-
June 16th, 2017, 07:45 AM
#31
Has too much time on their hands
Mark Snow, Leader Of The, Ontario Libertarian Party
-
June 16th, 2017 07:45 AM
# ADS
-
June 16th, 2017, 08:29 AM
#32

Originally Posted by
Bushmoose
I'm not sure why anyone would argue about the past registry info? If it does exist, it's all outdated and worthless info now. Personally, I don't care if the old info is out there, it's all a moot point now.
I agree,absolutely,besides the fact that mere possession of the registry data outside the court order by anyone would be illegal and could be charged with contempt of court,just for starters. I also don't believe that The Liberal Party of Canada is interested in setting themselves up for another stunning defeat over the issue in the next election,especially,in light of the current total meltdown of the Ontario Liberals poised to be permanently banished to the political garbage heap of history and the unmitigated disaster the Trudeau government is turning into. Another gun control final nail-in-the-coffin isn't the most intelligent move,politically.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
June 16th, 2017, 11:05 AM
#33
Has too much time on their hands
Privacy law will be hard to get around for Quebec trying to get info passed over to them. The easier way of gun control is to unleash the RCMP to change the class of many guns, therefor getting rid of more scary looking guns....
-
June 16th, 2017, 01:04 PM
#34

Originally Posted by
canadaman30
Privacy law will be hard to get around for Quebec trying to get info passed over to them. The easier way of gun control is to unleash the RCMP to change the class of many guns, therefor getting rid of more scary looking guns....
I think there's enough political heat coming down on them to give them pause before they blindly follow their Liberal masters over the abyss.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
June 16th, 2017, 04:44 PM
#35
It gives the Government and Police a starting point. Many out there if they were to receive a call from the Police to confirm if they own a specific gun or not. Old data can still be useful.

Originally Posted by
Bushmoose
I'm not sure why anyone would argue about the past registry info? If it does exist, it's all outdated and worthless info now. Personally, I don't care if the old info is out there, it's all a moot point now.
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
June 16th, 2017, 06:08 PM
#36

Originally Posted by
greatwhite
It gives the Government and Police a starting point. Many out there if they were to receive a call from the Police to confirm if they own a specific gun or not. Old data can still be useful.
If I were to receive a call from someone asking about firearms, I'd just hang up on them. Let's be real here? Law enforcement agencies are not about to start calling, visiting or attending hundreds of thousands of homes to verify whether or not people still own firearms listed on a defunct registry.
-
June 16th, 2017, 06:19 PM
#37
Than again hundreds of thousands voluntarily registered them didn't they.
Many of them would do it again even if they don't like it.

Originally Posted by
Bushmoose
If I were to receive a call from someone asking about firearms, I'd just hang up on them. Let's be real here? Law enforcement agencies are not about to start calling, visiting or attending hundreds of thousands of homes to verify whether or not people still own firearms listed on a defunct registry.
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
June 16th, 2017, 06:36 PM
#38

Originally Posted by
greatwhite
Than again hundreds of thousands voluntarily registered them didn't they.
Many of them would do it again even if they don't like it.
I would hardly call the registry "voluntary" !!!!
-
June 17th, 2017, 12:06 AM
#39
Has too much time on their hands
Brian Lilley reports the shocking news that despite repeated assurances that the gun registry data had been destroyed, copies remain and C-52 will hand over the data to Quebec.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmUYqqGRUpg
Showing videos of the RCMP and Blaney saying the data is destroyed.... once again theRebel covering what the media won't. RCMP and bureaucrats ignoring legal decisions .... why isn't it surprising anymore.
-
June 17th, 2017, 09:14 AM
#40
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
mosquito
Brian Lilley reports the shocking news that despite repeated assurances that the gun registry data had been destroyed, copies remain and C-52 will hand over the data to Quebec.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmUYqqGRUpg
Showing videos of the RCMP and Blaney saying the data is destroyed.... once again theRebel covering what the media won't. RCMP and bureaucrats ignoring legal decisions .... why isn't it surprising anymore.
I don't see what good outdated info will do whatsoever
Last edited by canadaman30; June 17th, 2017 at 09:18 AM.