big trucks now require a DPF (Diesel Particulate Filter) that requires periodic servicing, and reduces fuel mileage. The also require a catalytic converter, and since they don't work the same as the one on your gasoline powered car, the also require a DEF (diesel exhaust fluid) system to inject a urea solution made with high-purity urea and distilled water. Because of the water content, they also require heaters to prevent it from freezing in the winter. None of these systems are cheap, that's the cost of clean(r) air.
    Speak out for Father's rights

  11. #30
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaulR View Post
    Big trucks aren't exempt, and the emission equipment on them isn't cheap! I can't remember the model year cut in, but big trucks now require a DPF (Diesel Particulate Filter) that requires periodic servicing, and reduces fuel mileage. The also require a catalytic converter, and since they don't work the same as the one on your gasoline powered car, the also require a DEF (diesel exhaust fluid) system to inject a urea solution made with high-purity urea and distilled water. Because of the water content, they also require heaters to prevent it from freezing in the winter. None of these systems are cheap, that's the cost of clean(r) air.
    Oh,yeah,I'm well aware of the emissions controls on big Diesels,but,they aren't required to do an emission test every second year like a passenger vehicle or light pick up. That's what I meant by "exempt". Sorry for not being crystal clear.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •