-
May 10th, 2019, 11:49 AM
#151
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
jaycee
Re the Liberals,
Interesting article in yesterday's paper, "Gov't. covering it's tracks " by Warren Kinsella , at the end of his article, he states
"We can be left with only one conclusion,
This is the most corrupt government in Canada's history . And they must --be defeated."
If Kinsella is publicly stating this, what is he saying privately?
-
May 10th, 2019 11:49 AM
# ADS
-
May 10th, 2019, 12:27 PM
#152

Originally Posted by
MikePal
And as history has proven..to stop a revolution, you only need one bullet.
That is true, but a lot of voters, means lots of bullets. Do you want to live in a place where dissension means death?
-
May 10th, 2019, 12:30 PM
#153
Anyone who thinks one bullet will stop a revolution has never studied the history of revolution.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
May 10th, 2019, 01:21 PM
#154
Calibre magazine is reporting there may be an OIC pending regarding the AR-15.
https://calibremag.ca/ar-15-likely-t...f-planned-oic/
Still anonymously sourced but more plausible than a blanket ban.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
May 10th, 2019, 01:33 PM
#155

Originally Posted by
fishermccann
Do you want to live in a place where dissension means death?
Well if you're in the Liberal Cabinet and dare voice dissension, it's means the death of your career
-
May 10th, 2019, 01:35 PM
#156
Every party removes members who do not toe the party line. P.C. cabinet minister Randy Hillier comes to mind. LOL. Except the now barred Senator Lynn Beyak, unless her opinion, is the cons. party line.
Last edited by fishermccann; May 10th, 2019 at 01:48 PM.
-
May 10th, 2019, 01:39 PM
#157
Sounds like Mr. Clement's sources were right....a secret plan was afoot..
After some consultation with experts, it is our expectation that such a news item would more likely take the form of an Order in Council-imposed ban on the transfer of any AR-15, similar to the action taken in New Zealand. Such an OIC may also migrate the AR-15 to prohibited status as well, with sources indicating that no confiscation is yet planned. Thus,
it seems most likely that any action taken by the planned Order in Council will likely be followed by a Liberal Party campaign promise of legislative action to remove AR-15s and possibly other forms of firearms from civilian possession.
I wonder if Tony has a buddy in Que:
a senior official in the government of Quebec has confirmed that they were told to expect a large news item pertaining to the AR-15.
Last edited by MikePal; May 10th, 2019 at 01:45 PM.
-
May 10th, 2019, 01:48 PM
#158
You're welcome.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
May 10th, 2019, 01:57 PM
#159

Originally Posted by
welsh
The Liberals subsequently denied it, saying "no decision has been taken."
"a senior official in the government of Quebec has confirmed that they were told to expect a large news item pertaining to the AR-15."

Originally Posted by
welsh
You're welcome.
No problem, it's easy to find proof that the Liberals lie...just don't understand why you consistently believe them .
-
May 10th, 2019, 01:59 PM
#160
All parties lie. "not one teacher will lose their job". D. Ford.