Will This Happen In Canada ?

[jaycee]

Muslim Truckers Refuse to Deliver Beer.......

After Muslim Truckers Refuse to Deliver Beer? Obama Does the Unbelievable by Bill Callen | Top Right News

Barack Obama just sided with Muslims to enforce Islamic Sharia Law on an American business, leaving many outraged and two Fox News anchors absolutely stunned.

Two Muslim truck drivers ? former Somali ?refugees? ? refused to make deliveries of beer to stores for their employer. So they were understandably fired They claimed it was a violation of their religious beliefs ? even though Islam bars only the consumption of alcohol. And, as the employer pointed out, the workers knew they would have to deliver alcohol before they took the job.

So guess what Barack Obama did.

He SUED the employers it on behalf of the pair, Mahad Abass Mohamed and Abdkiarim Hassan Bulshale, claiming religious discrimination.

Obama?s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) represented them in the case, providing tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars in legal support, judicial filings and court appearances against the employer who was hopelessly outgunned by the Federal government.

And this week the Muslims were awarded a stunning $240,000 by a jury, presided over by an Obama appointee who stunned analysts by allowing the case to go forward at all.

Fox News hosts Megyn Kelly and Andrew Napolitano were flabbergasted:
[IMG]tmtb://tmtoolbar/en-us/SRResource/webicon_green.png[/IMG]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I3q61Y85oCw

?The Obama administration actually represented the two Muslims in this case. But has sometimes taken a very different position in the case of Christians trying to assert their religious beliefs.?

She then said to Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano:
?So in the case of the Muslim truck drivers, the Obama administration through the EEOC is all in. This is what they said:
?We are proud to support the rights of workers to equal treatment in the workplace without having to sacrifice their religious beliefs or practices; it?s fundamental to the American principles of religious freedom and tolerance.?
But when it comes to the Christian bakers, it?s not as fundamental.?

Napolitano was equally perplexed:
?That?s correct. It?s unfortunate when the government interferes in a private dispute over religious views, and takes sides, and chooses one religion over another.? To their point, the Christian owners of ?Melissa?s Sweet Cakes? were fined $135,000 by the state of Oregon for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple. And Kentucky clerk Kim Davis was jailed for refusing to issue same-sex marriage licenses.

Napolitano offered an explanation for the administration?s interest in the Muslim truck driver case:
?The way the feds intervened ? they wanted this case because they wanted to make the point that they've now made.?
The U.S. Government and the courts can't legally have one set of laws for Christians and another set of laws for Muslims and other religious groups. But now they do. Obama?s actions and this court?s ruling throws into relief that not all Americans are legally recognized as possessing religious liberty and freedom of conscience.
As George Orwell might put it, Obama has now established that
Muslims are more equal than Christians in America.

[terrym]

The new refugees will get dental and vision care. I was born here and paid taxes my entire life but don't have that benefit and never will.

[Fisherman]

They let them in the country and we are doing the same here.

[awndray]

The new refugees will get dental and vision care. I was born here and paid taxes my entire life but don't have that benefit and never will.

I would love to know the source of this drivel.

[terrym]

I would love to know the source of this drivel.

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/ca...-conservatives

[awndray]

Amazing. Retirees who've paid a lifetime of taxes can't even get those "free" services and these idiots want to give them away to anyone with a refugee status.

Edit: I just did a very quick Google search into the past. It's actually not free health, dental and vision care for all refugees. It's emergency care, just like any of us are entitled to.

http://www.doctorsforrefugeecare.ca/the-issue.html

I'd have to look into it further, but I don't think emergency care is unreasonable at all.

Edit: Reading further, it looks like we're paying for a whole lot of stuff.

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/refugee.../apply-who.asp

[Bushmoose]

Awndray, please make up your mind, you're making us dizzy? First you say TerryM post is "drivel". Then you say's it's "amazing" retirees cant get the same benefits? Then it's " Emergency care is not unreasonable". Now finally you agree, we are paying for a whole lot of stuff? Finished yet?

[awndray]

Did you not see my edits? Is there a rule about changing one's opinion around here? Relax. This is a human typing; not a robot.

[Fisherman]

He's from Ottawa, the Trudeau effect is already rubbing off on him.

[Bushmoose]

Did you not see my edits? Is there a rule about changing one's opinion around here? Relax. This is a human typing; not a robot.

Well actually, I did see your edits. Hence, the confusion? Get it figured out yet?