-
March 5th, 2019, 12:17 PM
#31
People trespass= believable
People shoot other peoples pets= believable
People shoot from the road= believable
People dragging a dead collared dog across a field= unbelievable
JMO
-
March 5th, 2019 12:17 PM
# ADS
-
March 5th, 2019, 12:29 PM
#32
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
March 5th, 2019, 12:31 PM
#33

Originally Posted by
onelessarrow
People trespass= believable
People shoot other peoples pets= believable
People shoot from the road= believable
People dragging a dead collared dog across a field= unbelievable
JMO
Hiding evidence?
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
March 5th, 2019, 01:52 PM
#34

Originally Posted by
Snowwalker
Hiding evidence?
Bingo !!
-
March 5th, 2019, 01:53 PM
#35

Originally Posted by
Snowwalker
No he is just speculating on other reasons the dog could have been shot.
Maybe the shooter had been confronted by owner for trespassing and saw a quick revenge.
Now it says in the post the owner heard the shots, but did they hear any calls( rabbit in distress for example).
I am sure the investigator is running every possible reason through his/her mind. How every strange they will be eliminated.
Alien attack? No.

Animal sacrifice? No.

Etc.
Not many guys call around here. We push bushes and walk ditch banks....
-
March 5th, 2019, 01:56 PM
#36

Originally Posted by
Snowwalker
Hiding evidence?
If that we're the case, they are far dumber than originally thought. It's not like Police of MNRF would allocate any funds to conduct an investigation, beyond "gee....guess you'll want to bury that".
Sucks nonetheless, but can't see removing the dog for any sane reason, other than to purposefully inflict emotional harm.
"Camo" is perfectly acceptable as a favorite colour.
Proud member - Delta Waterfowl, CSSA, and OFAH
-
March 5th, 2019, 03:51 PM
#37

Originally Posted by
Bluebulldog
If that we're the case, they are far dumber than originally thought. It's not like Police of MNRF would allocate any funds to conduct an investigation, beyond "gee....guess you'll want to bury that".
Sucks nonetheless, but can't see removing the dog for any sane reason, other than to purposefully inflict emotional harm.
X2 can't punch owner......shoot dog.
Very cowardly nut possible.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
March 5th, 2019, 03:55 PM
#38

Originally Posted by
rick_iles
Not many guys call around here. We push bushes and walk ditch banks....
Good info. Thanks.. also means rabbit distress call is not something dog hears unless it's a real rabbit.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
March 5th, 2019, 04:58 PM
#39

Originally Posted by
Snowwalker
Hiding evidence?
I think that would be adding more evidence as opposed to hiding lol. But, like BBG implies, maybe they're just not bright
-
March 5th, 2019, 05:25 PM
#40

Originally Posted by
onelessarrow
I think that would be adding more evidence as opposed to hiding lol. But, like BBG implies, maybe they're just not bright
They shot a dog with a collar in the middle of an empty field, is broad day light. Sounds like genus material to me.
( Careful heavy sarcasm )
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.