How COVID-19 impacts the fully vaccinated

Printable View

Show 200 post(s) from this thread on one page

August 22nd, 2021, 12:53 PM
warpipe

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/world...a-84a48ef9309f Mississippi is in an awful mess with 5000 new cases Friday.
August 22nd, 2021, 01:11 PM
impact

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/irref...enLZdttc9.html

"Fred Corbin, you are a Real Hero!!👏👏👏👏
He has ⁣leaked Pfizer jab documents & access to the Wuhan labs "deleted" database!"
August 22nd, 2021, 01:22 PM
FishHog

Quote:

Originally Posted by smitty55

As for your conspiracy theory comment don't you find it strange that pretty well all of them have now been proven to be true, or did you just happen to miss that part?

Did I make a conspiracy theory comment?
August 22nd, 2021, 01:25 PM
MikePal

Quote:

Originally Posted by warpipe

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/world...a-84a48ef9309f Mississippi is in an awful mess with 5000 new cases Friday.

First off always look at the numbers for perspective.

Population of Mississippi is 3 million
Hospitalizations; 1,600 or 0.05% of the population.
In ICU; 452 or 0.015%
Covid deaths to date: 8,000 or 0.26 of population.

Those aren't huge numbers, in fact, similar to what the city of Ottawa was going the during the peak of the 3rd wave (other than death rate).

Only 36% of the population is vaccinated, so more opportunities for the virus to take hold.

The interesting part of the story is how many are taking (illegal) ivermectin. If the CDC has allowed that drug to be used as a therapeutic for Covid, then they would have had access to a proven Human version of the drug.
August 22nd, 2021, 01:27 PM
WillieBeno

Quote:

Originally Posted by impact

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/irref...enLZdttc9.html

"Fred Corbin, you are a Real Hero!!��
He has ⁣leaked Pfizer jab documents & access to the Wuhan labs "deleted" database!"

Doesn't Jeff Bezzos own the Washington Post?
August 22nd, 2021, 01:32 PM
FishHog

Quote:

Originally Posted by smitty55

I think you must be misremembering.

Monday, November 09, 2020 - 06:45am
Vaccine candidate was found to be more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19 in participants without evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first interim efficacy analysis

I guess I never took a 1 in 10 chance as a guaranteed cure when I read this in November

Maybe others took it differently

I’m not trying to argue and I could care less what others do and I sure don’t think vaccine should be mandated

I just didn’t get why people keep being surprised when someone who is vaccinated still catches COVID
August 22nd, 2021, 02:01 PM
MikePal

Quote:

Originally Posted by FishHog

I just didn’t get why people keep being surprised when someone who is vaccinated still catches COVID

I think the people who were lead to believe that they would be 97% protected were a little surprised to find out after 4 months it was really only 37% :)
August 22nd, 2021, 02:09 PM
finsfurfeathers

Quote:

Originally Posted by smitty55

I think you must be misremembering. Like Mike said when both these mRNA gene therapies came out they were very clear and quick to point out that they were both around 97% effective in preventing covid. That sure sounds like they clearly said it would prevent you from catching covid.
As for your conspiracy theory comment don't you find it strange that pretty well all of them have now been proven to be true, or did you just happen to miss that part?

I always thought 100% was a garantee. 97% sure sounds like they clearly said there's a 3 % chance of catching covid.
How I see when it comes to my own harm reduction outcome there is no one thing that will give 100% protection. Using as many layers as you can comes the closest.
Vax , don't vax your chioce and so you must also live withing societal protocols. Freedoms and rights do come with concequences for the choices you make. At the moment its vax, get tested, or remove yourself from public contact.
If you don't want to be preached at don't preach too others.
August 22nd, 2021, 02:18 PM
FishHog

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikePal

I think the people who were lead to believe that they would be 97% protected were a little surprised to find out after 4 months it was really only 37% :)

Yeah for sure and that is disappointing but not really surprising when variants come out after the vaccine was produced
August 22nd, 2021, 02:22 PM
MikePal

Quote:

Originally Posted by finsfurfeathers

I always thought 100% was a garantee. 97% sure sounds like they clearly said there's a 3 % chance of catching covid.

But what they weren't expecting to find out it really the efficacy of it was only 37% after 4 months. That's because they never ran trials to find that out before they suck it in the arms of naive trusting people.

I like how the conversation has now turned to the 'haves' making excuses for a vaccine they put all their faith in. HaHa..

Show 200 post(s) from this thread on one page