Bill C-231

[trimmer21]

I tend to think that this Bill is being ignored by the media because it is so blatantly flawed. I am guardedly optimistic that even the left-wing media has learned enough to understand the blurry definition of 'hunting rifles'.
Add to this her foolish comments Re: LEOs having guns at Parliament and that gaff she made with the seal hunt and her response to the American tourists.
If Wendy isn't jumping on this one it should be telling everyone that even Cukier thinks Hervieux-Payette has been eating too many boiled vegetables out of aluminum pots!

I would agree along those lines,too. The lady is usually right off the wall at the best of times,anyway. It would be prudent to not discount the idea,completely,because with some minor tweaks,this idea could gain legs in short order should the Liberals or the NDP form the next government.

[Karl Marques]

Pretty sure an AK47 is not legal to hunt with already. It's either restricted or prohibited as I think they can be switched to full auto bursts.

This proposed bill would be a blessing! It would lift all restrictions on all guns. Seriously though, there are a lot of really good points made in this thread. Welsh, you have the air of lawyerness about you, lol. I only fear that all these really great points just fall on deaf ears and don't get out to the people that need to hear them. We're obviously all into shooting and hunting if we're on this forum. I can't help but always feel like we're preaching to the choir.

[mosquito]

I couldn't find a single media outlet, including the Opinion and Editorial sections, that made even a mention of it over the weekend.

It may have been a trial balloon, but so far it looks like it went over like a lead balloon.

Only one covered it.


The Rebel.
Senator Crazy Pants....
http://www.therebel.media/now_senator_crazy_pants

[DGearyFTE]

LMAO... according to The Rebel... a walking one-woman argument for Senate Reform.

[Hunter John]

Crazy pants IS crazy for sure but don't be fooled , Many like her actually believe the crap she put forth in that bill.

[mosquito]

Crazy pants IS crazy for sure but don't be fooled , Many like her actually believe the crap she put forth in that bill.

Justin Trudeau has talked about the "need" to "reclassify firearms to make Canada safer".... think all semi-auto firearms (rifle or shotgun) in the same category as the AK-47....

and look at his comments on the changes to modernize the Authorization to Transport on C-42.

https://www.liberal.ca/lpc-opposes-cpc-gun-bill/

"“First, it eliminates the need for owners of prohibited and restricted firearms to have a transportation license to carry those guns in their vehicles. This means they could freely transport handguns or automatic weapons anywhere within their province, whether to a grocery store or a soccer field."
Fear mongering gone nutso!

[welsh]

I don't think gun control will be on anyone's agenda as long as the majority of the House is filled with Conservative Senators, it would be pointless of the Liberal/NDP party to alienate voters when there is no chance of a bill ever being passed/adopted.

If the Liberals have a majority in the Commons, a Conservative-dominated Senate would be very unlikely to block any bill they passed ... it is very rare for the Senate to block a bill passed by the Commons for the simple reason that the Senate is well aware it is an unelected body.

When was the last time the Senate actually blocked government legislation?

If Wendy isn't jumping on this one it should be telling everyone that even Cukier thinks Hervieux-Payette has been eating too many boiled vegetables out of aluminum pots!

The Coalition for Gun Control has not even mentioned this bill ... they're too busy making a fuss about Bill C-42, which apparently the Conservatives intend to squeeze through Parliament before the election.

It could be this is not a trial balloon, but simply the anti-gunners in the Liberal party trying to advance their agenda: trying to make an issue of it so the party will have to make a stand. Because despite what everyone likes to think, the Liberals won't try to make any serious gun control changes unless the polls tell them there's an advantage to be gained.

[Fishy Wishy]

If the Liberals have a majority in the Commons, a Conservative-dominated Senate would be very unlikely to block any bill they passed ... it is very rare for the Senate to block a bill passed by the Commons for the simple reason that the Senate is well aware it is an unelected body.

When was the last time the Senate actually blocked government legislation?

Which is what makes me wonder. "What exactly is the Senate doing?" I have though ya sure the sober second thought thing is a good thing...then someone mentioned (what I already knew) these are mostly patronage posts, (and what I hadn't considered) it isn't like they have any special knowledge of constitutional law or.....

The Coalition for Gun Control has not even mentioned this bill ... they're too busy making a fuss about Bill C-42, which apparently the Conservatives intend to squeeze through Parliament before the election.

It could be this is not a trial balloon, but simply the anti-gunners in the Liberal party trying to advance their agenda: trying to make an issue of it so the party will have to make a stand. Because despite what everyone likes to think, the Liberals won't try to make any serious gun control changes unless the polls tell them there's an advantage to be gained.

Can I save this and bring it up next year, or whenever they make their move?

[MikePal]

If the Liberals have a majority in the Commons, a Conservative-dominated Senate would be very unlikely to block any bill they passed ... it is very rare for the Senate to block a bill passed by the Commons for the simple reason that the Senate is well aware it is an unelected body.

When was the last time the Senate actually blocked government legislation?

Because you asked...recent memory was the Union Disclosure Bill in 2013. Interestingly it was a Conservative bill too !!

Conservative-dominated Senate blocks union disclosure bill


The Conservative-dominated Senate wrapped up one of its most difficult sittings in recent memory by flexing its legislative muscle, breaking ranks with the government to block a union-disclosure bill from becoming law.


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle12826672/

Interesting link says there were 672 times the senators have stopped a bill for one reason or another.

http://www.parl.gc.ca/ParlInfo/compi...NotPassed.aspx

[terrym]

It will be interesting to see how the Senate evolves after this massive body blow the auditor just tabled. The SCC pretty well clipped Harper's wings on reform without a full Constitutional review so other than being more transparent and less entitled there really isn't anything Trudough or Mulcair can do if and when they take power. Mulcair being the loudest critic ( easy to be with no dogs in the race) could find himself in a position to appoint Senators something he has ranted against. Would NDP Senators be any more honorable? Jack LAyton and Olivia Chow are on record of using the budget at Stornaway to live large. Not sure how Mulcair uses tax payer money?