-
February 21st, 2018, 07:07 PM
#71
Originally Posted by
Deer Hunter
Very good discussion. Sorry to butt in. Just a quick comment. I never could understand why someone would put themselves in such a bad situation. I have several restricted firearms, if I thought my family’s well-being was at risk, the last thing I would grab is a restricted firearm! Why bother! You will always end up in a lengthy legal battle. Personally, the first thing I would grab is my trusty old shotgun loaded with buckshot. Just my two cents.
X2. Multiple targets with one or two shots sure works for me.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
February 21st, 2018 07:07 PM
# ADS
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:20 PM
#72
Originally Posted by
trimmer21
X2. Multiple targets with one or two shots sure works for me.
It makes no difference what class of firearm you grab, you had better be damned sure your ducks were in a row........remember....”I feared for my life.”
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:26 PM
#73
What I find interesting is that Stanley made no self-defence arguments, instead claiming that the shooting was entirely accidental -- yet his supporters universally justify the shooting as self defence.
Seems to me the subtext is, nobody believes it was an accident.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:32 PM
#74
Originally Posted by
welsh
What I find interesting is that Stanley made no self-defence arguments, instead claiming that the shooting was entirely accidental -- yet his supporters universally justify the shooting as self defence.
Seems to me the subtext is, nobody believes it was an accident.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
From everything I have read, a self defence defence would have likely failed .
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:33 PM
#75
Originally Posted by
rick_iles
No, like I said earlier, that Regulation is for formal ranges, like a gun club etc., where shooting is ongoing.
Was commenting on Gilroy's post with "Section 29".
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:38 PM
#76
Originally Posted by
Gilroy
We are talking about restricted firearms in this debate,please stay awake.
The section "Makes no distinction between Non-restricted, Restricted....."
Maybe you need to read what you post.
Read the complete section you posted.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:38 PM
#77
Originally Posted by
welsh
Seems to me the subtext is, nobody believes it was an accident.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
I suppose it is possible 
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:39 PM
#78
Originally Posted by
Snowwalker
Was commenting on Gilroy's post with "Section 29".
Ah.....
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:40 PM
#79
Originally Posted by
trimmer21
X2. Multiple targets with one or two shots sure works for me.
I can still find the loading recipe for 12 gauge rock salt in the back of one of my manuals...
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
February 21st, 2018, 07:43 PM
#80
Originally Posted by
rick_iles
Ah.....
No problem..beers and cheers.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
