Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 51

Thread: Trouble at Hullett Marsh

  1. #31
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Apparently The Toronto Sun scans OOD for news to print.

    http://www.torontosun.com/2014/09/15...servation-area
    You have enemies? Good. That means you stood up for something sometime in your life!

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by skeeter1 View Post
    How's about we let the police do their job and not jump to any unfounded conclusions based on nothing, if they are not telling you there is a reason. They are there to solve the crime, not appease those following the case.

    YES! Thank You!! If the OPP thought the public was in any danger they would be letting people know.

  4. #33
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Not to worry. The Toronto star has lawyers in front of a judge petitioning to release all information right? I mean the public has to be involved with every step of an ongoing investigation no?
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  5. #34
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by terrym View Post
    Not to worry. The Toronto star has lawyers in front of a judge petitioning to release all information right? I mean the public has to be involved with every step of an ongoing investigation no?
    No, not really. The investigators will not release information that may jeopardize the investigation. They have to be very careful now, with the advent of social media. Information now is instantaneous. The suspects could very well be monitoring news releases and any other information bits that get reported. But, if there were any public safety issues, those would certainly be released.

  6. #35
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    No, not really. The investigators will not release information that may jeopardize the investigation. They have to be very careful now, with the advent of social media. Information now is instantaneous. The suspects could very well be monitoring news releases and any other information bits that get reported. But, if there were any public safety issues, those would certainly be released.
    Absolutely. You wouldn't believe the extremes the Police use to protect information. That was the main reason all communications went "digital" many years ago. What's heard by people using a scanner doesn't even begin to scratch the surface. Actually,scanners are completely redundant. You might hear stuff on the "C&D" channel when the gang heads to Tim Horton's,but,that's about all.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  7. #36
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    No, not really. The investigators will not release information that may jeopardize the investigation. They have to be very careful now, with the advent of social media. Information now is instantaneous. The suspects could very well be monitoring news releases and any other information bits that get reported. But, if there were any public safety issues, those would certainly be released.
    You didn't pickup on my sarcasm. I find this now normal need to have all information hit the media seconds after it happens likely counter productive in investigations. People do not "need" to know 90% of the stuff that gets printed unless there truly is a public safety issue.
    There are already all kinds of uninformed idiots out there declaring what are likely false and cruel to the deceased families statements. Let the damned police do their jobs and lets hope they catch this murderer. I hope it isn't some nutbar antihunter. In this F'd up world you never know.
    Last edited by terrym; September 15th, 2014 at 03:46 PM.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  8. #37
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    If rob ford was there all info would of been released...
    Member of the OFAH, CCFR/CCDAF.
    http://firearmrights.ca/

  9. #38
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    The speculations in this thread are quite amusing

  10. #39
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by topher View Post
    If rob ford was there all info would of been released...
    Only if Bill Blair and The Star was there,first.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  11. #40
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CocoZoo View Post
    The speculations in this thread are quite amusing
    Normally, the police would release the identity of the victim after next of kin were notified. In this case next of kin were notified yesterday (according to CTV) but police didn't identify the victim until after it leaked out through the grapevine to the media. That kind of secrecy fuels speculation which of course leads to worst case scenarios....

    There could be any number of scenarios here of course and speculation is futile. According to the G&M, Eva Frigo escaped with minor injuries and she did not know who the attacker was. One suspects, however, that all is hush-hush because the cops have very little to go on.
    "The language of dogs and birds teaches you your own language."
    -- Jim Harrison (1937 - 2016)

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •