-
March 8th, 2016, 07:41 AM
#11
Originally Posted by
blasted_saber
Skewing poll results doesnt have any value to me. Id rsther get a notion of what actual public perception is (yes, I realize it could be skewed the otherway too).
So? Did you vote? Sure it's a goofy poll but if you're going to read the ridiculous article then why not vote. It's bull#*it articles like this - over and over - that sway the rest of the undecided. Our complacency has gotten us to where we are today!
If you keep doing what you've always done. You'll keep getting what you've always got!
Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
-
March 8th, 2016 07:41 AM
# ADS
-
March 8th, 2016, 07:54 AM
#12
Anti's are well know for skewing results.
Originally Posted by
blasted_saber
Skewing poll results doesnt have any value to me. Id rsther get a notion of what actual public perception is (yes, I realize it could be skewed the otherway too).
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
March 8th, 2016, 09:42 AM
#13
SK33T3R, Thanks for posting, what a one sided article and slanting of the facts. Same misinformation style campaign they use against us in regards to African hunting being applied here.
-
March 8th, 2016, 10:59 AM
#14
Originally Posted by
SK33T3R
Interesting argument by increasing the cull of wolves, rather than reducing their numbers, it leads to the breakdown of pack units and ends up fostering splinter groups, which leads to the development of additional packs and in turn increases the level of predation on the local herbivores. If there is any veracity to this, and there just might be having read studies on wolf family units, then it would be better to retain the current limits on the number of wolves that can be culled. Otherwise you can continue to watch the decline in the numbers of moose tags being made available. Of course, if you would rather dine on wolf instead of moose by all means vote against this proposal. But just maybe, you should be voting in favour it.
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut
Last edited by Gun Nut; March 8th, 2016 at 11:03 AM.
-
March 8th, 2016, 11:37 AM
#15
Has too much time on their hands
I'm not too sure what you guys were expected but 40/60 is actually a pretty good result!
I bet that for 90% of people, wolf should have priority on us. Meaning, we got grocery store and they don't......
-
March 8th, 2016, 04:27 PM
#16
-
March 9th, 2016, 09:44 PM
#17
Attachment 32285We shot this wolf on Sunday.
The anti's were winning the bear pole too and look what happened!!
You were always able to take 2 wolves a year. Still only 2 wolves, what's the problem??
-
March 10th, 2016, 11:28 PM
#18
-
March 10th, 2016, 11:33 PM
#19
Yup voted.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
March 11th, 2016, 10:12 AM
#20
Originally Posted by
Snowwalker
Yup voted.
Why is there a collar on that supposed wolf ?
Reply With Quote
