-
June 18th, 2016, 02:35 PM
#41
Originally Posted by
skypilot
How did they know he was unmarried? lol
A 'lone' gunman in a short sleeve shirt carrying that much firepower should be a real concern for any security team organizing an event...
-
June 18th, 2016 02:35 PM
# ADS
-
June 18th, 2016, 03:39 PM
#42
Guy doesn't smile much. Maybe he ripped out some short and curlys when he pulled it out ? 
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
June 18th, 2016, 04:42 PM
#43
Originally Posted by
MikePal
A 'lone' gunman in a short sleeve shirt carrying that much firepower should be a real concern for any security team organizing an event...
Gee Mikey, how's he get there? Transporter and just appear? Get serious, can you walk with anywhere near a normal enough gait to even fool Ray Charles with that technique?
-
June 18th, 2016, 05:05 PM
#44
Mikey..seriously ??
He moves rather well in the opening of the video, no awkward gate, wouldn't draw too much attention to himself in a crowd.
It wasn't posted to be critiqued; just shows how much can be hidden under very little clothing.
-
June 18th, 2016, 05:28 PM
#45
Originally Posted by
MikePal
Mikey..seriously ??
He moves rather well in the opening of the video, no awkward gate, wouldn't draw too much attention to himself in a crowd.
It wasn't posted to be critiqued; just shows how much can be hidden under very little clothing.
I agree a large amount can be hidden beneath clothing.
-
June 18th, 2016, 08:06 PM
#46
Imagine what you can hide under a Niqab and robe?
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
June 19th, 2016, 08:25 AM
#47
Originally Posted by
terrym
Imagine what you can hide under a Niqab and robe?
Exactly, one might could walk up to the event mike mentioned in his post without any awkward gait to be discovered by a security detail dressed in a paranja or burka, not so easy in a short sleeve shirt with a 40" AR shoved down one's denim pants like in the video.
-
June 19th, 2016, 09:35 AM
#48
Seems like an excellent argument to ban the AR-15. 
Be careful what you ask for.
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
June 19th, 2016, 09:48 AM
#49
It (AR 15) has been legal, what 3 different times in Canada? No legal reason to be restricted just another RCMP over reach due to its distant military geneology and Ryerson kooks like Wendy Cukier and Co.
-
June 19th, 2016, 11:10 AM
#50
Originally Posted by
skypilot
It (AR 15) has been legal, what 3 different times in Canada? No legal reason to be restricted just another RCMP over reach ....
The RCMP is not responsible for the fact it's restricted. It was restricted by order-in-council by Kim Campbell.
This is, for greater clarity, exactly what the CSSA lobbied for and got under C-42: a system in which guns are classified by cabinet, by order-in-council.
Now, perhaps someone could please explain why that provision of C-42 was such a good idea.
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
