-
August 30th, 2019, 11:06 AM
#21

Originally Posted by
Bear13
303 british.....pretty slow heavy roud.....it wont go far
No not very far...ONLY two or three Miles. It will carry enough energy to do serious injury or death for a long time.
It is normal for hunters up north to drop moose at 500 to 800 yards with the 303 British using 180 or 200 grain rounds.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
August 30th, 2019 11:06 AM
# ADS
-
August 30th, 2019, 11:19 AM
#22

Originally Posted by
Snowwalker
No not very far...ONLY two or three Miles. It will carry enough energy to do serious injury or death for a long time.
It is normal for hunters up north to drop moose at 500 to 800 yards with the 303 British using 180 or 200 grain rounds.
I am pretty sure he meant the bear will not go far
-
August 30th, 2019, 03:08 PM
#23
Maybe the bullet will stay in the bear.
-
August 30th, 2019, 03:24 PM
#24

Originally Posted by
glen
Maybe the bullet will stay in the bear.
In the shattered shoulder behind the exploded heart would be a great spot for it.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
August 30th, 2019, 08:41 PM
#25
i sported a 6.5x55. was a good all around choice when bushwacking northern ontario.
-
August 31st, 2019, 07:01 AM
#26

Originally Posted by
Bear13
303 british.....pretty slow heavy roud.....it wont go far

Originally Posted by
Snowwalker
No not very far...ONLY two or three Miles. It will carry enough energy to do serious injury or death for a long time.
It is normal for hunters up north to drop moose at 500 to 800 yards with the 303 British using 180 or 200 grain rounds.
You do know that a 180gr .303 zeroed at 200 yds will have a -60" (5 FEET ) hold over for it to hit a target at 500 yd and will have less than 1,000 ft/lbs of energy (ethical minimum to kill a deer).
So you might not be stretching it to say hunters are killing deer with it at 800 yds HaHa...
-
August 31st, 2019, 07:15 AM
#27

Originally Posted by
punkrockerpj
i sported a 6.5x55. was a good all around choice when bushwacking northern ontario.
Millions of Europeans agree !!
-
August 31st, 2019, 08:03 AM
#28
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
MikePal
You do know that a 180gr .303 zeroed at 200 yds will have a -60" (5 FEET ) hold over for it to hit a target at 500 yd and will have less than 1,000 ft/lbs of energy (ethical minimum to kill a deer).
So you might not be stretching it to say hunters are killing deer with it at 800 yds HaHa...
Those kind of shots are what the 7mm, 300 magnums are better suited for....
-
August 31st, 2019, 03:40 PM
#29

Originally Posted by
canadaman30
Those kind of shots are what the 7mm, 300 magnums are better suited for....
Only wealthy southern hunters had those. I was 21 years old before I found out there was someone beside Dominion Arms that made rifle ammo. That was the year I finally ran out of the ammo I got for my Birthdays and in my Xmas stocking since I was 9 years old.
I miss my No 4 rifle.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.
-
August 31st, 2019, 03:46 PM
#30

Originally Posted by
MikePal
You do know that a 180gr .303 zeroed at 200 yds will have a -60" (5 FEET ) hold over for it to hit a target at 500 yd and will have less than 1,000 ft/lbs of energy (ethical minimum to kill a deer).
It is still a dangerous round for a long distance beyond your target. Just because it's not a 3000+ FPS round does not mean it's not going travel aways.
My No.4 Rifle had an adjustable sight and I used an Optical range finder.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.