-
May 19th, 2021, 04:52 PM
#61
Originally Posted by
Badenoch
Fishing isn't the issue. To the civic officials in Port Hope the issue is people coming from outside of the region to fish in waters controlled by the municipality.
The waterway is controlled by Transport Canada
-
May 19th, 2021 04:52 PM
# ADS
-
May 19th, 2021, 06:33 PM
#62
Originally Posted by
Badenoch
There are 9 John/Jane Does either made up or too gutless to use their own names.
The ones who did I suspect have their pensions locked in because it is only a matter of time until they will be asked to turn in their retirement paperwork.
Bahaha....thanks for the laugh!
Last edited by impact; May 19th, 2021 at 06:37 PM.
-
May 19th, 2021, 07:37 PM
#63
Originally Posted by
greatwhite
Tell me. Have you ever gone over the speed limit??
Sure. But I do not go out driving with the intent of breaking the law so any excess speed is inadvertent. I also accept the consequences of my actions and unlike the anti-lockdown lunkheads don't whine and complain about my Charter rights being violated.
Last edited by Badenoch; May 19th, 2021 at 07:52 PM.
-
May 19th, 2021, 07:38 PM
#64
Originally Posted by
onelessarrow
The waterway is controlled by Transport Canada
The land to get to and from the waterway is not.
-
May 19th, 2021, 07:48 PM
#65
-
May 20th, 2021, 09:48 AM
#66
Originally Posted by
Badenoch
Fishing isn't the issue. To the civic officials in Port Hope the issue is people coming from outside of the region to fish in waters controlled by the municipality.
LOL ... are you unable to respond to a simple question??? ... I don't care what you think the issue is.
IS FISHING ESSENTIAL OR NON-ESSENTIAL???
You cannot even answer that question ... come on dude, stop playing this game of avoidance.
-
May 20th, 2021, 09:51 AM
#67
Originally Posted by
Badenoch
The land to get to and from the waterway is not.
(1) oh right, that land is open right now ... anyone is free to walk the paths, cops are not ticketing or questioning anyone on the paths. River access was granted on May 7th.
(2) the fishermen were in the water when they were asked to leave ... the municipal cops do not have authority in those waters, unless a criminal offence is taking place.
-
May 20th, 2021, 10:05 AM
#68
Originally Posted by
MarkB
LOL ... are you unable to respond to a simple question??? ... I don't care what you think the issue is.
IS FISHING ESSENTIAL OR NON-ESSENTIAL???
You cannot even answer that question ... come on dude, stop playing this game of avoidance.
Not sure why you are obsessed with my opinion on a question that is really not mine to answer but if it matters so much that you're going to shout about it the answer is yes and no.
For people who need to fish to feed themselves it is essential.
For jackasses living outside the region who violate the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act, drive to Port Hope and cast lines in the Ganaraksa simply to amuse themselves and relieve lockdown boredom it is non-essential.
Happy now?
-
May 20th, 2021, 10:30 AM
#69
Has too much time on their hands
Originally Posted by
Badenoch
Sure. But I do not go out driving with the intent of breaking the law so any excess speed is inadvertent. I also accept the consequences of my actions and unlike the anti-lockdown lunkheads don't whine and complain about my Charter rights being violated.
Anti-lockdown lunkheads at least don't walk around with their tail stuck between their legs, in fear of their masters.
-
May 20th, 2021, 10:59 AM
#70
Originally Posted by
Badenoch
For people who need to fish to feed themselves it is essential.
Fishing is classified as essential plain and simple no laws broken to fish. Doesn't matter if you need it as food who in Canada needs fish to eat because that is what they can afford. ?
The mnr even says fishing is good to go.
It's the moving around that's the issue. Under the stay at home order fishing is ok traveling great distance to fish is not ok .
Stay within reason and there is no issues.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
