I thought he was in it for the puck bunnies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameracutter
Printable View
I thought he was in it for the puck bunnies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameracutter
My understanding was that it was basically a shot of the back of her head while she was going down on him.The big problem was when he shared the picture and most importantly her personal info like her name. I also heard that he did pay a fine in Sweden for his act but I'm not positive about that one.Quote:
Originally Posted by gbk
X2 Smitty.Quote:
Originally Posted by smitty55
That is what i could find out also.
lets get the facts shall we...
Quote:
Mailloux shared the photo in the SK Lejon team group chat on SnapChat during a bus ride to a road game. According to the investigation, the victim was not identified in the photo. A witness interviewed said in the investigation that the photo only made visible “the hair of the girl … you saw that it was a girl, and you glimpsed bra straps,” according to the report.
Quote:
But when Mailloux shared the photo to SK Lejon teammates, according to the report, he also sent a screenshot of the victim’s online profile, which identified her to teammates by displaying her photo, first name and age.
Word quickly spread. The victim soon confronted Mailloux and his teammates, who claimed to delete the photo, according to the investigation. The offense was reported to police and the victim’s attorney filed a claim asking the Swedish prosecutor to order Mailloux to pay 7,000 Swedish krona (~$800 U.S. Dollars) for “offensive photography” and 30,000 Swedish krona (~$3,500 U.S. Dollars) for defamation. In Sweden, part of the fine for a crime such as this one is payable to the victim.
Mailloux was not arrested by Swedish Polisen. Mailloux was ultimately charged with both defamation and “Kränkande fotografering,” or offensive photography, and ordered to pay 14,300 Swedish krona, approximately $1,650 U.S. Dollars, by way of a criminal injunction that relieved the matter from the court system. Offensive photography became illegal in Sweden in 2013, banning secretly photographing or filming someone in a private place. The penalty is a fine or a maximum of up to two years in Sweden.
Quote:
However, Mailloux also told investigators in the report: “Logan said he had met [the victim] after this [incident] and that she told him that she wanted to ruin his career. Logan explained that the NHL Draft is [on the] way and that she knows this and that it is sensitive.”
The story: https://www.dailyfaceoff.com/nhl-dra...rge-in-sweden/Quote:
"Mailloux said he has sought biweekly counseling with a licensed psychologist since returning from Sweden. A"]Mailloux said he has sought biweekly counseling with a licensed psychologist since returning from Sweden.
As a young man he does something stupid, admits to it, is contrite, apologizes to the young lady, the prosecutors order him to pay the fines, he does. Gets counseling. But worst of all..His mother found out.
She says he embarrassed her and wants to ruin his career...she succeeds.
Same article…
“According to the report, the victim claimed Mailloux told her he sent the photo to his teammates as “a trophy” and that he did it because of “pressure from the guys.”
The victim also said in the investigation that the photo was damaging because she was “no longer anonymous,” and that even if players on SK Lejon deleted the image as they said, the incident would not “stay” within the team as Mailloux and his teammates suggested to her. She said it damaged her reputation as gossip filtered out to others in town.”
Interesting that the article lists her as “the victim” twice. But GN says Mailloux is the victim.
Once again, an example of the term gaslighting.
I don't think you're using the term "gaslighting" properly in the context of the article...or situation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameracutter
The article doesn't try to sway any bias or opinion...it's actually a pretty good piece of journalism.Quote:
Gaslighting is a tactic in which a person or entity, in order to gain more power, makes a victim question their reality.
Not the article, GunNut’s claims that Mailloux is the victim in this.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
Totally agreed. This guilty by social platforms is total BS. Let the courts decide what is right and wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun Nut
And, Turdeau is a moron ... he has no right to speak. He is a filthy human being, and definitely not where we
should be looking for moral standards.
That's NOT gaslighting either...Quote:
Originally Posted by Cameracutter
He is a victim...he's this week focus of the 'cancel culture' who will do all they can to destroy this young mans future for a youthful indiscretion which he since took ownership of and has been punished for.
Thank god there was NO social media when I played Jr A hockey in the 90’s lol…this is whole thing is ridiculous. Btw, Trudeau is a complete idiot for even commenting of this!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk