Rittenhouse trial

[impact]

I feel like this thread lacks a level of useless memes. You know, ones that make you role your eyes.

oh wait. Never mind. Job done.

Dedicated to you...lol

[Cameracutter]

Dedicated to you...lol

Since you guys like memes so much thought I’d try it…

9A0785CA-04BA-4FDC-A22C-15510D5C140B.jpeg

[impact]

Since you guys like memes so much thought I’d try it…

9A0785CA-04BA-4FDC-A22C-15510D5C140B.jpeg

Ahhhh look at you go. Can't stay on topic so need to deflect. Typical junior tactic...lol

[73hunter]

WE can argue that he should have never been there in the first,that he was a vigilante and that he put himself in the position,BUT,and it's a very BIG BUT,that what he did intially was NOT illegal under US law. That's why he was never charged. The fact remains and the ONLY fact that the dead guys were chasing the kid who was in full flight with every intention of removing himself from the scene. Even by Canadian law (notwithstanding that scenario,here,would be highly unlikely),it would still be self defense. Those idiots got what they deserved for being morons. I call the Darwin Award.

Yup agreed. He was not guilty according to the law and he was defending himself.

as is often the case, this thread has spiralled downward into another right/left circus…Gilly’s first post that I agreed with seemed logical to me but some of his posts since have gone off the rails. This thread shouldn’t be an arena to fight and re-hash every left vs right battle of the last decade

Anyone who’s read my posts in the past knows that I lean right, but I can’t imagine why any adult would look at this and come up with some of the posts I have read tonight. A few of us on the right need to think a little clearer, (this paragraph is not a reply to the post quoted above)

I wouldn’t have any issue at all with the kid protecting his family or home…I would applaud it…but that wasn’t the case and it doesn’t matter that it was only 20 minutes from his home , or that he had family in Kenosha because he wasn’t at their house…a kid took a loaded AR15 into a riot and found the trouble he went looking for. This time it worked out for him. Next time all the rioters might have AR’s too because they can….and when it starts….

[Cameracutter]

Ahhhh look at you go. Can't stay on topic so need to deflect. Typical junior tactic...lol

Just following your lead. Ask if I’m fisher mc what’s his name again, it is how you like to divert things.

[mosquito]

Ahhhh look at you go. Can't stay on topic so need to deflect. Typical junior tactic...lol

Just ignore him, he and another have nothing to actually contribute but distractions and disdain for the one that obeyed the law and hero worship of the criminals. I already posted their record and the CBC junk and trying to make it racial ... somehow.

https://www.oodmag.com/community/sho...=1#post1180034


and proved most of the b.s. about the AR as just that b.s.
https://www.oodmag.com/community/sho...=1#post1180152

from the 2nd link make note of the "racial" nature... sure doesn't fit the media and left divisive propaganda... one race protecting another using an AR-15....

Ferguson, Missouri (2014) — African-American men protected a white man’s store from rioters by standing outside armed with AR-15s.

There have been many examples of hate groups like BLM and ANTIFA marching screaming burn it down and causing tens of millions in damage but they and the bigots on MNSBC etc are a minority I would say. The good coverage that showed you what happened, like Rittenhouse being chased and hit, generally weren't the ones that were the major players. I think Tucker Carlson was the only one that showed more than 2 seconds of tape or just a still picture and told you what to think, also he actually showed the bigots spouting their lies, but hey they can ignore it if they want, doesn't change the facts though. Other than Fox the only ones that have been showing and talking honestly are few, here's an example from another post.

P.S.
Bongino and Damani Bryant Felder and Ian Runkle all have been interesting to listen to on different parts of this.
https://www.facebook.com/DamaniBryan...5782747539689/

There, that's the sum of it. Kid goes to protect and not burn and defends himself... and in so doing shoots actual criminals who the left now call heroes.... I hope he sues and gets tens of millions atleast! Time to ignore this thread, you can't convince the left ideologues and the others probably have seen enough to see a kid go through hell and I look forward to his being rich.

Oh as a P.S. ... another Liberal "hero" Omar Khadr... they call him a child at 16 when he built IEDs to kill and used a grenade to kill one soldier and wound another... yet they think he deserved the $10,000,000 and justify it. I'll take the video part out but leave the link, so here is a teen happily trying to kill and creating IEDs (Bombs) to kill... and they can justify paying him and blocking the widow from suing him.... I wonder if his sister is still in jail in the middle east on terrorism charges, I forget where she got arrested and found guilty.

Khadr building IEDs (how many were killed with these?) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rK8Ych7Z-8

I hope Kyle gets 10X the Khadr payout... after all if trying to kill and wound and maim is worth $10M then trying to protect, helping to put out fires and being attacked violently should be worth 10X that.

Have a good night.

[trimmer21]

Yup agreed. He was not guilty according to the law and he was defending himself.

as is often the case, this thread has spiralled downward into another right/left circus…Gilly’s first post that I agreed with seemed logical to me but some of his posts since have gone off the rails. This thread shouldn’t be an arena to fight and re-hash every left vs right battle of the last decade

Anyone who’s read my posts in the past knows that I lean right, but I can’t imagine why any adult would look at this and come up with some of the posts I have read tonight. A few of us on the right need to think a little clearer, (this paragraph is not a reply to the post quoted above)

I wouldn’t have any issue at all with the kid protecting his family or home…I would applaud it…but that wasn’t the case and it doesn’t matter that it was only 20 minutes from his home , or that he had family in Kenosha because he wasn’t at their house…a kid took a loaded AR15 into a riot and found the trouble he went looking for. This time it worked out for him. Next time all the rioters might have AR’s too because they can….and when it starts….

Yessir,the whole thing was truly bizarre. I,too,am amazed how quickly it fell into the abyss of left/right politics even before the jury was randomly chosen. It sure looks to me like this thread has run it's course. Might be time to lock it.

[smitty55]

Yup agreed. He was not guilty according to the law and he was defending himself. I wouldn’t have any issue at all with the kid protecting his family or home…I would applaud it…but that wasn’t the case and it doesn’t matter that it was only 20 minutes from his home , or that he had family in Kenosha because he wasn’t at their house…a kid took a loaded AR15 into a riot and found the trouble he went looking for. This time it worked out for him. Next time all the rioters might have AR’s too because they can….and when it starts….

So first you say he's not guilty and was defending himself, fine. Then somehow you assume he went looking for trouble because he was legally carrying a firearm like many do in the States, it's legal. You seem to be contradicting yourself. So his dad lives there and so do his grandparents, for all you know the reason he went armed was in case he had to protect their property. In fact, from what I've heard the gas station that those goons were targeting with the burning bin belonged to his grandfather, that's why he was so intent on putting out that fire and the rioters hated him for that and chased after him threatening to kill him. Doesn't sound to me like he went looking for trouble, not something a 17 year old would feel confident doing does it?

[fishfood]

Right, he was there for the free ice cream. Just happened to bring his rifle with him.

It's called peaceful protests.



Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

[Gilroy]

Well let me tell you something - when all the smoke clears Mr. Rittenhouse will be a very rich man - like that kid Sandmann - you better believe it

No Joe he will never be a very rich man, because he will be tortured by his conscience for the rest of his life.

What he is right now is a very LUCKY person and lucky in the sense that he could be dead. If the protestor armed with the handgun had the good sense to use it the moment this kid raised the gun even half an inch in the wrong direction the protester should have shot him dead.

The protester would claim the same right of self defense as claimed by this kid and guess what, even if he got charged the jury would have to decide if he was acting as a reasonable person would. So what do you think, a protester legally exercising his right to self defense using a handgun against a person who took it upon himself to attend a peaceful protest armed with a AR 15.

Well in IMHO the protester walks and this kid is dead, end of story. The witnesses would probably be all protester's so their evidence would all go to the defense. On the off chance there was a very good close up camera shot, it would come down to inches on the position of this kids gun barrel.

So Joe this is the situation you have in America, its the Wild West, the first guy who blinks and goes for his gun.

The best to hope from this situation is that this kid devotes the rest of his life to gun control in the USA and saves some lives, that way his life might be very rich.

We will be getting the jury's verdict on the Ahmaud Arbery murder trial where three white citizens also decided they were going to play Police officer and managed to shot a black unarmed jogger to death.

I expect and hope they are sentenced to life in prison.

If these guys get off then you have set the whole country up to be a WAR ZONE, everybody arming and everybody in each others face and everybody claiming the right of self defense. What a total mess.

Once again it shows the wisdom of the Liberal Government in Canada restricting access to firearms for public safety.