I'll just leave this here.
https://rumble.com/vbq6jx-dr.-anthon...60LQYi1VxE32Cw
Yes
No
I'll just leave this here.
https://rumble.com/vbq6jx-dr.-anthon...60LQYi1VxE32Cw
Well.... that’s pretty disturbing !!Originally Posted by smitty55
“If you’re not a Liberal by twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a Conservative by forty, you have no brain.”
-Winston Churchill
yes it is....and the real reason the virus is still spreading when everyone is wearing masks in lockdown...
Well I think that explains why they're ignoring the death rate, it'll expose everything in that video as accurate, from supression of therapeutics to fudging the numbers.
Imagine trying to be a psychiatrist today?
Follow the money
https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-07-...a-vaccine.html
OFAH, CSSA, NFA
Well, that's not very reassuring. Thanks for sharing.
"In SARS, a type of “priming” of the immune system was observed during animal studies of SARS spike protein-based vaccines leading to increased morbidity and mortality in vaccinated animals who were subsequently exposed to wild SARS virus. The problem, highlighted in two studies, became obvious following post-vaccination challenge with the SARS virus [2]. found that recombinant SARS spike-protein-based vaccines not only failed to provide protection from SARS-CoV infection, but also that the mice experienced increased immunopathology with eosinophilic infiltrates in their lungs. Similarly [3], found that ferrets previously vaccinated against SARS-CoV also developed a strong inflammatory response in liver tissue (hepatitis). Both studies suspected a “cellular immune response”.
These types of unfortunate outcomes are sometimes referred to as “immune enhancement”; however, this nearly euphemistic phrase fails to convey the increased risk of illness and death due to prior exposure to the SARS spike protein. For this reason, I refer to the concept as “pathogen priming”; the peptides with pathogenic potential therefore are referred to as “putative pathogenic priming peptides”.
REG 174 INFORMATION FOR UK HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
5.3 Preclinical safety data
Non-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on a conventional study of repeat dose toxicity. Animal studies into potential toxicity to reproduction and development have not been completed.
Definitely .
If something in life is serious why are you mucking around with it. If we are in a pandemic why not try and get accurate information .
Why do we not have proper protocol's ? It's just a free for all everyone is doing different things provincially and around the world.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
Last edited by fishfood; December 20th, 2020 at 02:38 PM.
The love for money is the route of all evil...
I would think, no matter where you fall on the topic.
This article is extremely thoughtprovoking.
Obey the science
https://financialpost.com/opinion/20...to-the-science
Not sure about now, but in spring Nairobi was locked down. It's 5 million people. Aside from a few big cities, africa is mostly rural and very poor. Poor enough that if you look people down they starve. And the governments are poor enough (or smart enough) not to spend money they don't have. Outside of the northern arab countries, Johannesburg and the bad side of Nairobi, Africa is a pretty safe place to be. (North Africa - egypt, tunisia, morocco etc - is actually part of the middle east. It just looks like its in Africa when you look at a map).
Reply With Quote
