Page 29 of 43 FirstFirst ... 1922232425262728293031323334353639 ... LastLast
Results 281 to 290 of 430

Thread: Return of Long Gun Registry

  1. #281
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    http://www.therebel.media/a_gun_regi...eau_or_mulcair
    A gun registry by any other name: That's what Trudeau, Mulcair are vowing


  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #282
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I feel that anyone who would vote, or not, for any particular party based solely on their stance on firearms, is not looking out for our country , but just for themselves, and their own personal interests.

  4. #283
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    I feel that anyone who would vote, or not, for any particular party based solely on their stance on firearms, is not looking out for our country , but just for themselves, and their own personal interests.
    I absolutely agree. In the grand scheme of things,any firearm registry is small potatoes when we take into consideration the catastrophic damage a left wing government could do to our fragile economy,given that the world economy is teetering on the edge of another major retraction and their politically correct,pacifistic approach to Islamic terrorism. Very precarious times for Canadians,indeed.

  5. #284
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    I absolutely agree. In the grand scheme of things,any firearm registry is small potatoes when we take into consideration the catastrophic damage a left wing government could do to our fragile economy,given that the world economy is teetering on the edge of another major retraction and their politically correct,pacifistic approach to Islamic terrorism. Very precarious times for Canadians,indeed.
    Agreed, sadly there are those that will not vote on any reason just on rhetoric and emotion. That seems to be much of the left voters, IF you look at debt, economy, corruption, firearms, world politics, terrorism etc. then I would say with the current Liberal and NDP there is no way any thinking person could vote for them... but many take great efforts to NOT think it seems. (Hence my post about the implications of voting in the Election area.)

  6. #285
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    Sounds to me like someone needs a tinfoil hat !! You require a licence to drive, your truck has a licence.....does that mean your truck is crown property ????
    The plates are crown property. If they take them away, your truck is useless. Surely you wouldnt use a non registered truck...

  7. #286
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    I feel that anyone who would vote, or not, for any particular party based solely on their stance on firearms, is not looking out for our country , but just for themselves, and their own personal interests.
    what upsets me is not that some party has a different view on a certain topic (e.g. firearm laws) and that they spin it their way (they are politicians, what do you expect). nobody should solely vote for a federal party based on their view on firearms. however, if you see, just based on this example, how outlandish the Libs views are and what they propose, you have to wonder if any of their decisions will be based on facts or just extremists' ideology and personal gain.
    as I like to look for an universal pattern, firearm policy (a rather minor topic blown out of proportion) is not too bad of an indicator in this election

  8. #287
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    I feel that anyone who would vote, or not, for any particular party based solely on their stance on firearms, is not looking out for our country , but just for themselves, and their own personal interests.
    Both left parties have said they would end tax breaks and other benefits that take cash from my pocket, and give it to those who "need" it. ie people who dont work. Nothing like being punished for working hard and getting ahead.

    This is about a lot more than firearms, thank you.

  9. #288
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Agreed X2

    Quote Originally Posted by blargon View Post
    Both left parties have said they would end tax breaks and other benefits that take cash from my pocket, and give it to those who "need" it. ie people who dont work. Nothing like being punished for working hard and getting ahead.

    This is about a lot more than firearms, thank you.
    "This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member

  10. #289
    Leads by example

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    I feel that anyone who would vote, or not, for any particular party based solely on their stance on firearms, is not looking out for our country , but just for themselves, and their own personal interests.
    Not necessarily. If it's perceived as a freedom thing, then it's a much bigger issue than being just about firearms.

    I see positions on firearms and freedom of expression issues as pretty damn good indicators of the overall "freedom index" of a particular party. They are kind of canaries-in-the-coal-mine as far as I'm concerned.
    I'm all for chopping government. I've even built a guillotine.

  11. #290
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    What does Bill C-51 say about the "freedom index" of the CPC?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •