Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: Anti gun activists within carneys cabinet ?

  1. #11
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    FFF, this thread was brought up by a respected member here. We as hunters and responsible gun owners should be aware of this issue. It’s always the same people that derail a perfectly legitimate topic.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #12
    Mod Squad

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gregger17 View Post
    FFF, this thread was brought up by a respected member here. We as hunters and responsible gun owners should be aware of this issue. It’s always the same people that derail a perfectly legitimate topic.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    yes and that's why the reminder to discuss the thread topic at hand, just keep it respectful.
    blah blah blah heavy handed mod blah blah. Its a thankless job but we try do the best we can
    Time in the outdoors is never wasted

  4. #13
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Provost isn't in cabinet yet and even if she is it's not worth panicking about. There are plenty of equally anti-gun Liberals in the government, RCMP and civil service. One more won't matter.

  5. #14
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by finsfurfeathers View Post
    yes and that's why the reminder to discuss the thread topic at hand, just keep it respectful.
    blah blah blah heavy handed mod blah blah. Its a thankless job but we try do the best we can
    I think you’re doing a heck of a job FFF. Me think you might get really busy..blah blah blah lol. Hunting and firearms related issues are why I’m here though.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #15
    Mod Squad

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gregger17 View Post
    I think you’re doing a heck of a job FFF. Me think you might get really busy..blah blah blah lol. Hunting and firearms related issues are why I’m here though.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    "Like button"
    TS

  7. #16
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TroutSlayer View Post
    "Like button"
    Say,speaking of,has anyone decided to include a "like" button on this forum? I don't really see a downside.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  8. #17
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gregger17 View Post
    FFF, this thread was brought up by a respected member here. We as hunters and responsible gun owners should be aware of this issue. It’s always the same people that derail a perfectly legitimate topic.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Thanks

    Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk

  9. #18
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badenoch View Post
    Provost isn't in cabinet yet and even if she is it's not worth panicking about. There are plenty of equally anti-gun Liberals in the government, RCMP and civil service. One more won't matter.
    Nope not yet but her name was splashed around on the Globe and mail the other day along with another climate activists

    Its might be a concern if some idiot does something stupid. With some firearms that hasn't yet been banned yet.

    All guns can be used to assault someone. My FIL thinks nobody should own them unless you hunt and then still should be limited a single shot so nobody can go on a shooting spree.

    Do we blame the black suv for the tragedy that unfolded last week? Or the person behind the wheel . Shootings should be no different it's the person responsible not the tool they used. Unfortunately we blame the tool rather than the person when it comes to firearms.


    1 is all it takes for the law abiding citizens to loose their privileges. We should rid all the activists from government lol some of them have have large friends.


    Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk
    Last edited by fishfood; May 3rd, 2025 at 09:37 AM.

  10. #19
    Mod Squad

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishfood View Post
    Do we blame the black suv for the tragedy that unfolded last week? Or the person behind the wheel .

    Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk
    No but already there is a review in progress for harm reduction namely the need/requirements for measures to prevent/minimize such incidents from happening again.
    So when it comes to firearms how do we balance individual rights and society protection. Fair question how many shots are reasonable for hunting and too many for civil harm reduction?
    Time in the outdoors is never wasted

  11. #20
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Do you really think criminals—like gang members—are going to obey magazine capacity limits?

    Since the Trudeau government came into power, gun violence involving criminals has noticeably increased. Instead of cracking down on lawbreakers, the focus seems to be on targeting law-abiding gun owners.

    Maybe it’s time to get serious about keeping violent offenders behind bars.

    Take the tragic case of the Nova Scotia shooter. Trudeau initially claimed the firearms were sourced from Canadian hunters and farmers. That turned out to be false—the killer had smuggled them in from the U.S. Even worse, the RCMP had received multiple reports that this individual had illegal firearms, and that he had even built a near-perfect replica of a police cruiser—yet they failed to act.

    This wasn’t just a local policing failure. The RCMP reports to the federal government. That means accountability ultimately rests with Ottawa.

    Quote Originally Posted by finsfurfeathers View Post
    No but already there is a review in progress for harm reduction namely the need/requirements for measures to prevent/minimize such incidents from happening again.
    So when it comes to firearms how do we balance individual rights and society protection. Fair question how many shots are reasonable for hunting and too many for civil harm reduction?
    "This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •