-
May 24th, 2019, 04:09 PM
#31

Originally Posted by
Bushmoose
Ya, the mentor angle seems like a stretch? I don't doubt they have cruised this site and probably do on a casual basis, but if I had to put money on it, they would be more apt to react to a member on here reporting something?
Yea a LEO misrepresenting him/her/person self to entrap someone wouldn't go over well with a judge. Silly for them to even attempt anything like that.
Your right BM, right from the horses mouth...the CO's have become complaint driven. They will respond and take a boo if someone calls them.
Last edited by MikePal; May 24th, 2019 at 04:11 PM.
-
May 24th, 2019 04:09 PM
# ADS
-
May 24th, 2019, 05:17 PM
#32
COs here or on FB would be more likely to just read & take notes than to go to the trouble of impersonating a newbie, I would think.
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
"The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
-- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)
-
May 25th, 2019, 10:09 AM
#33
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
alfoldivandor
You got it ...
Co's are using the technology to....
It is easier than the foot on the ground ...
They've been "using the technology" for years. No doubt they check this site occasionally for bragging lawbreakers, or dumb ones.
I've sent PM's to a couple people who posted ads on this site to re-sell additional doe tags or to sell last year's venison.
-
May 25th, 2019, 10:43 AM
#34

Originally Posted by
MikePal
Yea a LEO misrepresenting him/her/person self to entrap someone wouldn't go over well with a judge.Silly for them to even attempt anything like that.
Your right BM, right from the horses mouth...the CO's have become complaint driven. They will respond and take a boo if someone calls them.
How would that be any different from , when a cop/leo uses the internet and poses as a young girl to entrap child molesters.
The cops do this all the time and that's how these perverts get caught, thankfully.
Last edited by jaycee; May 25th, 2019 at 10:51 AM.
-
May 25th, 2019, 03:02 PM
#35
Up at the hunt camp we communicate via two way radio. One of the guys mentioned that he had passed a ministry truck on the way down to his watch. One of the other guys asked if he had the dyke with him, an OPP officer. The next thing we heard " I'm not a dyke" They do monitor 2 way radios...
SkyBlue Big Game Blueticks
-
May 25th, 2019, 03:37 PM
#36

Originally Posted by
Bo D
Up at the hunt camp we communicate via two way radio. One of the guys mentioned that he had passed a ministry truck on the way down to his watch. One of the other guys asked if he had the dyke with him, an OPP officer. The next thing we heard " I'm not a dyke" They do monitor 2 way radios...
Moose hunters are always surprised when CO's just happen to be around after they shoot one...duh...
Last edited by MikePal; May 25th, 2019 at 03:43 PM.
-
May 25th, 2019, 03:55 PM
#37

Originally Posted by
MikePal
Yea a LEO misrepresenting him/her/person self to entrap someone wouldn't go over well with a judge. Silly for them to even attempt anything like that.
Your right BM, right from the horses mouth...the CO's have become complaint driven. They will respond and take a boo if someone calls them.
LEO "misrepresent" themselves all the time, it is called "undercover" work. No entrapment .
Still quite a long shot trying to get your hooks into someone that way.... unless..mmmmmm... maybe they are targeting a certain individual, say like on this forum maybe ???
Interesting...........
Last edited by smokin'stoegie; May 25th, 2019 at 04:01 PM.
-
May 25th, 2019, 04:05 PM
#38

Originally Posted by
smokin'stoegie
LEO "misrepresent" themselves all the time, it is called "undercover" work. No entrapment .
It's not as easy as that....and why we have judges.
The law of entrapment in Canada is intended to prevent the police from attracting someone who is not already involved in criminal activity into committing a crime by offering an opportunity to commit a criminal act. This is known as random virtue-testing. When determining whether the police engaged in random virtue-testing, the police conduct must be assessed for its reasonableness.
Reasonable suspicion is a low standard to meet and requires proof that the individual targeted is possibly engaged in criminal activity. It is something more than a mere suspicion and something less than a belief based on reasonable and probably grounds. The facts must support the suspicion and allow for an independent judicial assessment. It is important to consider the totality of circumstances when assessing the existence of reasonable suspicion. The inquiry must consider the constellation of objectively discernable facts that are said to give the investigating officer reasonable cause to suspect that an individual is involved in the type of criminal activity under investigation. This inquiry must be fact-based, flexible, and grounded in common sense and practical, everyday experience. A police officer’s grounds for reasonable suspicion can’t be assessed in isolation.
The court has the power to stay proceedings if entrapment is established.*
-
May 25th, 2019, 04:41 PM
#39

Originally Posted by
Snowwalker
They forced the Jews to wear yellow stars, and the LBGT people to wear Purple triangles. What will they make us wear? .
That's easy Hunter orange however camo by choice most of the time.
Last edited by finsfurfeathers; May 25th, 2019 at 04:58 PM.
Time in the outdoors is never wasted
-
May 25th, 2019, 05:31 PM
#40

Originally Posted by
MikePal
Moose hunters are always surprised when CO's just happen to be around after they shoot one...duh...

Like wolves. I am not worried about Wolves or COs. Not doing anything wrong, and I have a couple seals.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.