-
December 7th, 2015, 07:20 PM
#11
Being hunters and dedicated conservationists and seeing as how we all know how to survive under extreme adverse conditions,why don't we just STFU,let the tree huggers and environazis shut down the oil sands,nuke plants,generating stations and all our vehicles. Then,we can all head for the bush and let the useless fkreus freeze in the dark.
-
December 7th, 2015 07:20 PM
# ADS
-
December 8th, 2015, 08:02 AM
#12
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
trimmer21
Being hunters and dedicated conservationists and seeing as how we all know how to survive under extreme adverse conditions,why don't we just STFU,let the tree huggers and environazis shut down the oil sands,nuke plants,generating stations and all our vehicles. Then,we can all head for the bush and let the useless fkreus freeze in the dark.
The ones who can't take care of themselves will position themselves so we will have to take care of them.
-
December 8th, 2015, 08:33 AM
#13
Has too much time on their hands
So the finance minister has said the "middle class tax cut but increase the taxes on the rich" plan will cost something rather than be "revenue neutral". It seems that it will cost the government $1.2 Billion/year over the next 5 years because, wait for it, the rich are creative in finding ways to reduce their taxable income. Despite the die hard Trudeau supporters, did anyone really think this plan would have been revenue neutral like the Great White Dope promised? Further more only 9 million Canadians will benefit from this plan. That is right, out of 35.16 million Canadians, about 1/4 of the people will benefit from this "fairness" election pitch. I suppose the people rest of Canadians (minus the 319 000 taxpayers who earn more than $200 000/year) are SOL.
On top of that, because the slow economic growth, the government now is talking about having a $25 Billion deficit over 3 years rather than the promised $10 Billion. Where did these clowns ever learn how to count or learn if you have slower than forecasted economic growth, don't go spending money like you are a sailor on shore leave for the first time in 8 months. If this is how it is going to be for the first month and a half on the job, I shudder to think what Canada will be heading to in four more years.
-
December 8th, 2015, 08:41 AM
#14

Originally Posted by
Dythbringer
So the finance minister has said the "middle class tax cut but increase the taxes on the rich" plan will cost something rather than be "revenue neutral". It seems that it will cost the government $1.2 Billion/year over the next 5 years because, wait for it, the rich are creative in finding ways to reduce their taxable income. Despite the die hard Trudeau supporters, did anyone really think this plan would have been revenue neutral like the Great White Dope promised? Further more only 9 million Canadians will benefit from this plan. That is right, out of 35.16 million Canadians, about 1/4 of the people will benefit from this "fairness" election pitch. I suppose the people rest of Canadians (minus the 319 000 taxpayers who earn more than $200 000/year) are SOL.
On top of that, because the slow economic growth, the government now is talking about having a $25 Billion deficit over 3 years rather than the promised $10 Billion. Where did these clowns ever learn how to count or learn if you have slower than forecasted economic growth, don't go spending money like you are a sailor on shore leave for the first time in 8 months. If this is how it is going to be for the first month and a half on the job, I shudder to think what Canada will be heading to in four more years.
Blame the voters. They chose him.
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
December 8th, 2015, 08:53 AM
#15

Originally Posted by
terrym
Blame the voters. They chose him.
Blame Harris !!!!! Lol
-
December 8th, 2015, 09:08 AM
#16
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
rick_iles
Blame Harris !!!!! Lol
The Federal Liberals won't be able to adopt that philosophy because then the Provincial Government won't have anything to fall back on.
-
December 8th, 2015, 09:25 AM
#17
Liberals never let the numbers get in the way of crazy promises and schemes. Just forge ahead and consequences be damned and if you disagree with them you must be a homophobe .
-
December 8th, 2015, 09:26 AM
#18
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
Hunter John
Liberals never let the numbers get in the way of crazy promises and schemes. Just forge ahead and consequences be damned and if you disagree with them you must be a homophobe .
Or hiding behind racism.
-
December 8th, 2015, 10:07 AM
#19
someone else having those childhood memories: Ever been on a bicycle without brakes going downhill?
Once it picks up speed, its going downhill pretty fast - don't try to stop it, it makes things just worse...
The sooner we get there, the better. Until then, hold on for your life and brace for impact...
-
December 8th, 2015, 10:08 AM
#20
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
Waftrudnir
someone else having those childhood memories: Ever been on a bicycle without brakes going downhill?
Once it picks up speed, its going downhill pretty fast - don't try to stop it, it makes things just worse...
The sooner we get there, the better. Until then, hold on for your life and brace for impact...
More like going down a snow covered hill with a crazy carpet and knowing there is barbed wire at the bottom of the hill...