Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 40 of 40

Thread: atv 2 up question

  1. #31
    Just starting out

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Side by sides are now considered dune buggies and dune buggies are now considered atv's....hence side by sides are now atv's. This passed in the spring. I carry the paperwork in my Teryx but will retrieve it and post the appropriate sections over the weekend. However, individual municipalities can still pass their own bylaws regarding them as can clubs.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #32
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Toys View Post
    Side by sides are now considered dune buggies and dune buggies are now considered atv's....hence side by sides are now atv's. This passed in the spring. I carry the paperwork in my Teryx but will retrieve it and post the appropriate sections over the weekend. However, individual municipalities can still pass their own bylaws regarding them as can clubs.
    I'm looking forward to seeing this. I know a few friends with UTV's who have been waiting for the changes.

  4. #33
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Toys View Post
    Side by sides are now considered dune buggies and dune buggies are now considered atv's....hence side by sides are now atv's. This passed in the spring. I carry the paperwork in my Teryx but will retrieve it and post the appropriate sections over the weekend. However, individual municipalities can still pass their own bylaws regarding them as can clubs.
    I call Shenanigans!

    if this were true, then why were side by side vehicles even mentioned in MPP Crack's motion? And why was it being set for debate on November 7 2013 if this was passed in the spring.

    copy and pasted from legislative assembly of Ontario's website
    " Ballot Item Number 55 – To be debated November 7, 2013.Private Members' Notice of Motion Number 48
    Avis de motion numéro 48 émanant d'un député
    Mr. Crack — That, in the opinion of this House, the operation of off-road vehicles on highways under Regulation 316/03 be changed to include side-by-side off-road vehicles, four seat side-by-side vehicles and two-up vehicles in order for them to be driven on highways under the same conditions as other off-road/all-terrain vehicles."

  5. #34
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DanO View Post
    i'll let the cop tell my wife to get off of the machine before we cross the road! Hope he's wearing a jock!
    Dan O.
    It behoves the buyer to find out what the rules are before you buy things like that.

  6. #35
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by B Wilson View Post
    Mr. Crack — That, in the opinion of this House, the operation of off-road vehicles on highways under Regulation 316/03 be changed to include side-by-side off-road vehicles, four seat side-by-side vehicles and two-up vehicles in order for them to be driven on highways under the same conditions as other off-road/all-terrain vehicles."

    MTO was contacted after the 7 Nov and they have absolutely to inclination to add SXS, 2 UPS or any other configuration to the regulation which allows single rider ATV use on prescribed roadways with municipal agreement.

  7. #36
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    A 3 wheeler is OK but 4 is not....were almost there....

    Last edited by impact; January 11th, 2014 at 01:05 PM.

  8. #37
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fisherman View Post
    MTO was contacted after the 7 Nov and they have absolutely to inclination to add SXS, 2 UPS or any other configuration to the regulation which allows single rider ATV use on prescribed roadways with municipal agreement.
    I thought that the MTO was supposed to enforce the rules, not make them??? We have elections to decide who makes the rules, or used to back in the old days....

  9. #38
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pat32rf View Post
    I thought that the MTO was supposed to enforce the rules, not make them??? We have elections to decide who makes the rules, or used to back in the old days....
    MTO legal dept does help write and develop regs and new legislation.
    Rick

  10. #39
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 400bigbear View Post
    Its only on the road that your limited .. . Drive in the ditch or one side on the shoulder .
    TD
    I don't believe that for a nanosecond. Check the definition of highway, goes from property line to property line. People have been ticketed for driving in the ditch areas.

  11. #40
    Loyal Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sparky30250 View Post
    Here is a link to the sudbury area ATV law

    http://www.greatersudbury.ca/linkser...6B/showMeta/0/
    This has changed as of 2015. They define what a 2-up is and that an atv with an add-on 2-up seat is not. Bottom line is a 2-up is allowed. You still need to check via their search page as to where you can and cannot ride and when.
    There are three reasons to own a gun. To protect yourself and your family, to hunt dangerous and delicious animals, and to keep the King of England out of your face.
    - Krusty the Clown

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •