Proof of Vaccination

[gbk]

Denmark 72% vaccinated

By Zero Hedge Friday, August 27, 2021

Denmark will on September 10th stop classifying Covid-19 as an “illness which is a critical threat to society”, meaning all remaining special pandemic restrictions will expire, The Local reported. In a press release issued on Friday morning, the country’s health minister Magnus Heunicke said that the high level of vaccination in Denmark, particularly among the vulnerable, had radically altered the risks posed by the virus.

“The epidemic is under control, we have record high vaccination rates,” he said in a statement. “As a result, on September 10th, we can drop some of the special rules we have had to introduce in the fight against Covid-19.”

September 10th marks the expiry date for that the executive order classifying Covid-19 as a “socially critical illness”, which was passed by the Danish parliament’s Epidemic Committee on March 10th last year.

The parties in the centre-right blue bloc, led by the Liberal Party, have already said that they believe that Covid-19 should no longer be classed as a serious threat to society, and the health ministry’s announcement came less than an hour before the ruling Social Democrats were due to discuss the issue with the other parties in the Epidemic Committee.
A number of restrictions are set to lapse on September 1st, notably the requirement to show a valid coronapass to sit in restaurants and bars, and the ban on discos and nightclubs.

Friday’s announcement means that just ten days after nightclubs reopen on September 1st, visitors will no longer have to show a coronapas, and it also means that from September 10th, those going to watch a Superliga football match or attend an outdoor event with more than 2,000 people, will no longer need a coronapas.

The change in the classification of Covid-19 will not, however, affect rules on travel into Denmark, which are governed by a separate inter-party agreement which is due to expire in October, a spokesperson for the health ministry said.

We can bet we will hear little if anything about Denmark and COVID.
What sucks is,that Ford lined up and goes along with all this..............

[trimmer21]

We can bet we will hear little if anything about Denmark and COVID.
What sucks is,that Ford lined up and goes along with all this..............

I get what he's doing,there. It's one of those "damned if you do,damned if you don't" type deals. If it was me,I'd rather be blamed for something I did that was advised by the medical community than be blamed by the legal community for not doing it.

[rick_iles]

I get what he's doing,there. It's one of those "damned if you do,damned if you don't" type deals. If it was me,I'd rather be blamed for something I did that was advised by the medical community than be blamed by the legal community for not doing it.

^^^This^^^

[smitty55]

"No, a previous infection is not a substitute for being fully vaccinated."

It's a fact that natural immunity after having recovered from Covid is far superior to any vaccine out there ever, yet they still want compliant sheep to get the jab. That tells me right there that this isn't so much about safety as it is about control. Why would someone who is already immune want to take an experimental vaccine with all the reports of adverse effects?

[MikePal]

Denmark will on September 10th stop classifying Covid-19 as an “illness which is a critical threat to society”, meaning all remaining special pandemic restrictions will expire, The Local reported. In a press release issued on Friday morning, the country’s health minister Magnus Heunicke said that the high level of vaccination in Denmark, particularly among the vulnerable, had radically altered the risks posed by the virus.

“The epidemic is under control, we have record high vaccination rates,” he said in a statement. “As a result, on September 10th, we can drop some of the special rules we have had to introduce in the fight against Covid-19.”

This is exactly what the Yukon is doing as a territory.

https://www.castlegarnews.com/news/y...-delta-threat/

[Cameracutter]

"No, a previous infection is not a substitute for being fully vaccinated."

It's a fact that natural immunity after having recovered from Covid is far superior to any vaccine out there ever, yet they still want compliant sheep to get the jab. That tells me right there that this isn't so much about safety as it is about control. Why would someone who is already immune want to take an experimental vaccine with all the reports of adverse effects?

So you believe the the science that if you’ve had covid you would have some resistance to getting it again? But you don’t believe the science involved in the vaccines? And anyone who take a vaccination is a compliant sheep, but not the people who are taking animal
heart worm drugs? Makes total sense.

[MikePal]

So you believe the the science that if you’ve had covid you would have some resistance to getting it again? But you don’t believe the science involved in the vaccines?

You're obviously not very well-educated and informed on this subject, yet you still try to argue points that have long been resolved and supported by those that take the time to keep abreast of what is going on.

Simply knowing the difference between a traditional viral vector vaccine and an mRNA vaccine will go a long way to helping you understand the why the traditional vaccines work and are better than the mRNA technology. Case in point...viral vector and natural immunity are still greater that 85% efficacy after 6 months (proven in Isreal) were as the efficacy mRNA vaccines have dropped below 35% efficacy after 6 months and now require a booster shot.

The drug Ivermetin (the prescription version) has been used in patients in many parts of the world for many years. They have also proven it is effective to counter the effects of the virus in those same regions that do not have Covid vaccines yet. While yes in North America, it's primarily an "animal heart worm drug" it is also a drug that saves human lives elsewhere.

the unfolding ivermectin culture war is reminiscent of last year’s polarizing debate on hydroxychloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine is another rather old drug, indicated for malaria. Like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine is on the World Health Organization’s essential drug list. Essential medicines support the priority healthcare needs of patients, particularly in developing nations, and are selected based on their public health relevance, evidence of safety and efficacy, and comparative cost-effectiveness.

Of all drugs right-wingers would have gravitated to, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are most unusual candidates, in that they’re largely used in humans in developing nations for conditions rarely seen in the U.S.

All the talk of ivermectin being a deworming agent for animals doesn’t do justice to its crucial role in combating two devastating neglected tropical diseases in humans: River blindness and lymphatic filariasis. These diseases impose a significant burden on public health, especially in developing nations.

[MikePal]

I get what he's doing,there. It's one of those "damned if you do,damned if you don't" type deals. If it was me,I'd rather be blamed for something I did that was advised by the medical community than be blamed by the legal community for not doing it.

In a live broadcast, he was explicate that he was still not in favour of these passports and highlighted that they were only a "temporary" measure. Been forced into compliance seems to be affecting even our elected officials.

The whole thing will crash and disappear once this health 'crisis' is degraded to what it's becoming around the world..a seasonal virus.

[gbk]

I have no knowledge of any leading and Governing Politician being successfully sued over any Official decision he/she made during their reigning.
Maybe i am missing something.

Going back an forth with publicly announced decision is not the best thing. IMHO.
Playing both sides of the spectrum leads nowhere, but to the hope of being re elected.

[MikePal]

Playing both sides of the spectrum leads nowhere, but to the hope of being re elected.

A rather cynical view, understandable in normal times, but I'm going to accept the HE didn't change his mind..he was forced into making an uncomfortable decision as Premier that he doesn't support. Sometimes it happens, have to remember that they are people too.