Page 13 of 17 FirstFirst ... 367891011121314151617 LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 164

Thread: Rittenhouse trial

  1. #121
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JoePa View Post
    When the Proud Boys and the Black Panthers have a shoot out I hope it is on TV so we can see it - should be good
    Don't be to cocky Joe you might get a very nasty surprise. I see a lot of fat, out of shape, middle aged proud boys who probably could not go on a half a mile run without having the big one. These are scared cowards who cannot handle themselves physically and need a firearms to protect themselves. No the USA has managed to military train a whole bunch of folks down there and they will all put that training to good use if the time comes. I will be betting on one side and it ain't the so called proud boys.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #122
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 73hunter View Post
    Smitty….he wasn’t “just carrying a firearm”…..he took a loaded firearm to the scene of a riot, with the intention of intervening. As I said…sitting on a front porch to defend property with that firearm is perfectly justified…what he did was go looking for trouble…..and just to be clear I blame everyone including the police and civilian authorities…they have jobs to do and failed.

    I’m surprised that you don’t see it this way, but I guess we’ll have to disagree.
    Excellent post, I think that is the way most reasonable thinking people see that situation.

  4. #123
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by js4fn View Post
    Yeh what,s wrong with that picture you have protesters exercising their right to bear arms in the exact same manner Rittenhouse did, except
    Rittenhouse chose to go out into a protest/ near riot situation and police it. The Judge inside refused to declare a mistrial because of the protesters outside in that photograph, so I am assuming from that they were legal and within their rights to not only bear arms but to protest.

  5. #124
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    Yeh what,s wrong with that picture you have protesters exercising their right to bear arms in the exact same manner Rittenhouse did, except
    Rittenhouse chose to go out into a protest/ near riot situation and police it. The Judge inside refused to declare a mistrial because of the protesters outside in that photograph, so I am assuming from that they were legal and within their rights to not only bear arms but to protest.
    Your liberal tears are showing gilroy need a Kleenex

  6. #125
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by js4fn View Post
    Your liberal tears are showing gilroy need a Kleenex
    That is about the quality of a reply we fully expect, do not address the question, insult the other guy and also expect respect when they post.

  7. #126
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Marching in the streets with loaded firearms under the guise of a "demonstration" is truly bizarre. 'merica,ma rights,baby!
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  8. #127
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    Marching in the streets with loaded firearms under the guise of a "demonstration" is truly bizarre. 'merica,ma rights,baby!
    Taking a loaded firearm to an already volatile demonstration as in Mr Rittenhouse is truly bizarre.

    Attending in front of Michigan's legislature with loaded firearms with the intent of shutting down the democratic process is truly bizarre.

  9. #128
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trimmer21 View Post
    Marching in the streets with loaded firearms under the guise of a "demonstration" is truly bizarre. 'merica,ma rights,baby!
    It is called intimidation.

  10. #129
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    Don't be to cocky Joe you might get a very nasty surprise. I see a lot of fat, out of shape, middle aged proud boys who probably could not go on a half a mile run without having the big one. These are scared cowards who cannot handle themselves physically and need a firearms to protect themselves. No the USA has managed to military train a whole bunch of folks down there and they will all put that training to good use if the time comes. I will be betting on one side and it ain't the so called proud boys.
    The military is already being put to good use to take away the rights of citizens.

    Understand that the Proud Boys were created firstly as a joke, a men's drinking club, and secondly as a response to relentless antifa violence and intimidation -- speakers getting assaulted with urine and faeces, etc. People finally said "ok, we'll fight back" They did and the kept winning, so that angered the establishment and they smeared the Proud Boys as white supremacists (despite being very racially mixed). They are deemed a domestic terror group while antifa still wreaks havoc. Figure that one out.

    Look what happened in Nova Scotia a few years ago where a few Proud Boy members of the military were thrown under the bus for questioning an aboriginal protest on Canada Day.

    As I've said in other threads this 'woke' direction of the country and the military -- which is the last vestige of strength, competence, meritocracy and national protection -- is not good.

  11. #130
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    2213 Bias

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushwhacker View Post
    The military is already being put to good use to take away the rights of citizens.

    Understand that the Proud Boys were created firstly as a joke, a men's drinking club, and secondly as a response to relentless antifa violence and intimidation -- speakers getting assaulted with urine and faeces, etc. People finally said "ok, we'll fight back" They did and the kept winning, so that angered the establishment and they smeared the Proud Boys as white supremacists (despite being very racially mixed). They are deemed a domestic terror group while antifa still wreaks havoc. Figure that one out.

    Look what happened in Nova Scotia a few years ago where a few Proud Boy members of the military were thrown under the bus for questioning an aboriginal protest on Canada Day.

    As I've said in other threads this 'woke' direction of the country and the military -- which is the last vestige of strength, competence, meritocracy and national protection -- is not good.
    Well when they can call a group run by a black Cuban a white supremacist........



    while groups like BLM march shouting about dead cops and ANTIFA burning it all down are ignored....
    https://www.lawofficer.com/antifa-me...eaten-to-burn/

    You know something is wrong with them mentally and morally.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •