Union's claim denied as arbitrator upholds mandatory vaccination policy

[Bushwhacker]

Look at the latest example of covid tyranny masquerading as scientific benevolence.

Another major company pledges to suspend without pay unjabbed employees -- even those who work from home lol. Bell certainly doesn’t walk the talk when it comes to employee mental health. Their entire 'let's talk' mental health initiative is a massive tax break. So it's no surprise they're forcing employees to undergo experimental medical procedures to continue working.

Attachment 42814

[finsfurfeathers]

Look at the latest example of covid tyranny masquerading as scientific benevolence.

Another major company pledges to suspend without pay unjabbed employees -- even those who work from home lol. Bell certainly doesn’t walk the talk when it comes to employee mental health. Their entire 'let's talk' mental health initiative is a massive tax break. So it's no surprise they're forcing employees to undergo experimental medical procedures to continue working.

Attachment 42814

As it states employment may require in person contact as the rationale. Can see if you want to stay at home....stay at home.

[finsfurfeathers]

Who's controling the doctors?

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Its their licensing body hence Doctors are.

[MikePal]

As it states employment may require in person contact as the rationale. Can see if you want to stay at home....stay at home.

Or get tested..then go to work, garb up in the same PPE you've been using for the past 18 mths ...was good enough before vaccines were jabbed into arms....why is it no good anymore ??

Un-infected unvaccinated are no threat to anyone, especially not the fully vaccinated...

[fishfood]

So who it taking the license away ?
Why ?

The news clip says that if a doctor is not vaccinated he can't push for them also they must lead by example.

So the question remains why are doctors loosing their license for not taking an emergency use experimental drugs.

Doctors are forced into taking this experimental vaccine should I , capitalize on the FORCED in taking something that they don't want.

What if they already covid ? Just ignore the science?




Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

[impact]

Given the stats you are just as likely to get infected by a vaxxed as an un-vaxxed.
Everyone is on the same equal footing.
People with comorbidities will suffer the most and since they are all pretty well double jabbed already what's the problem?
The rationale is out the window.

This is no longer about a virus but ensuring that everyone is jabbed multiple times including children.
Prove me wrong.

[finsfurfeathers]

Or get tested..then go to work, garb up in the same PPE you've been using for the past 18 mths ...was good enough before vaccines were jabbed into arms....why is it no good anymore ??

Un-infected unvaccinated are no threat to anyone, especially not the fully vaccinated...

Yup your right they are not a threat to anyone but themselves, however in society we have a duty to protect those who can't or won't protect themselves.

So who it taking the license away ?
Why ?

The news clip says that if a doctor is not vaccinated he can't push for them also they must lead by example.

So the question remains why are doctors loosing their license for not taking an emergency use experimental drugs.

Doctors are forced into taking this experimental vaccine should I , capitalize on the FORCED in taking something that they don't want.

What if they already covid ? Just ignore the science?




Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

They are not forced to take the jab its their choice. They are going against the accepted medical advice of the majority their peers. Isn't the medical advice of the majority of practitioners more credible than the whims of a few?

[fishfood]

Yup your right they are not a threat to anyone but themselves, however in society we have a duty to protect those who can't or won't protect themselves.



They are not forced to take the jab its their choice. They are going against the accepted medical advice of the majority their peers. Isn't the medical advice of the majority of practitioners more credible than the whims of a few?

And what happens if there is a problem with the shot ? Are they supposed to get half dozen or more shots untill they get the data.
Other places are pushing for 4 shots a year now

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

[finsfurfeathers]

And what happens if there is a problem with the shot ? Are they supposed to get half dozen or more shots untill they get the data.
Other places are pushing for 4 shots a year now

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

IF they want to wait for the data fine stay at home. Where are they pushing 4 shots a year?
Take a breath listen to the majority of professionals with more letters after their names than most.

[MikePal]

however in society we have a duty to protect those who can't or won't protect themselves.

Protecting them??? by forcing them out of a Job.

They're offering the be PCR tested...they're offering to take a serology test to prove they are recovered from the virus, yet all the zealots are willing to accept is forcing them to take vaccines they don't feel comfortable getting...and have the right (by law) to refuse.

"Duty to protect"...hardly.

Serology tests detect the presence of antibodies in the blood from the body's adaptive immune response to an infection, like COVID-19.

That's what the vaccine does.....so does having the virus and recovering.