Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 86

Thread: Two more "wild" Boars spotted in Caledon

  1. #31
    Leads by example

    User Info Menu

    Default

    awww guys, let's remember, they look innocent enough at first, but regardless of political colour, they're all HOGS AT THE TROUGH in the end !!

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    It says " if owners of escaped wild boars cannot be determined", does that mean you have to ask around before you shoot them ,or that the owners have to put up missing wild boar signs?
    from GW's link ...

    MNRF staff persons have been unable to determine the owner of these animals. As a result, the MNRF is authorizing landowners and hunters to kill any wild boars sighted as per Section 54 (5) of the FWCA.

  4. #33
    Apprentice

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Species8472 View Post
    My 15 year old son dropped a 260 pound boar in its tracks in Texas last March. He was using a .308 firing 165 grain accubonds. Broke both shoulders and exited.
    Hi species. Just curious as to whether or not you got to eat any of the meat. If you did, how was it? Thanks. J

  5. #34
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    The biggest problem I can see with hunters trying to shoot hogs in Southern ontario is the calibre limits placed on them..
    The smallest calibre I would want to hunt them with is a 7mm. Now I know lots of small hogs are taken with head shots by people( kids ) with .223's. But if you have to depend on only headshots that makes things harder. With larger hogs calibres below 7mm can bounce off the head ( mostly frontial and higher on the sides).
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

  6. #35
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    270 win or 280 Remington should be fine. Anything that can be used for Moose / bear etc should be good to go.

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowwalker View Post
    The biggest problem I can see with hunters trying to shoot hogs in Southern ontario is the calibre limits placed on them..
    The smallest calibre I would want to hunt them with is a 7mm. Now I know lots of small hogs are taken with head shots by people( kids ) with .223's. But if you have to depend on only headshots that makes things harder. With larger hogs calibres below 7mm can bounce off the head ( mostly frontial and higher on the sides).
    "This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member

  7. #36
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowwalker View Post
    The biggest problem I can see with hunters trying to shoot hogs in Southern ontario is the calibre limits placed on them..
    The smallest calibre I would want to hunt them with is a 7mm. Now I know lots of small hogs are taken with head shots by people( kids ) with .223's. But if you have to depend on only headshots that makes things harder. With larger hogs calibres below 7mm can bounce off the head ( mostly frontial and higher on the sides).
    You cannot use anything bigger than 270 for hunting small game, I would think that eradicating a boar that is on your property does not become part of small game hunting.

    I know what you mean though, a 12ga slug would do just fine on one though and most people in SW Ontario who have to deal with the caliber restrictions are in areas that are shotgun only for deer so they are generally good to go.

  8. #37
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fox View Post
    You cannot use anything bigger than 270 for hunting small game, I would think that eradicating a boar that is on your property does not become part of small game hunting.

    I know what you mean though, a 12ga slug would do just fine on one though and most people in SW Ontario who have to deal with the caliber restrictions are in areas that are shotgun only for deer so they are generally good to go.
    According to my BILand nephew (WNY and Georgia) you're right about the .270Win. It seems it's the go-to for long range which is required a lot in hunting open fields. Boars have good eyesight and keen hearing and smell,especially if they've been shot at recently and can hear a truck door close a quarter of a mile away or pick out human scent from a rancid hog wallow. They are exceedingly intelligent. A .270Win kills 'em dead and would be ideal for southern Ontario.
    Last edited by trimmer21; August 14th, 2015 at 10:52 PM. Reason: sp

  9. #38
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 73hunter View Post
    Species, I enjoyed reading about your trip south in the spring - I've read somewhere that the hogs have a large plate-like bone in the shoulder area that makes penetration to the vitals a little challenging - what did you find when butchering the ones you dropped ?

    how about a .243 with 100 grain bullet ? friend of mine and I were talking about a trip south sometime in the future, he was thinking his .223 would do the trick but I think it would be a bit light
    The shield on the hogs we took was very similar to cartilage. On the 260 pound beast it was almost 3/4 of an inch thick. Talking to the guides in Texas a .243 would work but bullet construction is very important. So a for instance a 100 grain SST would not be the best choice but a 100 grain partition or similar tough bonded bullet (we were using accubonds) would be a better choice. The .223 would not be something I would use on cross body vitals shot. Anyone we met using .223s was taking neck or head shots exclusively.
    The wilderness is not a stadium where I satisfy my ambition to achieve, it is the cathedral where I worship.

  10. #39
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flowerjohn View Post
    Hi species. Just curious as to whether or not you got to eat any of the meat. If you did, how was it? Thanks. J
    Eaten a fair bit of it. The bacon was better than your average store bought. The ribs are average and the roasts and chops all need to be marinated for a day or two or they are tough. Flavour was similar to pork but with a gamey twist but still very good (IMO).
    The wilderness is not a stadium where I satisfy my ambition to achieve, it is the cathedral where I worship.

  11. #40
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    No matter what gov. is in power, do you not think that we will have to have a licence to hunt any new game available? To say that hunting licences are a Liberal thing, is stretching it more than a little bit.
    I am not so sure trimmer was 100 % serious,maybe yes,maybe no?

    And I was just kind of making a light hearted comment.

    And you are correct in stating licences are not just a Liberal thing. I was not thinking that ,nor did I mean to imply that.

    It was just kind of an off hand comment that "she" seems to have an abundance of ideas for "revenue tools",A.K.A. "taxes".

    I am quite sure she would impose a bed room tax, every time we use our beds for somthing other than sleeping,if she could figure out the logistics of it. SARCASM,but you get my drift?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •