Covid 2nd Wave....fact or fiction

[MikePal]

You have to look at both sides Mike

Can't just listed to one side of things when you are more open minded you can get a clearer picture of what's happening[emoji6].

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

That's is what I've been saying to FC...he doesn't even entertain the possibility of the 'other side'..

Have you got anything to support an alternative reason as to why they are clearly manipulating the data to create panic in the general population ? I'll be happy to read it.

[MarkB]

Nonsense, the airports are closed, it is the people who won't stay home and wear a mask that are the problem...lmao. Addto that all the new Canadians spreading the virus in the Liberal strongholds of Ontario, and its no wonder the virus is out of control.
Sad the spreaders are telling the smart responsible population how they should live.
Fishfood, I think if you steer clear of libs you probly won't need a mask...lol

Actually airports are open ... I personally know people who are flying.

[410001661]

Actually airports are open ... I personally know people who are flying.

Just look at this link https://flightaware.com/live/

Lot's of planes in the air........I wonder where they are planning to land?

[MikePal]

Can't just listed to one side of things when you are more open minded you can get a clearer picture of what's happening[emoji6].

Here, take a stab at this recent example of manipulation..see if you can find the other side of the story:

For a time they were testing 30-40,000 people a day, anyone who wanted one was encouraged to get a test done. The 'positivity' rate, ie those test that came back positive, were around 1.4%.

This number was to low to instil fear in the masses and wasn't even mentioned for months in the daily Covid updates. But people, like myself started to catch on by looking at the raw data from Health Ontario.

So they stopped testing everyone and limited it to testing only people with symptoms. Naturally the amount of test conducted dropped to about 6,000 a day. AND not surprisingly, the positivity rate jumped to 5% -6% . The media jumped on that number and politicians where happy to use it to implemented further restrictions...crippling the economy further.

[line052]

Yup,,,correct again...

Here, take a stab at this recent example of manipulation..see if you can find the other side of the story:

For a time they were testing 30-40,000 people a day, anyone who wanted one was encouraged to get a test done. The 'positivity' rate, ie those test that came back positive, were around 1.4%.

This number was to low to instil fear in the masses and wasn't even mentioned for months in the daily Covid updates. But people, like myself started to catch on by looking at the raw data from Health Ontario.

So they stopped testing everyone and limited it to testing only people with symptoms. Naturally the amount of test conducted dropped to about 6,000 a day. AND not surprisingly, the positivity rate jumped to 5% -6% . The media jumped on that number and politicians where happy to use it to implemented further restrictions...crippling the economy further.

[fishfood]

They could test more and more random. That would bring the numbers down per test. Also catch more cases .

As for testing more I mean what they are supposed to be testing per day that they are not. When you are still only testing 60 percent of your target you need to step up your game.

The random I mean they say up to 40 percent could be non symptomatic or show little to no symptoms yet these people will not be tested and spreading the virus.

They are only looking for 60 % of the virus leaving 40 to run out of control will they can't even reach their testing goals. Again they never really work on the whole problem. Just bits and pieces.






Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

[canadaman30]

Actually airports are open ... I personally know people who are flying.

I was being sarcastic...lol

[line052]

Testing = Cases
Cases do not mean hospitalization or medical intervention
Stop the fear narrative

[rick_iles]

A good read... https://summit.news/2020/11/18/top-p...ecting-public/

[Gilroy]

A good read... https://summit.news/2020/11/18/top-p...ecting-public/

Well Rick I did a quick check on the net,took about 2 minutes,I think Dr Hodskinson might have a little "conflict of interest".
In your link he is working for a company making testing kits for Covid and in only the second link to him I found that:

For an initial $350, Malpractice Check will assign a doctor to interview the client and give a preliminary opinion about whether malpractice occurred. If the answer is yes, customers can pay another $700 and receive a more detailed analysis of medical documents.

The alternatives are hiring a lawyer – which could be expensive depending on how they’re paid – or complaining to one of the provincial colleges of physicians and surgeons, agencies that are ill-equipped to investigate alleged medical error, said Hodkinson.https://nationalpost.com/health/new-...table-mistakes

Also when contacted by the newspaper below we have the following:

The Western Standard tried to contact Hodkinson through his office, but when informed what the topic involved, a secretary said he was too busy all week.
A message has been left on his cell phone.
Alberta has had close to 41,000 cases of COVID-19 resulting in 427 deaths.
Dave Naylor is the News Editor of the Western Standard