Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 89

Thread: Yet another dog attack.

  1. #61
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by last5oh_302 View Post
    AThere's ALWAYS more to the story, and it usually includes abuse, and this kind of "data" is never included in dog attack/bite stats
    Presumably you have data to support your claim, and are not simply making an ideological statement based on selective evidence.
    "The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
    -- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #62
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by welsh View Post
    Presumably you have data to support your claim, and are not simply making an ideological statement based on selective evidence.
    Nope, ideological based on selective evidence. If you can't beat them, join them.

  4. #63
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    So sad .

  5. #64
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Yup just like..... guns don't kill people,........ would it be, dogs attack stoned people, or, stoned dogs attack people, or, stoned dogs attack stoned people?...And, since when is threatening ( I am going to give you bath, I am going to take you to the pound), or yelling at your dog abuse? LOL.
    Last edited by fishermccann; January 3rd, 2016 at 01:10 PM.

  6. #65
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    It's like those Mom's that refuse to accept their kid is a chithead as the bailiffs take him off to prison..."he's just misunderstood"... HaHa.

  7. #66
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Thing is a gun won't break out of your vault and maim or kill a dog or person. Many Pitt attacks are escaped family dogs who snap.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  8. #67
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Considering Ontario has a Pitbull ban in effect, it sure is easy to buy one.

    http://www.hoobly.com/6360/1689/10/
    Rick

  9. #68
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by last5oh_302 View Post
    Considering Ontario has a Pitbull ban in effect, it sure is easy to buy one.

    http://www.hoobly.com/6360/1689/10/
    The pitbull ban is just another useless unenforcable piece of "feel-good" legislation. I see people walking them all over the place,all the time. I've spoken with folks and they all say "Oh,this is a cross with (enter ficticious breed here) so,it's OK." Meanwhile,the dog is acting aggressively. Dumb people,just simply dumb.

  10. #69
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    It's like those Mom's that refuse to accept their kid is a chithead as the bailiffs take him off to prison..."he's just misunderstood"... HaHa.
    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    Yup just like..... guns don't kill people,........ would it be, dogs attack stoned people, or, stoned dogs attack people, or, stoned dogs attack stoned people?...And, since when is threatening ( I am going to give you bath, I am going to take you to the pound), or yelling at your dog abuse? LOL.
    Quote Originally Posted by terrym View Post
    Thing is a gun won't break out of your vault and maim or kill a dog or person. Many Pitt attacks are escaped family dogs who snap.
    So when the same liberals that banned pit bulls ban semi-auto firearms is everybody going to be ok with it ?
    Bad, ineffective legislation is always the wrong solution.
    If someone owns a pit bull and makes it into a vicious dog and it attacks someone then do the hard work and investigate and charge them.
    The same for firearms. There are sufficient laws on the books now to prosecute gun crimes but liberal judges keep giving out slaps on the wrists.

    Legislation is not always the answer to our problems.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  11. #70
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Some people should not have dogs, and some people should not have guns, it is not a right. Maybe investigate first, before trouble starts. Some would say it is none of the governments business and then complain when unqualified people access the things they should not. Write a test for a possibly deadly gun, write a test for a possibly deadly dog. And no you can't stop people from having a possibly deadly offspring, no test needed there.
    Last edited by fishermccann; January 3rd, 2016 at 09:10 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •