Page 7 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 107

Thread: Misdialed 911 call leads RCMP to home with 100 unsecured guns

  1. #61
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    Most people want them to thoroughly investigate all 911 calls, "sorry it was a miss-dial" does not cover it..... Many here say they want people punished for their gun crimes to the fullest extent of the law, but why in this case are people looking for loopholes to get him off? Could it be that he is not a black kid in the city?
    Ya but most of these “most people” are liberals and live in Toronto and they also can’t figure out how to get a trigger lock off within a few minutes.............
    I love fishing but REALLY it is just a way to pass time until hunting season!!!!

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #62
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by duckslayer View Post
    Ya but most of these “most people” are liberals and live in Toronto and they also can’t figure out how to get a trigger lock off within a few minutes.............
    ..... and they just cant help themselves to racebait every opportunity they can. Pretty disgusting considering the Eatons Center Mall shooting court decision this week, lowering the charge from murder to manslaughter. Pathetic.
    I take no lesson from them clowns.

  4. #63
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I've done something similar except it was 611 I was attempting to dial. Two OPP officers showed up about ten minutes later at the front gate. I explained the situation and offered to let them search the house (they didn't ask.) They declined. It wouldn't have been a problem as my guns are legally stored.

  5. #64
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    . The fact that buddy allowed police entry, eliminates that argument.
    Even a lawyer who graduated bottom 3rd of his class could win a case of diminished responsibility (capacity)....becasue it's clear that anyone who has 100 guns laying round the house and allows a LEO to come in and have a look around should not be held fully criminally liable for doing so, as their mental functions were clearly "diminished" or impaired.

  6. #65
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    Even a lawyer who graduated bottom 3rd of his class could win a case of diminished responsibility (capacity)....becasue it's clear that anyone who has 100 guns laying round the house and allows a LEO to come in and have a look around should not be held fully criminally liable for doing so, as their mental functions were clearly "diminished" or impaired.
    Given that rationale, anyone committing a criminal offence could say the same !!
    Ya can’t fix stupid !!

  7. #66
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    Come on , are you are going to take dozens of guns out of safe storage at the same time to clean or admire them, in rooms all over the house? If you are going to do that do not call 911. I bet he did not have enough locks or locked storage for all his guns. Sounds like you are trying to justify, or excuse his unsafe storage. Why?
    Because he's not committing any crime by being at home with his guns out of a safe or the trigger lock taken off, regardless if it's 1 or 100. They're charging him on the assumption he leaves them that way all the time.

    Should you be charged on the assumption that you'll speed on the way to your cottage?

    Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
    "where a man feels at home, outside of where he's born, is where he's meant to go"
    ​- Ernest Hemingway

  8. #67
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GW11 View Post
    Because he's not committing any crime by being at home with his guns out of a safe or the trigger lock taken off, regardless if it's 1 or 100. They're charging him on the assumption he leaves them that way all the time.

    Should you be charged on the assumption that you'll speed on the way to your cottage?

    Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk
    Well, that would depend on where they were found, or if he even had locks. Lots of information not known here.,,

  9. #68
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    Given that rationale, anyone committing a criminal offence could say the same !!
    Much easier to convince a judge when your client is a 73 yrs old and happens to fail the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Test and is declared to have dementia

  10. #69
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MikePal View Post
    Much easier to convince a judge when your client is a 73 yrs old and happens to fail the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Test and is declared to have dementia
    If that were the case, the court could order a prohibition and if his lawyer requests, an order of disposition for the guns.

  11. #70
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    If that were the case, the court could order a prohibition and if his lawyer requests, an order of disposition for the guns.
    Bingo...gets his client off the hook for the more serious fines and the general public is no longer at risk...everyone wins.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •