Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: Closer to home....

  1. #21
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noseyarentcha View Post
    I see your points Gilroy.
    The dog owner, if he did it, is a 4 square moron....first shoots dog, leaves gps collar on dog, digs up dog he buried AND calls police who will investigate.
    Hope if it is the owner that he gets the book thrown at him harder than if the dog killer is a stranger. To me, it seems somehow more sad if it is that dogs owner. That dog trusted his master!
    Poor dog
    Well the owner did not dig up the dog , the news paper report indicated the owners "friends" located the dog buried in the bush.After the dog was located by the friends the owner then called the police.If it was my dog and I was the owner I would be out tracking it but their could be a logical reason he was not,might have had to return to work or otherwise be out of camp which I assume he was.

    All I,am saying is that there is as much likely hood an irate owner of a dog shooting it in the head as some random hunter/anti hunter
    shooting it in the head. If it was either of the other two I suggest they were also morons for leaving the GPS on the body of the dog.
    That should probably had been ditched in the first pond or lake.

    They probably will not go into a ballistic test and all that,but the shooting is pretty sad.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #22
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    Considering the number of women subject to domestic violence each year your remark is poorly received.
    You did not think very much about what I said did you. MOST abused women will say that they tripped and hurt them self, not say their husband/boyfriend hurt them. So much for saying you had instincts to wonder about the story behind the Story.
    Last edited by Snowwalker; November 26th, 2016 at 05:41 PM.
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

  4. #23
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowwalker View Post
    You did not think very much about what I said did you. MOST abused women will say that they tripped and hurt them self, not say their husband/boyfriend hurt them. So much for saying you had instincts to wonder about the story behind the Story.

    You may even be the cop that came banging on my door one day to ask questions about an exgirlfriend that was beat up. Even though I lived over three thousand Kilometres away he grilled me for two hours about it, because when she was awake, she would break down and cry saying my name and that she was sorry. Don't tell me about Abuse from your F'ing high horse, I have seen more then enough to last me several life times.
    The entire tone of your posts conveys enough about where your coming from and the fact you can turn a post about a shot dog into an issue about your past domestic problems. The readers on here have you figured out already,maybe best to just delete your ravings.

  5. #24
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    The entire tone of your posts conveys enough about where your coming from and the fact you can turn a post about a shot dog into an issue about your past domestic problems. The readers on here have you figured out already,maybe best to just delete your ravings.
    Here read the important part about what I was saying..

    "You did not think very much about what I said did you. So much for saying you had instincts to wonder about the story behind the Story."
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

  6. #25
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    [COLOR=#333333]" So much for saying you had instincts to wonder about the story behind the Story."

    Are these your words because they are not mine? I have my opinion about the story and gave it.You on the other hand decided to give an opinion about me.

  7. #26
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    [COLOR=#333333]" So much for saying you had instincts to wonder about the story behind the Story."

    Are these your words because they are not mine? I have my opinion about the story and gave it.You on the other hand decided to give an opinion about me.

    An opinion that you have a habit of looking beyond what was said, and noticing things that where NOT said... holes in the story's logic. Your doing the math and when 2 + 2 =3 you call BS. Or has your trained and experienced investigative mind slipped away.
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

  8. #27
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noseyarentcha View Post
    Whoa. I, for one, did not think that anyone was turning a post about a shot dog into something about their past domestic problems. I thought he was trying to point out that just because the husband/boyfriend might be the first suspect that there were also other possibilties. When he posted about the hurt lady, the laundry and the stairs, MY first thought was that she tripped and fell down the stairs.
    OR....was pushed ! Appearances are very often deceiving! An investigator would not take them at face value.
    Last edited by rick_iles; November 26th, 2016 at 07:19 PM.

  9. #28
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    An investigator would not take them at face value.
    The traits that I was crediting Gilroy with.
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

  10. #29
    Just starting out

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharon View Post
    So they shot the dog by accident and buried the evidence.

    If they only knew how much heartache a missing dog brings to an owner.

    I had a dog stolen . He would be 18 now so long dead but still .....
    I am a member of this group and yes you can hunt in certain parts of the park under a special permit and a regulated hunting camp licence . The dog was a small beagle with a blaze orange radio collar, no mistaking it for anything else. The "friends" who found the dog only did so because it was still wearing the radio collar otherwise it wouldn't have been found. They were out tracking the radio signal with the intention of retrieving a live dog at the time.

  11. #30
    Just starting out

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    If it was my dog and I was the owner I would be out tracking it but their could be a logical reason he was not,might have had to return to work or otherwise be out of camp which I assume he was.

    All I,am saying is that there is as much likely hood an irate owner of a dog shooting it in the head as some random hunter/anti hunter
    shooting it in the head. If it was either of the other two I suggest they were also morons for leaving the GPS on the body of the dog.
    That should probably had been ditched in the first pond or lake. They probably will not go into a ballistic test and all that,but the shooting is pretty sad.


    You are mistaken. We were all in the camp at the time, including the dog owner when two members went out to track the missing dog. Normally the owner and another member go out if a dog is not retrieved immediately. That day another member volunteered to search for the dog while the owner stayed in camp. Also, the media and or police got the type of collar wrong as we use only radiotelemetry Dog tracking collars, and not GPS.
    Last edited by OneBarfly; November 28th, 2016 at 01:33 PM.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •