Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: OPP probe of Sudbury byelection controversy stalled

  1. #1
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default OPP probe of Sudbury byelection controversy stalled

    Here's an update.

    “Because of a pile of stuff that is going on there I am obviously frustrated with the progress,” OPP Commissioner Vince Hawkes told the Star.

    While Hawkes declined to assign blame for the politically sensitive case being in limbo, he insisted it’s not the fault of his investigators.


    ww.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2015/09/17/opp-probe-of-sudbury-byelection-controversy-stalled.html

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #2
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Nothing to see here folks... Shame.

  4. #3
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    The liberals have now bought off all the public sector. She's in until she decides to leave. Virtually impossible to remove her now.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  5. #4
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    All I'm prepared to say at this point, until it plays out, is that at best the optics are brutal.
    Don't forget the kingmaker (Liberal insider Wynne pinned it on) was on the Sudbury Police services board.

    Don't like.... at all.
    w
    hile Hawkes declined to assign blame for the politically sensitive case being in limbo, he insisted it’s not the fault of his investigators
    Hello, wasn't it the OPP who after being called in, in early December.....And having heard the tapes....In January said "No evidence of wrongdoing".
    And it wasn't until the tapes went public.......that they changed their mind and....

    So which is it.
    Door #1) Did the OPP try and hope to sweep it under the rug
    Door #2) Did the OPP not hear what we heard? Did the OPP hire a bunch of key stone cops.

    Theres no real wiggle room or door number 3.
    Su um yeah, no matter how its sliced its "your fault".

    Last edited by JBen; September 17th, 2015 at 11:47 AM.

  6. #5
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    This investigation should not have been handled by the OPP. Since when does a police officer investigate his/her employer ??!! This clearly should have been handed off to the RCMP.
    The Commissioners comment makes me believe that the investigators are getting interference from the players ! Not that this corrupt bunch haven't done that before !
    Last edited by rick_iles; September 17th, 2015 at 02:12 PM.

  7. #6
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    This investigation should not have been handled by the OPP. Since when does a police officer investigate his/her employer ??!! This clearly should have been handed off to the RCMP.
    The Commissioners comment makes me believe that the investigators are getting interference from the players ! Not that this corrupt bunch haven't done that before !
    I may have said this some place before,but,no doubt,the "word" has come down from "on high". Woe betide any Judge or JP who even so much as entertains the thought of processing any information that will lead to charges against the "inner sanctum". This NOT rocket science to anyone who has ever served in the public service,especially with law enforcement.

  8. #7
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    B A N A N A Republic of Ontari-owe.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  9. #8
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    This investigation should not have been handd by the OPP. Since when does a police officer investigate his/her employer ??!! This clearly should have been handed off to the RCMP.
    The Commissioners comment makes me believe that the investigators are getting interference from the players ! Not that this corrupt bunch haven't done that before !
    ×100000. But what can be done about it. We are fooked. ( see what I did there Trimmer). This will get swept away like the other ongoing ( LOL) investigations.

  10. #9
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hunter John View Post
    ×100000. But what can be done about it. We are fooked. ( see what I did there Trimmer). This will get swept away like the other ongoing ( LOL) investigations.
    Very nicely done. Did you know that you can say elohssa if you turn off spellcheck? LOL

  11. #10
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Lol. We will soon be giving the mod's fits. Especially if you keep calling Wynne a hctib.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •