Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 40

Thread: Toronto star article

  1. #11
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    If your going to complain or comment about a personal opinion columnist, at least get the day right. Mallick has no column in the Star today, (Sunday), it was in Saturdays Star.LOL.
    C’mon now. Is this all you have? You make it too easy. Up your game if you’re going to protect a bunch of lieing incompetents with no morals. Go ahead make some argument that supports what the PMO and Privy Council did. It’s your team right?
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #12
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by terrym View Post
    C’mon now. Is this all you have? You make it too easy. Up your game if you’re going to protect a bunch of lieing incompetents with no morals. Go ahead make some argument that supports what the PMO and Privy Council did. It’s your team right?
    LOL he really said that did he? I have him blocked so I don't see his inane chatter. But you're right, that is so lame if that's all he could muster up. Who cares what day it was anyway, what she wrote in that article is the subject of this thread. And he actually thought he was being witty, what a loser.

    Cheers

  4. #13
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Yes. He did.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  5. #14
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Michael Coren has a good column today, Monday, in the Star for those who receive it.

  6. #15
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    Michael Coren has a good column today, Monday, in the Star for those who receive it.
    I don’t get the Star any more.....my budgie died !!

  7. #16
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Make no mistake ... these articles are part of a bigger Liberal strategy. Have you not seen the numerous articles that have come out in the past week that basically are trying to say the SNC Scandal is no big deal? In fact last night, I read a new article that states this is nothing compared to the abuse of power by Trump's administration ... and sure, maybe it's not ... but it's still WRONG. What's next, hey compared to a serial killer, Trudope looks good? Yeah, sure.

    Many, many articles trying to make this a mickey mouse issue ... and it's coming from the Liberals ... these papers aren't independent anymore, they are told by the Liberals what to write.

  8. #17
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    They're right, its no big deal... just a major Canadian company giving huge amounts of money to the brutal dictator of a county whose residents were fleeing as refugees and being resettled in Canada at the expense of Canadian taxpayers.

    What if it wasn't Libya but was instead Syria? Hey JT, think about that for a moment...
    "What calm deer hunter's heart has not skipped a beat when the stillness of a cold November morning is broken by the echoes of hounds tonguing yonder?" -Anonymous-

  9. #18
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    What it is all about is share values of SNC first. The biggest shareholder is the Quebec public service union. I would also be curious to see how Morneau Shepell and Trudough’s trust fund is invested in SNC. Secondly SNC is a huge political contributor to the Liberals. They are fighting charges of illegal donations too. Even the CBC has said that the figure of 9000 employees isn’t believable.
    If SNC had to walk away from the projects they secured through political bribes the other reputable Engineering firms would step in to do the work. Unless.....the work wasn’t actually needed or even done at all. Anybody remember the money laundering of ADSCAM?
    Being barred from Federal projects doesn’t stop them from bidding on Provincial ones. They could live off the crooks who run Quebec and Quebecers would be good with that.
    When you start to erode the rule of law for political gain you are creating a Banana republic with snow.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  10. #19
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Well it is a Quebec company...
    https://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/...rupt-province/

    and as for the Toronto Star, I would really like to find out how they do the subscriptions ... I had a free subscription that they said was funded by a company for years, I got so sick of it I cancelled even that, I was called repeatedly about free and deal subscriptions for years... cancelling the Bell wired phone took care of that and most of the duct cleaning calls.

    The Libs don't seem to have an issue with the prostitution, bribes, coverups, intimidation, attempting to illegally influence criminal proceedings.. etc. at all do they.... I guess if Butts didn't like the influencing law (as per her testimony), I wonder what other laws he didn't like.... I also wonder if Butts was the one that coached Justin here ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iY3I2ewuxQ0

    Also... bribes to them isn't a problem since after all Justin admires dictators and tyrants (China and Cuba for example.)

    Justlied keeps talking about rebates on the carbon tax too ... but does that include the planned increases...
    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/cana...-rebate-model/
    Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has repeatedly touted the federal levy, starting at $20 per tonne and rising to $50 in 2022, as the centrepiece of efforts to fight climate change.
    Last edited by mosquito; March 11th, 2019 at 10:28 PM.

  11. #20
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    'DPA's were put into law to avoid harming parties that aren't directly responsible for wrongdoing. To prevent harm to innocent stakeholders, that could include employees and pensioners', says Richard Lablanc, law and ethics professor at York Uni..... Seems like it did what it was supposed to. Harper was in power when SNC broke all those laws , so maybe they knew that the Libs would form the next government and help them out. LOL
    Last edited by fishermccann; March 12th, 2019 at 08:16 AM.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •