-
April 30th, 2025, 04:25 PM
#11
FFF, this thread was brought up by a respected member here. We as hunters and responsible gun owners should be aware of this issue. It’s always the same people that derail a perfectly legitimate topic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
April 30th, 2025 04:25 PM
# ADS
-
April 30th, 2025, 05:50 PM
#12

Originally Posted by
Gregger17
FFF, this thread was brought up by a respected member here. We as hunters and responsible gun owners should be aware of this issue. It’s always the same people that derail a perfectly legitimate topic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes and that's why the reminder to discuss the thread topic at hand, just keep it respectful.
blah blah blah heavy handed mod blah blah. Its a thankless job but we try do the best we can
Time in the outdoors is never wasted
-
May 1st, 2025, 07:06 AM
#13
Provost isn't in cabinet yet and even if she is it's not worth panicking about. There are plenty of equally anti-gun Liberals in the government, RCMP and civil service. One more won't matter.
-
May 1st, 2025, 12:54 PM
#14

Originally Posted by
finsfurfeathers
yes and that's why the reminder to discuss the thread topic at hand, just keep it respectful.
blah blah blah heavy handed mod blah blah. Its a thankless job but we try do the best we can
I think you’re doing a heck of a job FFF. Me think you might get really busy..blah blah blah lol. Hunting and firearms related issues are why I’m here though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
May 1st, 2025, 01:03 PM
#15

Originally Posted by
Gregger17
I think you’re doing a heck of a job FFF. Me think you might get really busy..blah blah blah lol. Hunting and firearms related issues are why I’m here though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Like button"
-
May 1st, 2025, 02:21 PM
#16

Originally Posted by
TroutSlayer
"Like button"
Say,speaking of,has anyone decided to include a "like" button on this forum? I don't really see a downside.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
May 3rd, 2025, 09:05 AM
#17

Originally Posted by
Gregger17
FFF, this thread was brought up by a respected member here. We as hunters and responsible gun owners should be aware of this issue. It’s always the same people that derail a perfectly legitimate topic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks
Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk
-
May 3rd, 2025, 09:30 AM
#18

Originally Posted by
Badenoch
Provost isn't in cabinet yet and even if she is it's not worth panicking about. There are plenty of equally anti-gun Liberals in the government, RCMP and civil service. One more won't matter.
Nope not yet but her name was splashed around on the Globe and mail the other day along with another climate activists
Its might be a concern if some idiot does something stupid. With some firearms that hasn't yet been banned yet.
All guns can be used to assault someone. My FIL thinks nobody should own them unless you hunt and then still should be limited a single shot so nobody can go on a shooting spree.
Do we blame the black suv for the tragedy that unfolded last week? Or the person behind the wheel . Shootings should be no different it's the person responsible not the tool they used. Unfortunately we blame the tool rather than the person when it comes to firearms.
1 is all it takes for the law abiding citizens to loose their privileges. We should rid all the activists from government lol some of them have have large friends.
Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk
Last edited by fishfood; May 3rd, 2025 at 09:37 AM.
-
May 3rd, 2025, 11:02 AM
#19

Originally Posted by
fishfood
Do we blame the black suv for the tragedy that unfolded last week? Or the person behind the wheel .
Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk
No but already there is a review in progress for harm reduction namely the need/requirements for measures to prevent/minimize such incidents from happening again.
So when it comes to firearms how do we balance individual rights and society protection. Fair question how many shots are reasonable for hunting and too many for civil harm reduction?
Time in the outdoors is never wasted
-
May 3rd, 2025, 11:22 AM
#20
Do you really think criminals—like gang members—are going to obey magazine capacity limits?
Since the Trudeau government came into power, gun violence involving criminals has noticeably increased. Instead of cracking down on lawbreakers, the focus seems to be on targeting law-abiding gun owners.
Maybe it’s time to get serious about keeping violent offenders behind bars.
Take the tragic case of the Nova Scotia shooter. Trudeau initially claimed the firearms were sourced from Canadian hunters and farmers. That turned out to be false—the killer had smuggled them in from the U.S. Even worse, the RCMP had received multiple reports that this individual had illegal firearms, and that he had even built a near-perfect replica of a police cruiser—yet they failed to act.
This wasn’t just a local policing failure. The RCMP reports to the federal government. That means accountability ultimately rests with Ottawa.

Originally Posted by
finsfurfeathers
No but already there is a review in progress for harm reduction namely the need/requirements for measures to prevent/minimize such incidents from happening again.
So when it comes to firearms how do we balance individual rights and society protection. Fair question how many shots are reasonable for hunting and too many for civil harm reduction?
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member