Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 87

Thread: Cecil The Lion

  1. #61
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    There are four northern white rhinos left according to cnn. I wonder what they are worth. ? How many sharks got killed for their fins last year. Over a hundred thousand. On and on

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #62
    Coarse fish magnet

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I guess i fall under the category of antis, seeing as to how i cannot begin to fathom why anyone in their right mind will take an animal that has no dietary value, if you aren't going to eat it, what's the point of killing it ?

    What sort of pride do you obtain from shooting any kind of animal that you will not harvest in it's entirety ?

    If you end up donating a giraffe to local populations, that's one thing.

    But what do you after you kill a big cat ?
    Those who profit from death, misery, and destruction have mastered propaganda and the art of persuasion - There will always be the "Other"

  4. #63
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Afraz View Post
    I guess i fall under the category of antis, seeing as to how i cannot begin to fathom why anyone in their right mind will take an animal that has no dietary value, if you aren't going to eat it, what's the point of killing it ?

    What sort of pride do you obtain from shooting any kind of animal that you will not harvest in it's entirety ?

    If you end up donating a giraffe to local populations, that's one thing.

    But what do you after you kill a big cat ?
    Definitely an anti statement afraz. Why don't you start a thread entitled, "if you don't eat the crows and coyotes you shoot then you shouldn't be hunting and I'm against you." See how many local friends you make with that one....

  5. #64
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Interesting article on the possible future of African hunting ...

    Dr. Rosie Clooney is Chair of the Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

    Zimbabwe: R.I.P Cecil the Lion. What Will Be His Legacy? and Who Decides?

    OPINION

    By Dr. Rosie Clooney

    London — Cecil the lion, a magnificent senior male, much loved and part of a long-term research project, was lured out of a safe haven in Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park last week and apparently illegally shot, to endure a protracted death.

    As the global outrage pours out, consider for a moment that trophy hunting has now been banned across Africa. Trophy hunting is the limited "high value" end of hunting, where people (often the wealthy and mainly Westerners) pay top dollar to kill an animal. In southern Africa it takes place across an area close on twice the sum total of National Parks in the region.

    Hwange Park staff numbers have been radically cut, and there is little money for cars or equipment for protection. Bushmeat poaching is on the rise and the rangers are ill equipped to cope.

    It arouses disgust and revulsion - animals are killed for sport - in some cases (such as lions) the meat not even eaten. Even the millions of weekend recreational hunters filling their freezers are uncertain about trophy hunting.

    It seems to have little place in the modern world, where humanity is moving toward an ethical position that increasingly grants animals more of the moral rights that humanity grants (in principle at least) to each other.

    So let us move now through the thought bubble where the EU and North America ban import of trophies, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe and others ban trophy hunting, the airlines and shipping lines refuse to carry trophies, and the industry dies a slow (or fast) death, ridding the world of this toxic stain on our collective conscience

    We turn to survey southern Africa, proud of what we have achieved by our signing of online petitions, our lobbying of politicians, our Facebook shares and comments.

    Did we save lions? Have we safeguarded wildlife areas? Have we dealt the death blow to trafficking of wildlife? Have we liberated local communities from imperialistic foreign hunters?

    Let's go back to Hwange National Park, the scene of Cecil's demise. The Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, responsible for managing this and other National Parks, is now in trouble.

    It derived most of its income for protection, conservation and management of wildlife across the country from trophy hunting, with minimal revenue from central government (not well known for its good governance and transparent resource allocation).

    Hwange Park staff numbers have been radically cut, and there is little money for cars or equipment for protection. Bushmeat poaching is on the rise and the rangers are ill equipped to cope. The commonly used wire snares are indiscriminate, and capture many lions and other predators who die agonizing and pointless deaths.

    In Namibia, more than half of the communal conservancies (covering 20 percent of the country) have collapsed, because the revenue from non-hunting sources (such as tourism) is not enough to keep them viable and they have not been able to find alternative sources of income.

    Namibia's communal conservancies are an innovation of the 1990s, and have been responsible for dramatic increases in a wide range of wildlife species outside of national parks including elephant, lion, and black rhino. Income from trophy hunting and tourism has encouraged communities to turn their land over to conservation.

    Communities retain 100 percent of benefits from sustainable use of wildlife, including hunting - almost 18 million Namibian dollars in 2013. This money was spent by communities on schools, healthcare, roads, training, and the employment of 530 game guards to protect their wildlife.

    Almost two million high protein meals a year were a by-product of the hunting. Now this is all gone. A few conservancies managed to find wealthy philanthropic donors to prevent them going under - but they cross their fingers that the generosity will continue to flow for decades to come.

    Game guards are unemployed, unable to feed their families, looking for any opportunity to obtain some income. Communities are angry - they were never asked by the world what they thought about this. Few journalists or social media activists ever reflected their side of the story. Conservation authorities and communities are again becoming enemies.

    Where the conservancies have collapsed, the wildlife is largely wiped out. The bad old days pre-reform have returned, and wildlife is worth more dead than alive.

    Hungry bellies are fed with poached bushmeat and the armed poaching gangs have moved in - communities are no longer interested in feeding information to police to help protect wildlife, game guard programmes have collapsed for lack of funds and have spare targeted to supply the criminal syndicates, and rhino horns, lion bone, and ivory are being shipped out illicitly to East Asia.

    In South Africa, trophy hunting has stopped, including the small proportion that was "canned". On the private game ranches that covered some 20 million hectares of the country, though, revenues from wildlife have effectively collapsed.

    Those properties with scenic landscapes that are close to major tourist routes or attractions and have good tourism infrastructure are surviving on revenues from phototourism, but gone are the days of expanding their wildlife asset base by buying land and restocking this with additional wildlife. Most of the other landowners have returned to cattle, goats and crop farming in order to educate their children, run a car, pay their mortgages.

    Wildlife on these lands has largely gone along with its habitat - back to the degraded agriculture landscapes that prevailed before the 1970s when wildlife use by landholders (including hunting) became legal here.

    Lions that were on these farmlands are long gone, and the few that remain in national parks are shot as problem animals as soon as they leave the park. The great conservation success story of South Africa is rapidly unraveling.

    Speculative? Yes, but a reasonable prediction, because this has happened before. Bans on trophy hunting in Tanzania 1973-1978, Kenya in 1977 and in Zambia from 2000-2003 accelerated a rapid loss of wildlife due to the removal of incentives for conservation. Early anecdotal reports suggest similar patterns are already happening in Botswana, which banned all hunting last year.

    Let us mourn Cecil, but be careful what you wish for.

  6. #65
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KMG Canada View Post
    Interesting article on the possible future of African hunting ...

    Dr. Rosie Clooney is Chair of the Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group at the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

    Zimbabwe: R.I.P Cecil the Lion. What Will Be His Legacy? and Who Decides?

    OPINION

    By Dr. Rosie Clooney

    London — Cecil the lion, a magnificent senior male, much loved and part of a long-term research project, was lured out of a safe haven in Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park last week and apparently illegally shot, to endure a protracted death.

    As the global outrage pours out, consider for a moment that trophy hunting has now been banned across Africa. Trophy hunting is the limited "high value" end of hunting, where people (often the wealthy and mainly Westerners) pay top dollar to kill an animal. In southern Africa it takes place across an area close on twice the sum total of National Parks in the region.

    Hwange Park staff numbers have been radically cut, and there is little money for cars or equipment for protection. Bushmeat poaching is on the rise and the rangers are ill equipped to cope.

    It arouses disgust and revulsion - animals are killed for sport - in some cases (such as lions) the meat not even eaten. Even the millions of weekend recreational hunters filling their freezers are uncertain about trophy hunting.

    It seems to have little place in the modern world, where humanity is moving toward an ethical position that increasingly grants animals more of the moral rights that humanity grants (in principle at least) to each other.

    So let us move now through the thought bubble where the EU and North America ban import of trophies, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe and others ban trophy hunting, the airlines and shipping lines refuse to carry trophies, and the industry dies a slow (or fast) death, ridding the world of this toxic stain on our collective conscience

    We turn to survey southern Africa, proud of what we have achieved by our signing of online petitions, our lobbying of politicians, our Facebook shares and comments.

    Did we save lions? Have we safeguarded wildlife areas? Have we dealt the death blow to trafficking of wildlife? Have we liberated local communities from imperialistic foreign hunters?

    Let's go back to Hwange National Park, the scene of Cecil's demise. The Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority, responsible for managing this and other National Parks, is now in trouble.

    It derived most of its income for protection, conservation and management of wildlife across the country from trophy hunting, with minimal revenue from central government (not well known for its good governance and transparent resource allocation).

    Hwange Park staff numbers have been radically cut, and there is little money for cars or equipment for protection. Bushmeat poaching is on the rise and the rangers are ill equipped to cope. The commonly used wire snares are indiscriminate, and capture many lions and other predators who die agonizing and pointless deaths.

    In Namibia, more than half of the communal conservancies (covering 20 percent of the country) have collapsed, because the revenue from non-hunting sources (such as tourism) is not enough to keep them viable and they have not been able to find alternative sources of income.

    Namibia's communal conservancies are an innovation of the 1990s, and have been responsible for dramatic increases in a wide range of wildlife species outside of national parks including elephant, lion, and black rhino. Income from trophy hunting and tourism has encouraged communities to turn their land over to conservation.

    Communities retain 100 percent of benefits from sustainable use of wildlife, including hunting - almost 18 million Namibian dollars in 2013. This money was spent by communities on schools, healthcare, roads, training, and the employment of 530 game guards to protect their wildlife.

    Almost two million high protein meals a year were a by-product of the hunting. Now this is all gone. A few conservancies managed to find wealthy philanthropic donors to prevent them going under - but they cross their fingers that the generosity will continue to flow for decades to come.

    Game guards are unemployed, unable to feed their families, looking for any opportunity to obtain some income. Communities are angry - they were never asked by the world what they thought about this. Few journalists or social media activists ever reflected their side of the story. Conservation authorities and communities are again becoming enemies.

    Where the conservancies have collapsed, the wildlife is largely wiped out. The bad old days pre-reform have returned, and wildlife is worth more dead than alive.

    Hungry bellies are fed with poached bushmeat and the armed poaching gangs have moved in - communities are no longer interested in feeding information to police to help protect wildlife, game guard programmes have collapsed for lack of funds and have spare targeted to supply the criminal syndicates, and rhino horns, lion bone, and ivory are being shipped out illicitly to East Asia.

    In South Africa, trophy hunting has stopped, including the small proportion that was "canned". On the private game ranches that covered some 20 million hectares of the country, though, revenues from wildlife have effectively collapsed.

    Those properties with scenic landscapes that are close to major tourist routes or attractions and have good tourism infrastructure are surviving on revenues from phototourism, but gone are the days of expanding their wildlife asset base by buying land and restocking this with additional wildlife. Most of the other landowners have returned to cattle, goats and crop farming in order to educate their children, run a car, pay their mortgages.

    Wildlife on these lands has largely gone along with its habitat - back to the degraded agriculture landscapes that prevailed before the 1970s when wildlife use by landholders (including hunting) became legal here.

    Lions that were on these farmlands are long gone, and the few that remain in national parks are shot as problem animals as soon as they leave the park. The great conservation success story of South Africa is rapidly unraveling.

    Speculative? Yes, but a reasonable prediction, because this has happened before. Bans on trophy hunting in Tanzania 1973-1978, Kenya in 1977 and in Zambia from 2000-2003 accelerated a rapid loss of wildlife due to the removal of incentives for conservation. Early anecdotal reports suggest similar patterns are already happening in Botswana, which banned all hunting last year.

    Let us mourn Cecil, but be careful what you wish for.
    That was a great read, thanks for posting.

  7. #66
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    A very good read..... I hope the ones wishing to pull the plug on this type of hunting see the other side and just don't look away.
    "Everything is easy when you know how"
    "Meat is not grown in stores"

  8. #67
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Afraz View Post
    I guess i fall under the category of antis, seeing as to how i cannot begin to fathom why anyone in their right mind will take an animal that has no dietary value, if you aren't going to eat it, what's the point of killing it ?

    What sort of pride do you obtain from shooting any kind of animal that you will not harvest in it's entirety ?

    If you end up donating a giraffe to local populations, that's one thing.

    But what do you after you kill a big cat ?
    If that is the way you feel, I would not be posting such feelings on this forum , best to keep them to yourself.

  9. #68
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Afraz View Post
    I guess i fall under the category of antis, seeing as to how i cannot begin to fathom why anyone in their right mind will take an animal that has no dietary value, if you aren't going to eat it, what's the point of killing it ?

    What sort of pride do you obtain from shooting any kind of animal that you will not harvest in it's entirety ?

    If you end up donating a giraffe to local populations, that's one thing.

    But what do you after you kill a big cat ?
    Sorry,but i have to disagree with this post. Do you expect people to eat the coyotes,foxes,badgers,skunks etcetera that are taken for their pelts? So I guess by your logic, all of us trappers and predator hunters are not of sound minds????

  10. #69
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Humans use animals in many ways. Sometimes it isn't pretty. When a lion is legally killed the money it generates is enormous in those countries. People exploit whatever natural resources are available to them. When it's done with proper over site and laws local people win. Even if the meat isn't consumed by humans quite often if is used as bait to assist another hunter kill another animal and pay huge money to do it. The hide of a lion also generates money with taxidermists so the trickle down economics of a well heeled hunter on Safari is substantial. People like to eat "Pate" but if you saw how the ducks and geese are treated to produce the monstrously enlarged livers needed many would freak. Yet that industry thrives. There aren't many alternative sources of income on many of these safari destinations. The wealthy Western "Progressives" with their crocodile skin handbags should stay the hell out of their business.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  11. #70
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by terrym View Post
    Humans use animals in many ways. Sometimes it isn't pretty. When a lion is legally killed the money it generates is enormous in those countries. People exploit whatever natural resources are available to them. When it's done with proper over site and laws local people win. Even if the meat isn't consumed by humans quite often if is used as bait to assist another hunter kill another animal and pay huge money to do it. The hide of a lion also generates money with taxidermists so the trickle down economics of a well heeled hunter on Safari is substantial. People like to eat "Pate" but if you saw how the ducks and geese are treated to produce the monstrously enlarged livers needed many would freak. Yet that industry thrives. There aren't many alternative sources of income on many of these safari destinations. The wealthy Western "Progressives" with their crocodile skin handbags should stay the hell out of their business.



    My wife and I watched a program a few days ago and it was on how they make " crocodile skin handbags" and the price ? you wouldn't believe it, $ 36,000.00 we both sat there and at the same time uttered " WOW ".

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •