Where hunters should aim in discussing Bill C-21 on gun control

[Sam Menard]

Yea, but it looks scary!!!!

Exactly!!

[Fox]

Yea, but it looks scary!!!!

I have seen a lot of wood and steel guns with rusted bores that would scare me a lot more than an AR, safe for anything they are aimed at though.

[Gun Nut]

Divide and concur is what our corrupt dictatorship is doing with firearms owners.

Its always great when you have one group of firearms owners not supporting each other. Hunters not supporting sport shooters claiming they are weekend warriors that should choose a different hobby is exactly how divide and concur works.

The sport shooters will laugh when your bar or semi duck guns are banned in the name of public safety. Really why would half of gun owners (sport shooters) support hunters that continue to throw them under the bus. Some people are far to blind to see the big picture

What you say canadaman30 makes a good deal of sense:” Really why would half of gun owners (sport shooters) support hunters that continue to throw them under the bus. Some people are far to blind to see the big picture” But let me expand the hunting community a bit further, Because like the sport shooter there is another part of the hunting community itself that from time to time gets thrown under the bus as well, the indigenous hunter. I imagine Gilroy see that as a plus as it seems to mean more votes for his side. Also it has never been clear to me why they should be excluded from the hunting community because they have special treaty privileges.

You don’t stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun nut

[canadaman30]

What you say canadaman30 makes a good deal of sense:” Really why would half of gun owners (sport shooters) support hunters that continue to throw them under the bus. Some people are far to blind to see the big picture” But let me expand the hunting community a bit further, Because like the sport shooter there is another part of the hunting community itself that from time to time gets thrown under the bus as well, the indigenous hunter. I imagine Gilroy see that as a plus as it seems to mean more votes for his side.

You don’t stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun nut

This seems to be the standard of the extreme radical left. They now employ divide and concur across all groups. Think,..me too, cancel culture, global warming, shutting down oil industry, racism, transgender, defund police, be less white, covid fear, lockdowns, destruction of small business, open borders to illegal immigration, record national spending and debt, censorship, the list go's on.

Creating fear, confusion, anger and division, while claiming equality. What better way to push agendas amongst a nation so divided.

The Great Reset was a joke more than a year ago, making fun of conspiracy theorist kooks and nutjobs. Sadly some of our MP's, Freeland and Trudeau are deeply involved in Klaus Schwabs cult of globalist wannabes. Maybe not so much a joke?..

[impact]

This seems to be the standard of the extreme radical left. They now employ divide and concur across all groups. Think,..me too, cancel culture, global warming, shutting down oil industry, racism, transgender, defund police, be less white, covid fear, lockdowns, destruction of small business, open borders to illegal immigration, record national spending and debt, censorship, the list go's on.

Creating fear, confusion, anger and division, while claiming equality. What better way to push agendas amongst a nation so divided.

The Great Reset was a joke more than a year ago, making fun of conspiracy theorist kooks and nutjobs. Sadly some of our MP's, Freeland and Trudeau are deeply involved in Klaus Schwabs cult of globalist wannabes. Maybe not so much a joke?..

It is not a far stretch of the imagination to say that we are now in a cyber war with the Globalists. They are the instigators of all this unrest.
Stir the pot and bring in the Great Reset.

[canadaman30]

It is not a far stretch of the imagination to say that we are now in a cyber war with the Globalists. They are the instigators of all this unrest.
Stir the pot and bring in the Great Reset.

They globalists are definitely putting in their greatest efforts. It's going to be a bumpy ride for some time...

[Badenoch]

What you say canadaman30 makes a good deal of sense:” Really why would half of gun owners (sport shooters) support hunters that continue to throw them under the bus. Some people are far to blind to see the big picture” But let me expand the hunting community a bit further, Because like the sport shooter there is another part of the hunting community itself that from time to time gets thrown under the bus as well, the indigenous hunter. I imagine Gilroy see that as a plus as it seems to mean more votes for his side. Also it has never been clear to me why they should be excluded from the hunting community because they have special treaty privileges.

You don’t stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun nut

I don't see indigenous hunters being "thrown under the bus" but resented by some people because they are not under the same restrictions as non-indigenous hunters.

Gun ownership covers a wide range of uses and activities. The expectation that one group should instantly rally around another is sorely misguided. For example, if government decided to ban jet-skis it would be unlikely that kayakers or sailors would give a damn. Sport shooters should be content that people who own firearms primarily to hunt are not vocally supporting the ban on "assault style rifles" which is what the original post in this thread suggests.

[MikePal]

I don't see indigenous hunters being "thrown under the bus" but resented by some people because they are not under the same restrictions as non-indigenous hunters.

Gun ownership covers a wide range of uses and activities. The expectation that one group should instantly rally around another is sorely misguided.

There are a raft of 'hunters' who are also 'sport shooters'...finding sport shooters who Do NOT hunt would probably be the exception rather than the rule.

Anyone who owns a firearm should be against any gun ban as a matter of principle, because the insinuation is that the legal gun owners are the problem.

[canadaman30]

Gun ownership covers a wide range of uses and activities. The expectation that one group should instantly rally around another is sorely misguided. For example, if government decided to ban jet-skis it would be unlikely that kayakers or sailors would give a damn. Sport shooters should be content that people who own firearms primarily to hunt are not vocally supporting the ban on "assault style rifles" which is what the original post in this thread suggests.

Thanks for defining, divide and concur.

[mosquito]

There are a raft of 'hunters' who are also 'sport shooters'...finding sport shooters who Do NOT hunt would probably be the exception rather than the rule.

Anyone who owns a firearm should be against any gun ban as a matter of principle, because the insinuation is that the legal gun owners are the problem.

Anyone that cares about having a firearm or their rights should be against C-21, if you listen to the lawyers take on C-21, it is just plain terrible
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUV...KnF3heA/videos

The lies are huge and this article lists a few of them to go off in a different source from the CCFR and Runkles of the Bailey's videos
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...action-rifles/
In addition to banning a number of long range, bolt action rifles, Trudeau’s ban also bans .22 caliber rifles that are built on the AR-15 platform. Two such guns are the Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 and Mitchell Arms Car 15/22, both banned under Trudeau’s announcement.

or from another article
https://www.westernjournal.com/canad...mi-automatics/
“Minister Blair is either too inept to comprehend the scope of his regulations… or he lied to the government and Canadians,” the CSAAA said in a statement.


Incoherent and useless ... but some Fudds and Tru-Anon and all anti-firearms don't care about the realities, what next banning cars because there have been drunk drivers or hit and runs? If Justlied said it was to protect I am sure the Tru-Anon would be on board.