-
December 12th, 2014, 10:59 AM
#71
Man for an old fella you beat me to the response. 

Originally Posted by
400bigbear
Here is my question to you and lets see your straight answer Did you read all the posts in this thread ? He even got an answer from a retired CO and it wasn't good enough for him so you can well understand I'm sure of why things get a bit twisted at times Read every post .
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
December 12th, 2014 10:59 AM
# ADS
-
December 12th, 2014, 11:52 AM
#72

Originally Posted by
Gern1980
Well there it is numpty! Welcome to hunt Ontario lol. You ask about regs and stuff on paper and you will get massive discussion from the internet gurus along with a little grief because you aren't in the clique. That my friend will take about 500-1000 posts of sucking up. Of course you can't accomplish that if your actually out doors enjoying and doing what this place is supposed to be about.
So when you get a guy ask questions about actual outdoor such as shed hunting he'll get a couple comments over three days and that's it. Ask about interpreting regs and dozens of will chime in within hours lol.
...but it is entertaining as heck by times so don't let the fellas with carpal tunnel bother you ha ha!
So those of us who have access to a PC during the day must be less of an outdoorsman than someone who lives in South River?
Must suck posting replies via dial-up.....don't worry....I'll wait for your response tonight.......
The main purpose of tagging an animal is being able to confirm kill #s, and the WMU where taken.
I hunt in an area that is where 3 WMUs meet ( 56,57,and 60), I know the COs in that area are very diligent about making sure antlerless are tagged properly.
"Camo" is perfectly acceptable as a favorite colour.
Proud member - Delta Waterfowl, CSSA, and OFAH
-
December 12th, 2014, 12:28 PM
#73
Yes I did and if you go to the start and read also maybe you can point out the response that the person identified themselves as a CO before certain members had to act the way they did. He referenced the rules as he read them and was looking for clarification.

Originally Posted by
400bigbear
Here is my question to you and lets see your straight answer Did you read all the posts in this thread ? He even got an answer from a retired CO and it wasn't good enough for him so you can well understand I'm sure of why things get a bit twisted at times Read every post .
-
December 12th, 2014, 12:34 PM
#74
this is a forum for discussion. if he just wanted the answer ..... he can look it up!
-
December 12th, 2014, 12:35 PM
#75

Originally Posted by
Numpty
Anyone see anything wrong with removing the deer seal to take pictures? As long as it's attached while it's being transported i'm ok right?
Nope! as I see it while transporting tag attached . Now I butcher myself so once the animal is here ready to be processed That tag is off and tacked to the wall . And let the camera happen. In the field Take the pic's you want ? Skeeter mentioned what if tag holder is 4km away ? reg's say everyone has to hunt within 5 km of tag holder and be reliably in communication distance . So why not snap some pic's while your waiting? If your implying ? Taging then removing for the photo op then reapplying in the field ...Not a good idea / bad ! Besides that sticky tag doesn't come apart once stuck I find?
-
December 12th, 2014, 12:49 PM
#76
Been stopped multiple times coming home from moose hunting. Parts of the carcass I was carrying had no tags. However, all I needed to satisfy co's were the tag #'s and the individuals names on the tags.
A properly used tag that's been removed is a USED tag with dates to verify.
-
December 12th, 2014, 12:54 PM
#77
I don't think anyone is going to point out who the CO is. Some on here know but it would not be correct to identify him. Point is there were some appropriate comments to the OP and he clearly said he didn't like them.

Originally Posted by
klums
Yes I did and if you go to the start and read also maybe you can point out the response that the person identified themselves as a CO before certain members had to act the way they did. He referenced the rules as he read them and was looking for clarification.
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
December 12th, 2014, 12:56 PM
#78
Yup nothing wrong with that take the photo's first. But once the tag has been attached do not remove until ready to process.

Originally Posted by
Exo200
Nope! as I see it while transporting tag attached . Now I butcher myself so once the animal is here ready to be processed That tag is off and tacked to the wall . And let the camera happen. In the field Take the pic's you want ? Skeeter mentioned what if tag holder is 4km away ? reg's say everyone has to hunt within 5 km of tag holder and be reliably in communication distance . So why not snap some pic's while your waiting? If your implying ? Taging then removing for the photo op then reapplying in the field ...Not a good idea / bad ! Besides that sticky tag doesn't come apart once stuck I find?
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
December 12th, 2014, 01:16 PM
#79

Originally Posted by
klums
Yes I did and if you go to the start and read also maybe you can point out the response that the person identified themselves as a CO before certain members had to act the way they did. He referenced the rules as he read them and was looking for clarification.
Not sure how long you have been around but it is common knowledge who the retired CO is and one poster even basically pointed it out and why his response should be given much weight . Also Klums you do realize that these types of threads get started by students yearly just so us the guinea pigs ( ood membership ) help these students with their term paper . We are the study group being analyzed . Whether Numpty is one I don't know but it has that same old odor . This will occur again when the next semester starts . The Op started the thread He got quite a few answers but he did not want the answer but instead wanted to debate the interpretation of the law . And now here you come with your sword . Well get waving it all you want .
-
December 12th, 2014, 02:09 PM
#80

Originally Posted by
400bigbear
Not sure how long you have been around but it is common knowledge who the retired CO is and one poster even basically pointed it out and why his response should be given much weight . Also Klums you do realize that these types of threads get started by students yearly just so us the guinea pigs ( ood membership ) help these students with their term paper . We are the study group being analyzed . Whether Numpty is one I don't know but it has that same old odor . This will occur again when the next semester starts . The Op started the thread He got quite a few answers but he did not want the answer but instead wanted to debate the interpretation of the law . And now here you come with your sword . Well get waving it all you want .
If it's a term paper he / she got their insight? Would certainly like to see his / Her final submission to their accredited school to their finding's ? As a read through the reg's would of helped them a lot ? But I know you need to show research !! So yes a nice tool we have for them here? Sort of suck's as I had to open a book or find the book to find answer's !!