Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 54

Thread: How COVID-19 impacts the fully vaccinated

  1. #21
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    https://ottawacitizen.com/news/world...a-84a48ef9309f Mississippi is in an awful mess with 5000 new cases Friday.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #22
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    https://brandnewtube.com/watch/irref...enLZdttc9.html

    "Fred Corbin, you are a Real Hero!!👏👏👏👏
    He has ⁣leaked Pfizer jab documents & access to the Wuhan labs "deleted" database!"

  4. #23
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty55 View Post
    As for your conspiracy theory comment don't you find it strange that pretty well all of them have now been proven to be true, or did you just happen to miss that part?
    Did I make a conspiracy theory comment?

  5. #24
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by warpipe View Post
    https://ottawacitizen.com/news/world...a-84a48ef9309f Mississippi is in an awful mess with 5000 new cases Friday.
    First off always look at the numbers for perspective.

    Population of Mississippi is 3 million
    Hospitalizations; 1,600 or 0.05% of the population.
    In ICU; 452 or 0.015%
    Covid deaths to date: 8,000 or 0.26 of population.

    Those aren't huge numbers, in fact, similar to what the city of Ottawa was going the during the peak of the 3rd wave (other than death rate).

    Only 36% of the population is vaccinated, so more opportunities for the virus to take hold.

    The interesting part of the story is how many are taking (illegal) ivermectin. If the CDC has allowed that drug to be used as a therapeutic for Covid, then they would have had access to a proven Human version of the drug.

  6. #25
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by impact View Post
    https://brandnewtube.com/watch/irref...enLZdttc9.html

    "Fred Corbin, you are a Real Hero!!��������
    He has ⁣leaked Pfizer jab documents & access to the Wuhan labs "deleted" database!"
    Doesn't Jeff Bezzos own the Washington Post?

  7. #26
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty55 View Post
    I think you must be misremembering.
    Monday, November 09, 2020 - 06:45am
    Vaccine candidate was found to be more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19 in participants without evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first interim efficacy analysis


    I guess I never took a 1 in 10 chance as a guaranteed cure when I read this in November

    Maybe others took it differently

    I’m not trying to argue and I could care less what others do and I sure don’t think vaccine should be mandated

    I just didn’t get why people keep being surprised when someone who is vaccinated still catches COVID

  8. #27
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FishHog View Post
    I just didn’t get why people keep being surprised when someone who is vaccinated still catches COVID
    I think the people who were lead to believe that they would be 97% protected were a little surprised to find out after 4 months it was really only 37%
    Last edited by MikePal; August 22nd, 2021 at 02:04 PM.

  9. #28
    Mod Squad

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty55 View Post
    I think you must be misremembering. Like Mike said when both these mRNA gene therapies came out they were very clear and quick to point out that they were both around 97% effective in preventing covid. That sure sounds like they clearly said it would prevent you from catching covid.
    As for your conspiracy theory comment don't you find it strange that pretty well all of them have now been proven to be true, or did you just happen to miss that part?
    I always thought 100% was a garantee. 97% sure sounds like they clearly said there's a 3 % chance of catching covid.
    How I see when it comes to my own harm reduction outcome there is no one thing that will give 100% protection. Using as many layers as you can comes the closest.
    Vax , don't vax your chioce and so you must also live withing societal protocols. Freedoms and rights do come with concequences for the choices you make. At the moment its vax, get tested, or remove yourself from public contact.
    If you don't want to be preached at don't preach too others.
    Time in the outdoors is never wasted

  10. #29
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    I think the people who were lead to believe that they would be 97% protected were a little surprised to find out after 4 months it was really only 37%
    Yeah for sure and that is disappointing but not really surprising when variants come out after the vaccine was produced

  11. #30
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by finsfurfeathers View Post
    I always thought 100% was a garantee. 97% sure sounds like they clearly said there's a 3 % chance of catching covid.
    But what they weren't expecting to find out it really the efficacy of it was only 37% after 4 months. That's because they never ran trials to find that out before they suck it in the arms of naive trusting people.

    I like how the conversation has now turned to the 'haves' making excuses for a vaccine they put all their faith in. HaHa..

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •