-
January 3rd, 2016, 12:30 PM
#61

Originally Posted by
last5oh_302
AThere's ALWAYS more to the story, and it usually includes abuse, and this kind of "data" is never included in dog attack/bite stats
Presumably you have data to support your claim, and are not simply making an ideological statement based on selective evidence.
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
January 3rd, 2016 12:30 PM
# ADS
-
January 3rd, 2016, 12:37 PM
#62

Originally Posted by
welsh
Presumably you have data to support your claim, and are not simply making an ideological statement based on selective evidence.
Nope, ideological based on selective evidence. If you can't beat them, join them.
-
January 3rd, 2016, 12:38 PM
#63
Has too much time on their hands
So sad .
-
January 3rd, 2016, 12:55 PM
#64
Yup just like..... guns don't kill people,........ would it be, dogs attack stoned people, or, stoned dogs attack people, or, stoned dogs attack stoned people?...And, since when is threatening ( I am going to give you bath, I am going to take you to the pound), or yelling at your dog abuse? LOL.
Last edited by fishermccann; January 3rd, 2016 at 01:10 PM.
-
January 3rd, 2016, 01:05 PM
#65
It's like those Mom's that refuse to accept their kid is a chithead as the bailiffs take him off to prison..."he's just misunderstood"... HaHa.
-
January 3rd, 2016, 01:10 PM
#66
Thing is a gun won't break out of your vault and maim or kill a dog or person. Many Pitt attacks are escaped family dogs who snap.
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
January 3rd, 2016, 02:23 PM
#67
Considering Ontario has a Pitbull ban in effect, it sure is easy to buy one.
http://www.hoobly.com/6360/1689/10/
-
January 3rd, 2016, 07:35 PM
#68

Originally Posted by
last5oh_302
The pitbull ban is just another useless unenforcable piece of "feel-good" legislation. I see people walking them all over the place,all the time. I've spoken with folks and they all say "Oh,this is a cross with (enter ficticious breed here) so,it's OK." Meanwhile,the dog is acting aggressively. Dumb people,just simply dumb.
-
January 3rd, 2016, 07:43 PM
#69

Originally Posted by
MikePal
It's like those Mom's that refuse to accept their kid is a chithead as the bailiffs take him off to prison..."he's just misunderstood"... HaHa.

Originally Posted by
fishermccann
Yup just like..... guns don't kill people,........ would it be, dogs attack stoned people, or, stoned dogs attack people, or, stoned dogs attack stoned people?...And, since when is threatening ( I am going to give you bath, I am going to take you to the pound), or yelling at your dog abuse? LOL.

Originally Posted by
terrym
Thing is a gun won't break out of your vault and maim or kill a dog or person. Many Pitt attacks are escaped family dogs who snap.
So when the same liberals that banned pit bulls ban semi-auto firearms is everybody going to be ok with it ?
Bad, ineffective legislation is always the wrong solution.
If someone owns a pit bull and makes it into a vicious dog and it attacks someone then do the hard work and investigate and charge them.
The same for firearms. There are sufficient laws on the books now to prosecute gun crimes but liberal judges keep giving out slaps on the wrists.
Legislation is not always the answer to our problems.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
January 3rd, 2016, 08:55 PM
#70
Some people should not have dogs, and some people should not have guns, it is not a right. Maybe investigate first, before trouble starts. Some would say it is none of the governments business and then complain when unqualified people access the things they should not. Write a test for a possibly deadly gun, write a test for a possibly deadly dog. And no you can't stop people from having a possibly deadly offspring, no test needed there.
Last edited by fishermccann; January 3rd, 2016 at 09:10 PM.