Rittenhouse trial

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by js4fn

Mean while black panthers are outside Joggers ahmaud arbery murder trial with ak47’s and displaying coffins with accused names on them

Defence just called for mistrial

---

Please cite the source of your information?

Is this the same defense lawyer who is almost in contempt of court by demanding the trial Judge exclude the presence of black pastors in the same public courtroom.

Can you imagine a defense lawyer who is so inept that he would try and have the case narrative be about race, when the prosecutor has not used race in the trial but has focused her attention on the actions of the accused and their weak story about self defense.

Three WHITE men armed with firearms, pretending they are COPS and making a citizens arrest on an unarmed jogger, who happened to be born as a black man.

These three COWARDS did not even have the grounds to make any arrest.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bushwhacker

This seems to be a common viewpoint from police officers or former police officers like yourself. "Just let us handle it"

---

That's what they said when we got into our accident lol. We solved it before them too bad we were still not allowed to see the video.



Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilroy

Please cite the source of your information?

Is this the same defense lawyer who is almost in contempt of court by demanding the trial Judge exclude the presence of black pastors in the same public courtroom.

Can you imagine a defense lawyer who is so inept that he would try and have the case narrative be about race, when the prosecutor has not used race in the trial but has focused her attention on the actions of the accused and their weak story about self defense.

Three WHITE men armed with firearms, pretending they are COPS and making a citizens arrest on an unarmed jogger, who happened to be born as a black man.

These three COWARDS did not even have the grounds to make any arrest.

---

On tv gilroy been watching the trial HLN

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by js4fn

On tv gilroy been watching the trial HLN

---

An art installation in the shape of a casket with the names of Black people who have been killed in incidents involving police violence was also placed outside the courthouse. Malik Barlow, a marketing consultant speaking for artist Darrell Kelley, said the casket is a "metaphor," and a way for the artist to exercise his First Amendment rights.

https://edition.cnn.com/us/live-news...-21/index.html

All depends on what channel your watching.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilroy

An art installation in the shape of a casket with the names of Black people who have been killed in incidents involving police violence was also placed outside the courthouse. Malik Barlow, a marketing consultant speaking for artist Darrell Kelley, said the casket is a "metaphor," and a way for the artist to exercise his First Amendment rights.

https://edition.cnn.com/us/live-news...-21/index.html

All depends on what channel your watching.

---

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...b6586078b9.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smitty55

You still didn't respond why you think he actually went looking for trouble just because he was carrying a firearm. If those goons hadn't attacked him it's a safe bet nothing would have happened, they are the ones you should be blaming.

---

Smitty….he wasn’t “just carrying a firearm”…..he took a loaded firearm to the scene of a riot, with the intention of intervening. As I said…sitting on a front porch to defend property with that firearm is perfectly justified…what he did was go looking for trouble…..and just to be clear I blame everyone including the police and civilian authorities…they have jobs to do and failed.

I’m surprised that you don’t see it this way, but I guess we’ll have to disagree.

When the Proud Boys and the Black Panthers have a shoot out I hope it is on TV so we can see it - should be good

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilroy

I have no idea why the moderators have not looked at the shear number of his past posts name calling other members on this forum and the useless posts that simply attack and insult other members.

---

I just figured he wanted to make sure I knew he was ignoring me. Why I have no idea. I won’t be losing any sleep over it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 73hunter

Smitty….he wasn’t “just carrying a firearm”…..he took a loaded firearm to the scene of a riot, with the intention of intervening. As I said…sitting on a front porch to defend property with that firearm is perfectly justified…what he did was go looking for trouble…..and just to be clear I blame everyone including the police and civilian authorities…they have jobs to do and failed.

I’m surprised that you don’t see it this way, but I guess we’ll have to disagree.

---

Yep I disagree with you on that one. I don't see anything that makes me assume like you do that he went looking for trouble, simply legally carrying a firearm like many other people there doesn't imply that to me. What I do believe is that if those goons hadn't attacked him those altercations wouldn't have happened. He certainly wasn't the instigator like he would have been had he been looking for trouble as you keep assuming, but without evidence.
Btw Mark, It sure wouldn't have made any sense to bring an unloaded firearm to a riot now would it, just sayin' ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smitty55

Yep I disagree with you on that one. I don't see anything that makes me assume like you do that he went looking for trouble, simply legally carrying a firearm like many other people there doesn't imply that to me. What I do believe is that if those goons hadn't attacked him those altercations wouldn't have happened. He certainly wasn't the instigator like he would have been had he been looking for trouble as you keep assuming, but without evidence.
Btw Mark, It sure wouldn't have made any sense to bring an unloaded firearm to a riot now would it, just sayin' ;)

---

1 thing your missing is that it wasn't his gun and he wasn't legally allowed to have one apperantly. Judge didn't allow any of that into the trial though.

I do agree when looking at this knowing the American laws that it was self defense at the end of the day there though.

Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk