-
November 29th, 2015, 06:47 PM
#11
They are doing nothing wrong!
-
November 29th, 2015 06:47 PM
# ADS
-
November 29th, 2015, 06:48 PM
#12

Originally Posted by
B Wilson
What they were charged with and what they could be charged with would depend on the CO and what he decided that day.
Having a bad day isn't an excuse to lay "iffy" charges. Actually,it'll get his/her arse kicked. Court officers flip out when that happens. Nobody likes to be made a fool of,especially,them.
-
November 29th, 2015, 06:54 PM
#13
Illegal moose hunting....because the CO 15 years ago thought.................having a high powered centre fire rifle in your vehicle....driving around in an area that has moose/moose hunters you must be poaching.
"Everything is easy when you know how"
"Meat is not grown in stores"
-
November 29th, 2015, 07:11 PM
#14
Has too much time on their hands
This is interesting so far! I'll wait until tomorrow afternoon or so to post the actual outcome.
"where a man feels at home, outside of where he's born, is where he's meant to go"
- Ernest Hemingway
-
November 29th, 2015, 07:14 PM
#15

Originally Posted by
fratri
Illegal moose hunting....because the CO 15 years ago thought.................having a high powered centre fire rifle in your vehicle....driving around in an area that has moose/moose hunters you must be poaching.
X2 you beat me to it fratri
-
November 29th, 2015, 07:15 PM
#16

Originally Posted by
trimmer21
Having a bad day isn't an excuse to lay "iffy" charges. Actually,it'll get his/her arse kicked. Court officers flip out when that happens. Nobody likes to be made a fool of,especially,them.
Not suggesting that the CO would lay charges for things the lads may not have been doing, but the CO may have only given a warning for something instead of laying a charge.
I have received warnings to slow down before, when there was no doubt I was well over the speed limit.
-
November 29th, 2015, 07:19 PM
#17
No violations. No charges.
-
November 29th, 2015, 07:30 PM
#18

Originally Posted by
B Wilson
What they were charged with and what they could be charged with would depend on the CO and what he decided that day.
Best answer, because we don't have all the facts. We don't know the facts from the CO's point of view.
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
November 29th, 2015, 08:05 PM
#19

Originally Posted by
finsfurfeathers
Actually not illegal. You can carry lead as long as you don't use it on waterfowl. There was an article in the OOD magazine that went over the interpretation as per Mr. Critchlow.
I'd love to read his interpretation. Right from the EC website:
"Since September 1, 1999, the possession or use of lead shot while hunting most migratory game birds has been banned in all areas in Canada."
-
November 29th, 2015, 08:05 PM
#20
I don't think they were doing anything wrong until such time as they stepped out of the vehicle and shot a bird however I'll hazard a guess that they were charged with not wearing proper hunter orange (not that they should have been).