The same gov't body that just before the registry disappeared, or atleast it was supposed to... there was that little deal with some .22 rifles suddenly....
By the way what has been inaccurate, there are mixed messages about where and how the bore size is measured, lawyers that specialize in firearms say since it isn't a permanent part of the barrel the choke tube isn't a part and that's where they measured, making the muzzle .814 for a Winchoke barrel. Hence illegal and as this goes on the original screwed up legislation keeps getting more firearms added.
Like this post from the "Sales and Marketing Director at Cadex Defence", their company that just had two more of it's rifles added to the list.
" May 1st was our CDX-50 Tremor 50BMG
48 hours ago was our CDX-40 Shadow 408CT
and today was our CDX-40 Shadow 375CT"
A bolt action precision rifle in 375 CT
https://www.cadexdefence.com/product...cdx-40-shadow/
With ammo at $100 for 10.
https://deserttech.com/ammunition/375-ct.php
and the RCMP seems in contrast to...the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) Memorandum D19-13-2, issued May 29, 2019, defines BORE as:
"the inside of the barrel of a firearm, from the throat to the muzzle, through which the projectile travels. "
So the CBSA’s definition, it may be all 12-gauge and 10-gauge shotguns – not just those with removable chokes – are now Prohibited firearms because they do not consider the forcing cone, the “throat” of the barrel, which exceeds the 20 mm maximum bore diameter specified in SOR/2020-96.
Do you believe Bill and the RCMP.... that is the question, or do you keep their feet to the fire and make sure that there is a real legal definition like midpoint or x inches from the muzzle etc.? If they can keep adding firearms then they should be able to add a definition easy enough.
As for me, I like to see the evidence, the definition and it in writing.