-
October 13th, 2016, 05:55 PM
#1
Caesar Milan
Not a thread to say nasty things about Caesar, but I got a good laugh the other night.
I watch his shows occasionally ; you can usually learn something.
He had an out of control American Bulldog - chased horses on the farm.
He tried several things to fix the problem , and then brought out an e collar for training purposes , the use of which he explained well.
At the end they always show how changed the dog is. Yes, he just sat their calm as the horses raised around.
"Amazing change."
Then I noticed the e collar was still on the dog.
" We are more than our gender, skin color, class, sexuality or age; we are unlimited potential, and can not be defined by one label." quote A. Bartlett
-
October 13th, 2016 05:55 PM
# ADS
-
October 14th, 2016, 03:39 AM
#2
Not sure why you find that observation worthy of note Sharon.
Isn't that the point of those collars, a behavioral deterrent.
Last edited by MikePal; October 14th, 2016 at 03:41 AM.
-
October 14th, 2016, 08:25 AM
#3
By the end of each show, the dog is always shown to have miraculously become an obedient companion, with behavioral issues resolved. This is supposedly done through verbal and physical correction and reinforcement of the dogs place in the pack. In this case, it appears those methods didn't work 100%, hence the collar. I can see why Sharon got a chuckle from it.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy." Ernest Benn
-
October 14th, 2016, 09:12 AM
#4
i remember that episode well from a while ago. i dont think they are making new epsisodes, but i could be wrong.
he acknowledges that sometimes in an off leash environment, you cannot reach out and touch the dog, so therefore additional tools are necessary. i know my dog acts completely different when he doesnt have his pinch collar on out in public on leash, and takes a few more chances with me, when the collar is not on. and i rarely have to use it, but have in the past.
In the short time he spent with the dog, it probably still needed the collar for further conditioning.
i used to be a huge fan of cesar milan, until you realize he is one of those people that just has a way with dogs, that cannot be matched by most others. i think a lot of his techniques are good and he has done a lot to educate the general public about proper handling, but they work extra well since he has this "sixth sense" with dogs. but i am no dog expert, and my dog is far from perfect.
My name is BOWJ..... and I am a waterfowl addict!
-
October 14th, 2016, 09:41 AM
#5
show is show and from that perspective you are right that it would have been more stunning if they've taken it off. however, from the perspective of training that dog, why would you?
my dog doesn't need an e-collar (e.g. can call her off game or anything else for that matter), but I put one on to keep it that way - just to notice that the batteries are long empty when I finally do press the button LOL
-
October 15th, 2016, 08:31 AM
#6

Originally Posted by
MikePal
Not sure why you find that observation worthy of note Sharon.
Isn't that the point of those collars, a behavioral deterrent.
Because, as the Brits say, the goal is to work the dog 'naked'. If the dog is wearing the toys, it usually means it cannot be trusted, i.e. it's not trained.
"The dog is Small Munsterlander, the gun is Beretta."
"You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed" A. Saint-Exupery.
-
October 15th, 2016, 09:06 AM
#7
Ive never needed an e collar or choke chain. My dog is just as behaved off leash as on leash. I guess thats where knowledge, hard work and serious training differ from quick fixes. I can garuntee if you booted the dog in the arse as hard as you could when it chased the cows it would have the same effect on the dog as the ecollar, or pinching its ears or slapping its snout. Negative reinforcement works its just not the preferred method and doesnt have long lasting effects like positive reinforcement. There are things I taught my shepherd 5 years ago and she instantly recalls how to perform them even when its been years since I last said the command. Shes getting old now and I prefer to let her make up her own rules and alot more easy going with her now and have yet to see any behavioural changes. Positive reinforcement is more initial work whereas negative reinforcement can have immediate effects but negative reinforcement needs constant reminders and is more work in the long run. Best to do it right or not at all!
Last edited by Deer Wrastler; October 15th, 2016 at 09:09 AM.
-
October 16th, 2016, 08:15 AM
#8
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
vom Dufenshmirtz
Because, as the Brits say, the goal is to work the dog 'naked'. If the dog is wearing the toys, it usually means it cannot be trusted, i.e. it's not trained.
I prefer to work naked...the dog that is.
-
October 16th, 2016, 10:30 AM
#9
the dog prefers when you work naked? hmm.... might be onto something here
Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
-
October 16th, 2016, 11:09 AM
#10

Originally Posted by
Deer Wrastler
Ive never needed an e collar or choke chain. My dog is just as behaved off leash as on leash. I guess thats where knowledge, hard work and serious training differ from quick fixes. I can garuntee if you booted the dog in the arse as hard as you could when it chased the cows it would have the same effect on the dog as the ecollar, or pinching its ears or slapping its snout. Negative reinforcement works its just not the preferred method and doesnt have long lasting effects like positive reinforcement. There are things I taught my shepherd 5 years ago and she instantly recalls how to perform them even when its been years since I last said the command. Shes getting old now and I prefer to let her make up her own rules and alot more easy going with her now and have yet to see any behavioural changes. Positive reinforcement is more initial work whereas negative reinforcement can have immediate effects but negative reinforcement needs constant reminders and is more work in the long run. Best to do it right or not at all!
Glad you've had good training experiences with your dog.
I do disagree with your position around neg/pos reinforcement for training. Quite to the contrary negative reinforcement is not required on a constant basis to reinforce the desired response .And as far as eliciting a desired response ....well that is built on keeping a high standard in your training after sound teaching.
No question with the e collar you can reach out and touch them far from the reach of your boot and being more humane.
I rather doubt you've trained a dog with an ecollar or you would have responded about their effectiveness. But hey what works ...works and if you can accomplish training without one and with a great level of compliance...then great. But with much higher expectations for our dogs especially in competitions then you've handicapped yourself immensely with your training. The ecollar supports higher level training which goes well beyond pet expectations just as an example.
Training your shepherd some basics is a far cry from training retrievers and others in various pursuits. You might want to talk to other trainers like those those involved in K-9 training and see how they view the positive /negative response training.
In Canada and the US there are trainers who have trained the'Amish' way which is certainly their choice but have had almost no success in competitions as a general rule.