Printable View
That's is what I've been saying to FC...he doesn't even entertain the possibility of the 'other side'..Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood
Have you got anything to support an alternative reason as to why they are clearly manipulating the data to create panic in the general population ? I'll be happy to read it.
Actually airports are open ... I personally know people who are flying.Quote:
Originally Posted by canadaman30
Just look at this link https://flightaware.com/live/Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkB
Lot's of planes in the air........I wonder where they are planning to land?
Here, take a stab at this recent example of manipulation..see if you can find the other side of the story:Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood
For a time they were testing 30-40,000 people a day, anyone who wanted one was encouraged to get a test done. The 'positivity' rate, ie those test that came back positive, were around 1.4%.
This number was to low to instil fear in the masses and wasn't even mentioned for months in the daily Covid updates. But people, like myself started to catch on by looking at the raw data from Health Ontario.
So they stopped testing everyone and limited it to testing only people with symptoms. Naturally the amount of test conducted dropped to about 6,000 a day. AND not surprisingly, the positivity rate jumped to 5% -6% . The media jumped on that number and politicians where happy to use it to implemented further restrictions...crippling the economy further.
Yup,,,correct again...Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
They could test more and more random. That would bring the numbers down per test. Also catch more cases .
As for testing more I mean what they are supposed to be testing per day that they are not. When you are still only testing 60 percent of your target you need to step up your game.
The random I mean they say up to 40 percent could be non symptomatic or show little to no symptoms yet these people will not be tested and spreading the virus.
They are only looking for 60 % of the virus leaving 40 to run out of control will they can't even reach their testing goals. Again they never really work on the whole problem. Just bits and pieces.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
I was being sarcastic...lolQuote:
Originally Posted by MarkB
Testing = Cases
Cases do not mean hospitalization or medical intervention
Stop the fear narrative
A good read... https://summit.news/2020/11/18/top-p...ecting-public/
Well Rick I did a quick check on the net,took about 2 minutes,I think Dr Hodskinson might have a little "conflict of interest".Quote:
Originally Posted by rick_iles
In your link he is working for a company making testing kits for Covid and in only the second link to him I found that:
For an initial $350, Malpractice Check will assign a doctor to interview the client and give a preliminary opinion about whether malpractice occurred. If the answer is yes, customers can pay another $700 and receive a more detailed analysis of medical documents.
The alternatives are hiring a lawyer – which could be expensive depending on how they’re paid – or complaining to one of the provincial colleges of physicians and surgeons, agencies that are ill-equipped to investigate alleged medical error, said Hodkinson.https://nationalpost.com/health/new-...table-mistakes
Also when contacted by the newspaper below we have the following:
The Western Standard tried to contact Hodkinson through his office, but when informed what the topic involved, a secretary said he was too busy all week.
A message has been left on his cell phone.
Alberta has had close to 41,000 cases of COVID-19 resulting in 427 deaths.
Dave Naylor is the News Editor of the Western Standard