-
December 10th, 2016, 04:03 PM
#11
then again it could be the guy in 92b whos using a shotgun right now during the mz only hunt...just heard 4 bangs in a row...or maybe this guy is really fast reloading his mz lol
Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
-
December 10th, 2016 04:03 PM
# ADS
-
December 10th, 2016, 04:12 PM
#12
ohh wait another 8 in a row lol this guy is on a roll must be a terrible shot
Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
-
December 10th, 2016, 04:22 PM
#13
Personally I think it was a hit ....and they used an assassin with a pimped out Savage 10ml capable of sniper shots out past 300 + yds to try take him out. The 'slug' evidence will lead to OPP to believe it was only a local Shotgun hunter.
The perfect crime except he missed..darn those long shots ....LOL...
-
December 10th, 2016, 04:35 PM
#14
My main suspect is a deer doin' a drive by shooting.
My attitude towards you depends upon how you have treated me.
-
December 10th, 2016, 04:46 PM
#15
Question is since this wasn't a mortal wound ethically who gets to claim the vehicle?
Time in the outdoors is never wasted
-
December 10th, 2016, 07:30 PM
#16
Suppose it could be a 12 ga. sabot round. They are .50 cal.
-
December 11th, 2016, 01:17 PM
#17
Has too much time on their hands
Most Sabots are 45 cal in a plastic sleeve. Sabot
-
December 12th, 2016, 09:35 AM
#18
Has too much time on their hands
Originally Posted by
Noseyarentcha
Where is the proof that this incident actually occured where and when the driver said it did?
"The motorist whose car was struck, travelling alone, drove on to his work in Woodstock before contacting police, Culbert said."
...automatically pointing the finger at a hunter is crap.
Coulda been a ticked off ex, neighbor, gang banger on the loose, etc.
Prove where it happened and that it was a hunter before placing blame.
Ohh...a car has a bullet hole in it.
It was a hunter!
Complete BS until proven.
Creates nothing but more fuel for the anti gunners and anti hunters.
What so difficult to believe in this story? Hunting accident happens. Do you think all hunters look what's behind the deer before pulling the trigger?
Conspiracy theory BS.....
Last edited by seabast; December 12th, 2016 at 10:38 AM.
-
December 12th, 2016, 09:48 AM
#19
Originally Posted by
finsfurfeathers
Question is since this wasn't a mortal wound ethically who gets to claim the vehicle?
Depends - is he parked on private property?
-
December 12th, 2016, 10:10 AM
#20
Originally Posted by
mooboy76
Depends - is he parked on private property?
Only if he has permission otherwise need to call the MNR for access
Time in the outdoors is never wasted
