Page 14 of 36 FirstFirst ... 478910111213141516171819202124 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 351

Thread: Ontario gunsmith shot and killed by police

  1. #131
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnjyb View Post
    And remember they even brought their own ambulance with them so that the local medical emergency teams wouldn't be over-worked. Very thoughtful.
    John
    You could get a job as a Spin Dr. for the Liberal party HaHa..

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #132
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Given what we already know and his refusal to speak with SIU, why hasn't he been arrested and charged?
    He went to a man's house and shot him dead. If I did that, I know where I would be spending Christmas.

  4. #133
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by werner.reiche View Post
    Given what we already know and his refusal to speak with SIU, why hasn't he been arrested and charged?
    He went to a man's house and shot him dead. If I did that, I know where I would be spending Christmas.
    You probably would be spending time in the bucket, but your not a LEO engaged in the performance of your duty. At this stage we do not know what happened inside the premises. The officer is not compelled to speak to anybody, you would have the same rights as a civilian.
    If he was forced to give a statement "it would not be admissible in court" because a statement must be proven to have been voluntary in every sense of that word. If there are grounds for a charge the officer will be charged, its been done before and will again if the evidence warrants it.

  5. #134
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    You probably would be spending time in the bucket, but your not a LEO engaged in the performance of your duty. At this stage we do not know what happened inside the premises. The officer is not compelled to speak to anybody, you would have the same rights as a civilian.
    If he was forced to give a statement "it would not be admissible in court" because a statement must be proven to have been voluntary in every sense of that word. If there are grounds for a charge the officer will be charged, its been done before and will again if the evidence warrants it.
    "LEOs performing their duties" outside of their jurisdiction without co-ordination from local authorities???
    Something really stinks about this.
    I would think that co-operating with SIU is also part of an officers duties. It would be very strange if it is not.
    All though the SIU is a civilian organisation - supposedly outside the influence of police force - it appears it does not have enough power.
    What is going on here makes the entire Ontario policing stucture look pretty darn shady.

  6. #135
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by werner.reiche View Post
    "LEOs performing their duties" outside of their jurisdiction without co-ordination from local authorities???
    Something really stinks about this.
    I would think that co-operating with SIU is also part of an officers duties. It would be very strange if it is not.
    All though the SIU is a civilian organisation - supposedly outside the influence of police force - it appears it does not have enough power.
    What is going on here makes the entire Ontario policing stucture look pretty darn shady.
    The police were not “out of their jurisdiction”…There is also no rules that force police to advise another service that they are working in their area. The SIU will no doubt conclude their investigation….just takes time.
    “If you’re not a Liberal by twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a Conservative by forty, you have no brain.”
    -Winston Churchill

  7. #136
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    The police were not “out of their jurisdiction”…There is also no rules that force police to advise another service that they are working in their area. The SIU will no doubt conclude their investigation….just takes time.
    Why are Toronto police doing a firearms check out in Norfolk county???
    I don't have a background in how police operate - but by all accounts of this that I come across, this operation did not follow any of the norms of policing.

  8. #137
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by werner.reiche View Post
    Why are Toronto police doing a firearms check out in Norfolk county???
    I don't have a background in how police operate - but by all accounts of this that I come across, this operation did not follow any of the norms of policing.
    It’s not uncommon for investigations to take officers out of their area. Police in Ontario are officers in all of Ontario. As far as not involving another service members, it usually means their investigation is sensitive in nature, or they have information that the other service members may inadvertently disclose sensitive information, prior to the search. The part I find out of the norm, is that they had an ambulance and crew on the standby.
    There’s a lot of questions I’d like to hear the answers to, but more information will no doubt come to light.
    “If you’re not a Liberal by twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a Conservative by forty, you have no brain.”
    -Winston Churchill

  9. #138
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    We are all curious as to how this will unfold. Will we be told why the warrant needed to be delivered in this manner? It sure seems to me that they wanted him dead for some reason. Why did a crew like this drive over an hour to search a gun repair shop with one 70 year old owner/employee? They left the city, where gang members are shooting each other on a nightly basis. Seems strange to me.

  10. #139
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    You probably would be spending time in the bucket, but your not a LEO engaged in the performance of your duty. At this stage we do not know what happened inside the premises. The officer is not compelled to speak to anybody, you would have the same rights as a civilian.
    If he was forced to give a statement "it would not be admissible in court" because a statement must be proven to have been voluntary in every sense of that word. If there are grounds for a charge the officer will be charged, its been done before and will again if the evidence warrants it.
    And what's your opinion about the fact that a warrant was neither presented nor left behind at the premises ?

  11. #140
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by werner.reiche View Post
    "LEOs performing their duties" outside of their jurisdiction without co-ordination from local authorities???
    Something really stinks about this.
    I would think that co-operating with SIU is also part of an officers duties. It would be very strange if it is not.
    All though the SIU is a civilian organisation - supposedly outside the influence of police force - it appears it does not have enough power.
    What is going on here makes the entire Ontario policing stucture look pretty darn shady.
    Police officers have the same Charter rights as anyone else. Once you start limiting Charter rights for anyone yours are in jeopardy too. Witness officers however are required to cooperate.

    SIU investigations while not particularly time are meticulous and the results are made public. Here's a link to some past reports.

    https://www.siu.on.ca/en/directors_reports.php

    The SIU investigates and then recommends to the Crown whether charges are appropriate. It's not a perfect system but it is preferable to the police investigating the police.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •