Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 61

Thread: Shortening Up a Big Running Bird dog

  1. #31
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ugo View Post
    This sounds like more of a discussion about e-collars than effective range.
    All-too-often, I hear, "No, no, my dog points steady, no problem but he works too far." That is my first warning that the dog is not reliably broke the way it should be.
    In my opinion, a functional closer pattern for a flusher is critical. It is one of the main components of handling as I see it. Once I have a pattern on my flusher, a BIG part of the job is completed (if it's a well bred flusher).
    Range is not as critical for the hunting dog as the terrain and the application of the species being hunted. 200 yards on the prairies might still be effective while many find that down-right renegade in the grouse woods.
    I like to build co-operation by virtue of rewarding success (...this is what works vs this does not work) which is the result of foundation training followed up by experience afield.
    For a flusher to be effective it must work to the gun. For a pointer, it must work to the species/habitat.
    I am often surprised at how many pointing dog owners insist that their pointers work to the gun by a flushing breed's definition. This is most often supported by their past experiences with poorly trained pointing dogs that don't hold point or do not have experience with wild birds.
    Yes, a pointing dog can run too big if after stabbing a find, the time taken to locate and flush results in an unproductive because the bird(s) has departed. A pointing dog that lolly-gags around at 40 yards is not likely to be productive on wild birds for a number of reasons. Perhaps it can handle pen-raised birds but not wild birds. An effective pointing dog MUST have pace. This, and a nose to go with said pace is what hammers wily birds into the ground so that the hunter has a reasonable amount of time to approach and flush.
    Keep in mind that the most challenging part of approaching a pointing dog in the grouse woods is that where you would typically find grouse, there are a healthy number of blow-downs, dead-falls, very dense cover. In this example, range isn't as much an issue as approaching quietly enough to make the closing sequence successful. I have often prematurely flushed well-pointed grouse that my dog has nailed simply because, hard as I tried, I sounded like a derailed freight train on the approach!
    Most often, folk want to apply numbers to effective range - 50 yards for grouse, 100 for woodcock, 200 for Huns, etc. (Sort of like how some shot-gunners want to know how much lead they should use for the birds they are hunting. Both are of no use.) This has very little value because each and every situation is unique unto itself. There are too many other variables that are salient parts of this equation to apply a fixed value!
    My setter handles at roughly 200 yards on either side of very dense northern Ontario grouse woods. Much more than that on the prairies. Most folk would consider this extreme. Fact is, she handles like she is on a string with VERY little input from me. She finds AND handles many grouse and provides a large number of opportunities for me. I long-ago discovered that Emma figured out this:
    The further from me she was (within reason) the more successful she was on pegging her finds and getting rewarded with a bird to retrieve.
    If you apply the logic, it is not a leap. Like I said, try as I may, I still make lots of noise negotiating productive grouse cover. Her rangy, stealthy, fast paced, wide spread application proves VERY productive. Her owner - not so much so.
    If you are working a young dog, plant your birds so that the range your dog finds birds at will serve you on your preferred quarry. They are programmable in this regard. Use similar habitat that your preferred game birds utilize for training/planting in, and let that pointing dog do it's job, which unlike a flusher, is to use it's nose, experience and instinctsto go to likely objectives rather than a wind-shield wiper pattern and finally, allow her/him to take you to birds rather than the other way around.
    There is no harm in patterning your pointing dog if this is the style of hunting you believe will serve you and what you hunt most however understand that with experience, your dog will learn what is productive cover. He/she will also deduct the most effective AND productive range as well as the course to be successful along with your support.
    you should seriously consider writing a book

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I've told him that, but he's busy training dogs.
    ( saving that post Ugo. Thanks.))
    Last edited by Sharon; July 21st, 2015 at 03:08 PM.
    " We are more than our gender, skin color, class, sexuality or age; we are unlimited potential, and can not be defined by one label." quote A. Bartlett


  4. #33
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ugo View Post
    I would like to apologize for the very long-winded response. It can be difficult to cover all the variables when answering something that addresses a wide-spread demographic. Again.........sorry.
    Those were compliments you got, not a comment of a long post.
    " We are more than our gender, skin color, class, sexuality or age; we are unlimited potential, and can not be defined by one label." quote A. Bartlett


  5. #34
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Ugo always has the best answers and most of all Polite !

  6. #35
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    When he takes the time to share advice like that I take notes. Many others here should too.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  7. #36
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    There's a difference of opinion often on whether an e collar correction should be used to keep a dog in the range you want. ( after conditioning to that request with the e collar of course). Should it be used for that purpose?

    I assume a flusher is close enough to respond to a voice command to stay in the range you have trained for , but what about a big running pointing breed?


    Thoughts on this ? Your opinion too Ugo please.
    " We are more than our gender, skin color, class, sexuality or age; we are unlimited potential, and can not be defined by one label." quote A. Bartlett


  8. #37
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    If my dog is within whistle range and not responding to it "and not working a bird" I have no issue giving him a tap. He knows damn well what the whistle means. I would never tap him if he is out of sight though. He is quite predictable when he catches scent so I'm comfortable making the distinction. His pace changes and his head drops before he locks up on point. He wears the collar every time he leaves the house but very rarely needs a correction anymore. As for range I have no problem with him "Zamboning" a field. It's what I pay him to do. In tight woodcock & grouse cover he is never out of beeper range so if he goes on point I hear him. In open fields he seems to limit himself to 200 yds before checking in and I like that pace.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  9. #38
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharon View Post
    I've told him that, but he's busy training dogs.
    ( saving that post Ugo. Thanks.))
    it's hard to find good books nowadays. last month I picked up books about dog training from the 1920s and 1930s. sure the "techniques" are "dated", but a book conveys so much more than a post, blog or a youtube video ever can.
    Risking I sound half a century older than I am, I'd wish there are current (and authentic) books out there!
    Last edited by Waftrudnir; July 21st, 2015 at 04:41 PM.

  10. #39
    Mod Squad

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by terrym View Post
    If my dog is within whistle range and not responding to it "and not working a bird" I have no issue giving him a tap. He knows damn well what the whistle means. I would never tap him if he is out of sight though. He is quite predictable when he catches scent so I'm comfortable making the distinction. His pace changes and his head drops before he locks up on point. He wears the collar every time he leaves the house but very rarely needs a correction anymore. As for range I have no problem with him "Zamboning" a field. It's what I pay him to do. In tight woodcock & grouse cover he is never out of beeper range so if he goes on point I hear him. In open fields he seems to limit himself to 200 yds before checking in and I like that pace.
    Could not of said it better. Again you are not keeping them in range with the e collar you are reinforcing the back command.
    Time in the outdoors is never wasted

  11. #40
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by terrym View Post
    If my dog is within whistle range and not responding to it "and not working a bird" I have no issue giving him a tap. He knows damn well what the whistle means. I would never tap him if he is out of sight though. He is quite predictable when he catches scent so I'm comfortable making the distinction. His pace changes and his head drops before he locks up on point. He wears the collar every time he leaves the house but very rarely needs a correction anymore. As for range I have no problem with him "Zamboning" a field. It's what I pay him to do. In tight woodcock & grouse cover he is never out of beeper range so if he goes on point I hear him. In open fields he seems to limit himself to 200 yds before checking in and I like that pace.
    Well said!

    ( I'm 70 next year Wafrudnir , and started training bird dogs in 1995. In 2000started using the book Point! by Horace Lyttle . Would use it again to day.)
    Last edited by Sharon; July 21st, 2015 at 04:49 PM.
    " We are more than our gender, skin color, class, sexuality or age; we are unlimited potential, and can not be defined by one label." quote A. Bartlett


Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •