-
October 24th, 2015, 08:37 PM
#391
That only works if we take the time to re-register. I won't be taking part in that madness.
During the entire time we suffered through the registry, I was never asked once to produce a registration card at my home, at the range nor in the field. Why would anyone think enforcement would be any more effective this time around?
-
October 24th, 2015 08:37 PM
# ADS
-
October 25th, 2015, 07:02 AM
#392

Originally Posted by
welsh
It's also about time people stopped saying the Liberals are planning to repeal C-42. They aren't. They're repealing two provisions only.
Confirming the sale of a non-restricted with the CFC is not in C-42 but I'll bet before two years are up, legislation is tabled where anybody calling in a transfer, the details will be recorded. What details will be recorded, however, remains to be seen.
-
October 25th, 2015, 08:44 AM
#393
The actual registration, if enacted would be the least of our worries ! Reclassifications and firearms marking will be more intrusive. I predict that anything that remotely looks like a military firearm, will be either restricted or prohibited !
-
October 25th, 2015, 09:40 AM
#394

Originally Posted by
rick_iles
The actual registration, if enacted would be the least of our worries ! Reclassifications and firearms marking will be more intrusive. I predict that anything that remotely looks like a military firearm, will be either restricted or prohibited !
Oh I know. I'm just pointing out to be prepared for this manoeuvre by the Libs as well. There were two things that WC kept harping on since the passing of C-19 - first was tracking firearms sales/transfers of non-restricted and second was reclassifications - all those semi-autos she despises, disappeared in the wind. (Mike in Canmore!) I believe, this time around, there would be massive non-compliance with any ban and firearms owners could hold on for 4 years and try for change in Ottawa to reverse any legislation. We'll see.
I was a victim of reclassification once - a firearm I owned went from non-restricted to prohibited. I'll leave it at that.
-
October 25th, 2015, 10:40 AM
#395

Originally Posted by
annuvin
That only works if we take the time to re-register. I won't be taking part in that madness.
During the entire time we suffered through the registry, I was never asked once to produce a registration card at my home, at the range nor in the field. Why would anyone think enforcement would be any more effective this time around?
Its all well and good to say you would refuse to register, if it came to that, and I agree with the sentiment. However, unless you quit hunting, and don't take your firearms out of the house, you run the risk of being caught with an unregistered firearm. All it would take is something as simple as being caught for speeding or get into an accident.
-
October 25th, 2015, 11:19 AM
#396

Originally Posted by
rick_iles
Its all well and good to say you would refuse to register, if it came to that, and I agree with the sentiment. However, unless you quit hunting, and don't take your firearms out of the house, you run the risk of being caught with an unregistered firearm. All it would take is something as simple as being caught for speeding or get into an accident.
Exactly. Im not prepared to stop hunting nor do I want to risk being charged for a firearms offence.
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
October 25th, 2015, 01:08 PM
#397
It is a legitimate concern for all of us;
but we should also be banging the drums for the controls we currently have in place, the paths that have to be followed to obtain ANY firearm. And after that, what we have to do to be able to use them in the field or range. Handguns are another matter entirely and have a very successful set of rules for their purchase, training and use.
Bleeding hearts forget that we have one of the most successful systems in the world which includes proper storage and transport. Politicians on the other hand care less since it is a vote gathering tool for them.
-
October 25th, 2015, 06:43 PM
#398

Originally Posted by
terrym
Exactly. Im not prepared to stop hunting nor do I want to risk being charged for a firearms offence.
While I understand your concern, it should be pointed out that there is no way the Liberals have either the resources, space nor manpower to charge us all nor lock us up in jail. Hell, they can't even deal with the criminal element that uses illicit firearms while committing violent crimes, never mind the millions of Canadians that own them legally.
The only way a registration or ban would work is if we all comply with it. Otherwise, it becomes yet another piece of failed legislation and the party that passes such nonsense simply look like dopes in the process... Especially when said legislation has just recently been rejected by the majority of voters in this country.
-
October 25th, 2015, 08:41 PM
#399
They don't have to jail you.
Do you have any idea what a criminal conviction will do to your life?
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
October 25th, 2015, 09:24 PM
#400