-
March 3rd, 2018, 06:28 PM
#61
Has too much time on their hands
I bet not many gang bangers turned in there guns. Drug dealers ether.
-
March 3rd, 2018 06:28 PM
# ADS
-
March 3rd, 2018, 08:23 PM
#62

Originally Posted by
Gilroy
They banned guns in Australia to an extent and seem to have solved their mass shooting problems.It can be done.Have you heard about mass shootings in Scotland since Dunblaine?
That dog won't hunt no more,Gilroy. There were no "mass shootings" before the one that precipitated all the draconian gun confiscation and subsequent firearms bans making it a "one of" occurrence that gun control advocates seized on to as an excuse. Stating that all the "new" gun control measures resulted in no more mass shootings is just liberal leftist BS spin with absolutely no basis in fact. As for the Dunblaine incident,it was another "one of" incident. Just because another hasn't happened has ZERO to do with the Scots ill-advised and useless gun control measures,either. To think otherwise is simply delusional.
Last edited by trimmer21; March 3rd, 2018 at 08:26 PM.
Reason: sp
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
March 4th, 2018, 06:47 PM
#63

Originally Posted by
Dythbringer
And what about all the other adult shooters who have never killed people. Why do they never factor into your thinking? You know the massive majority of people who own firearms. The way you always talk, you expect us to off the rails at any time. In fact, since you think firearm owners are untrustworthy, I expect you to go down to your local police station and hand in your firearms for destruction because we can't trust you not to go off the rails.
Bump stock is an after market addition. Using something like that to make a semi-automatic into an automatic is akin to sawing off a shotgun. Legal firearm owners who follow the law wouldn't be doing that.
Sigh. Australia again huh? Still beating that drum. So the Australian public just turned in 57 000 firearms under an amnesty program. Alot of them were pistol grip. Since your premise has always been the banning of those firearms has solved their mass shooting problems, why weren't there any mass shootings with those firearms during the period between 1996 and the amnesty program?
No point in getting yur nickers in a twist.Your the one who brought up all about licensed and trained gun owners.They still go off the rails.At least you now admit an AR 15 can be made into a fully auto.
-
March 4th, 2018, 06:48 PM
#64

Originally Posted by
jaycee
Hey Dyth!
Gilroy-??? just likes to hear himself talk, or see himself in print.
" Has A Narcissist Bent To Be Heard In The Cacophony Of The Media "-- author unknown.
More one liners by the angry little old troll.
-
March 4th, 2018, 06:51 PM
#65

Originally Posted by
trimmer21
That dog won't hunt no more,Gilroy. There were no "mass shootings" before the one that precipitated all the draconian gun confiscation and subsequent firearms bans making it a "one of" occurrence that gun control advocates seized on to as an excuse. Stating that all the "new" gun control measures resulted in no more mass shootings is just liberal leftist BS spin with absolutely no basis in fact. As for the Dunblaine incident,it was another "one of" incident. Just because another hasn't happened has ZERO to do with the Scots ill-advised and useless gun control measures,either. To think otherwise is simply delusional.
Well that,s nailed it right there.Liberals add up all the so called "one off,s" and come to an honest total. Conservatives keep calling them "one off,s" and continue to stick their collective heads in the sand.That is why America is in such as state and why we are not going there.
-
March 4th, 2018, 06:55 PM
#66
In fact, there were something like 14 mass shootings leading up to the Australian ban.
And before Dunblane, there was Hungerford.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
March 4th, 2018, 07:25 PM
#67

Originally Posted by
Gilroy
More one liners by the angry little old troll.
Gilroy, we all see you as one/both of these, you have proven it over and over.
The Persistent Debate Troll
This type of troll loves a good argument. They can take a great, thoroughly researched and fact-based piece of content, and come at it from all opposing discussion angles to challenge its message. They believe they're right, and everyone else is wrong. You'll often also find them leaving long threads or arguments with other commenters in community comment sections, and they're always determined to have the last word – continuing to comment until that other user gives up.
10
The Show-Off, Know-it-All Or Blabbermouth Troll
A close relative to the persistent debate troll, the show-off or blabbermouth troll is a person who doesn't necessarily like to participate in arguments but does love to share his opinion in extreme detail, even spreading rumors and secrets in some cases. Think of that one family member or friend you know who just loves to hear his own voice. That's the Internet equivalent of the show-off or know-it-all or blabbermouth troll. They love to have long discussions and write lots of paragraphs about whatever they know, whether anyone reads it or not.
Take your pills , and go to bed before they come looking for you again.
Last edited by jaycee; March 4th, 2018 at 07:28 PM.
-
March 4th, 2018, 07:43 PM
#68
Yet another thread gone on too long and reduced to bickering.