-
June 12th, 2014, 08:48 AM
#1
A bit of confusion
Hi Everyone,
I'm a new hunter and just have a couple of questions, because I've been told different things by different hunters. On page 29 of the new regulations book it says "With the exception of furbearing mammals, you may not let the flesh of any harvested game wildlife (see Definitions, page 86), that is suitable for food, become spoiled or abandoned. This includes black bear. A hunter who kills a furbearing mammal shall not abandon the pelt or permit the pelt to be spoiled or destroyed."
I only hunt small game mostly just coyotes and groundhogs. So the question is when I kill a coyote I skin the animal, but if I don't that is illegal? For the rest of the body (the meat) I can leave that or use it later as bait for other animals? Finally, with groundhogs I have to use the meat because I've been told that you must and other hunters say you can leave it or you it as bait for coyotes.
Thanks for the clarification.
-
June 12th, 2014 08:48 AM
# ADS
-
June 12th, 2014, 09:18 AM
#2
My understanding of the reg summary is that a groundhog is not listed as either a furbearing mammal or game animal, so you don't have to collect the pelt or the meat.
-
June 12th, 2014, 09:28 AM
#3

Originally Posted by
rf2
My understanding of the reg summary is that a groundhog is not listed as either a furbearing mammal or game animal, so you don't have to collect the pelt or the meat.
You're absolutely correct. Groundhogs are classed as "varmints" and have been known to carry rabies. Coyotes are also varmints/predators,but,are also classed as "furbearers" when pelts are in "prime" condition from late autumn through late winter. Use of "prime" pelts are required. The key word in the regulations is "usable". Mangy,injured or otherwise damaged pelts aren't generally required to be harvested.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
June 12th, 2014, 01:33 PM
#4
So to be classified as varmint they wouldn't be scheduled under the 97 Act?
-
June 12th, 2014, 03:47 PM
#5

Originally Posted by
Yotehunter
So to be classified as varmint they wouldn't be scheduled under the 97 Act?
Yes,Coyotes are,only as far as being "furbearers",but,they're still varmints,groundhogs are not classified,at all,other than being "small game" and requiring a license. In this area of Ontario,there's an open season all year for both.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
June 12th, 2014, 04:49 PM
#6
I don't believe there is any mention or classification of "varmint " in the FWCA anymore.
-
June 12th, 2014, 06:59 PM
#7

Originally Posted by
rick_iles
I don't believe there is any mention or classification of "varmint " in the FWCA anymore.
As a matter of fact,I believe you're right. It was dropped when the old Act was re-written.
If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....
-
June 14th, 2014, 10:00 AM
#8
-
June 14th, 2014, 07:17 PM
#9
But then again the good old groundhog does taste a lot like chicken when quartered and done on the BBQ. ....I've even passed it off to neighbourhood teenagers as such.
-
June 14th, 2014, 07:43 PM
#10

Originally Posted by
Pat32rf
But then again the good old groundhog does taste a lot like chicken when quartered and done on the BBQ. ....I've even passed it off to neighbourhood teenagers as such.
Funny shaped drum stick. Of course I know people that think chicken comes in little triangle shaped nuggets. Try to give them a drum stick, and they won't eat it.
Last edited by Snowwalker; June 16th, 2014 at 07:38 PM.
Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.