Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Volume vs weight - powder loads

  1. #21
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Forgive my ignorance as I have no real experience with loose powder. I bought a super cheap scale, weighed out 70 grains of Blackhorn and called it a day. Now I see most powder is measured by volume by most people. I can't see how this would be more accurate.... is it more convenient? Thanks!

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #22
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sullyy View Post
    Forgive my ignorance as I have no real experience with loose powder. I bought a super cheap scale, weighed out 70 grains of Blackhorn and called it a day. Now I see most powder is measured by volume by most people. I can't see how this would be more accurate.... is it more convenient? Thanks!
    How did you arrive at 70 grains by weight as your load? Most recipes I saw called for amount by volume.
    it is more convenient to do it by volume if you carry a powder measure rather than a scale in the field or at the range.

  4. #23
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    You can choice either way to measure your powder, but most people use volumetric measures. The link I posted back in post #12 explains the difference.

    I ended up using a brass sliding measure that isn't even marked....I just kept trying settings till I found what worked best and just set it at the that spot for loading. I eventually measure it and found out it provided 80grs of T7.

  5. #24
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Got it thanks.

    "How did you arrive at 70 grains by weight as your load?"

    I used to shoot 100 grains of 777 (2 pellets) so started with that. According to the blackhorn site 100 grains volume is 70 grains by weight. So I weighed out a dozen 70 grain charges and at 65 yards the first 3 shots were touching on the paper. I shot a deer at 25 yards a week later and haven't shot it since. I might have to change loads when (if) I start shooting further, but so far so good!

  6. #25
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Makes total sense sullyy. I checked and my scale said 100gr volume was 74gr by weight with BH 209.

  7. #26
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    I noticed last year that Randy Wakeman when using BlackHorn209 he loads by weight in his reviews of the Ultimate.

    Not sure why he uses weight vs volumetric with that powder. I don't remember him doing that with T7.
    I'm guessing because they're two totally different powder compositions. As in one's BP sub and one's a deriv of smokeless

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •