A 'lone' gunman in a short sleeve shirt carrying that much firepower should be a real concern for any security team organizing an event...Quote:
Originally Posted by skypilot
Printable View
A 'lone' gunman in a short sleeve shirt carrying that much firepower should be a real concern for any security team organizing an event...Quote:
Originally Posted by skypilot
Guy doesn't smile much. Maybe he ripped out some short and curlys when he pulled it out ? :scream:
Gee Mikey, how's he get there? Transporter and just appear? Get serious, can you walk with anywhere near a normal enough gait to even fool Ray Charles with that technique?Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
Mikey..seriously ??
He moves rather well in the opening of the video, no awkward gate, wouldn't draw too much attention to himself in a crowd.
It wasn't posted to be critiqued; just shows how much can be hidden under very little clothing.
I agree a large amount can be hidden beneath clothing.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
Imagine what you can hide under a Niqab and robe?
Exactly, one might could walk up to the event mike mentioned in his post without any awkward gait to be discovered by a security detail dressed in a paranja or burka, not so easy in a short sleeve shirt with a 40" AR shoved down one's denim pants like in the video.Quote:
Originally Posted by terrym
Seems like an excellent argument to ban the AR-15. :)
Be careful what you ask for.
It (AR 15) has been legal, what 3 different times in Canada? No legal reason to be restricted just another RCMP over reach due to its distant military geneology and Ryerson kooks like Wendy Cukier and Co.
The RCMP is not responsible for the fact it's restricted. It was restricted by order-in-council by Kim Campbell.Quote:
Originally Posted by skypilot
This is, for greater clarity, exactly what the CSSA lobbied for and got under C-42: a system in which guns are classified by cabinet, by order-in-council.
Now, perhaps someone could please explain why that provision of C-42 was such a good idea.